diff mbox

[3.18-rc3,v9,3/5] irqchip: gic: Introduce plumbing for IPI FIQ

Message ID 1416936401-5147-4-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Daniel Thompson Nov. 25, 2014, 5:26 p.m. UTC 
Currently it is not possible to exploit FIQ for systems with a GIC, even if
the systems are otherwise capable of it. This patch makes it possible
for IPIs to be delivered using FIQ.

To do so it modifies the register state so that normal interrupts are
placed in group 1 and specific IPIs are placed into group 0. It also
configures the controller to raise group 0 interrupts using the FIQ
signal. It provides a means for architecture code to define which IPIs
shall use FIQ and to acknowledge any IPIs that are raised.

All GIC hardware except GICv1-without-TrustZone support provides a means
to group exceptions into group 0 and group 1 but the hardware
functionality is unavailable to the kernel when a secure monitor is
present because access to the grouping registers are prohibited outside
"secure world". However when grouping is not available (or in the case
of early GICv1 implementations is very hard to configure) the code to
change groups does not deploy and all IPIs will be raised via IRQ.

It has been tested and shown working on two systems capable of
supporting grouping (Freescale i.MX6 and STiH416). It has also been
tested for boot regressions on two systems that do not support grouping
(vexpress-a9 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 600).

Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/traps.c         |   5 +-
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c       | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h |   8 +++
 3 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Daniel Thompson Nov. 26, 2014, 3:48 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 26/11/14 15:09, Tim Sander wrote:
> I would be quite happy if grouping support for gic would be mainlined.
> Then only the dance to get the old gic version 1 working with fiqs would be 
> needed...

You mention "the dance"...

Are you familiar with this work from Marek Vasut?
  https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/15/550

Marek blushed a bit when it was written and it wasn't very popular in
code review... however it does arranges memory to mapped in a manner
that allows FIQ to be deployed by the kernel on early gic v1 devices.


>> +/*
>> + * Shift an interrupt between Group 0 and Group 1.
>> + *
>> + * In addition to changing the group we also modify the priority to
>> + * match what "ARM strongly recommends" for a system where no Group 1
>> + * interrupt must ever preempt a Group 0 interrupt.
>> + *
>> + * If is safe to call this function on systems which do not support
>> + * grouping (it will have no effect).
>> + */
>> +static void gic_set_group_irq(void __iomem *base, unsigned int hwirq,
>> +				int group)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned int grp_reg = hwirq / 32 * 4;
>> +	u32 grp_mask = BIT(hwirq % 32);
>> +	u32 grp_val;
>> +
>> +	unsigned int pri_reg = (hwirq / 4) * 4;
>> +	u32 pri_mask = BIT(7 + ((hwirq % 4) * 8));
>> +	u32 pri_val;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Systems which do not support grouping will have not have
>> +	 * the EnableGrp1 bit set.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!(GICD_ENABLE_GRP1 & readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CTRL)))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
>> +
> Assumption: The interrupt in question is not masked over here?

At present this function is called only during initialization and all
interrupts are globally disabled at that stage in the boot.


>> +	grp_val = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_IGROUP + grp_reg);
>> +	pri_val = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_PRI + pri_reg);
>> +
>> +	if (group) {
>> +		grp_val |= grp_mask;
>> +		pri_val |= pri_mask;
>> +	} else {
>> +		grp_val &= ~grp_mask;
>> +		pri_val &= ~pri_mask;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	writel_relaxed(grp_val, base + GIC_DIST_IGROUP + grp_reg);
> If the assumption is true, then there is a race if the interrupt in question 
> hits here with undefined priority setting. Recomended workaround would be
> masking the interrupt in question.

An interesting question!

Firstly, as mentioned above, such a race is impossible with the code
proposed so far.

I do have some code sitting written by untested that makes it possible
to set the group based on a flag passed during request_irq() (something
requested by tglx in a review from a month or two back). That also means
the interrupt is disabled during the call.

I think that means that neither now nor in the immediate future would
such a race be possible.


Daniel.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
index 0c8b10801d36..4dc45b38e56e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/traps.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h>
 
 #include <linux/atomic.h>
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
@@ -479,7 +480,9 @@  asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry handle_fiq_as_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 	nmi_enter();
 
-	/* nop. FIQ handlers for special arch/arm features can be added here. */
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_GIC
+	gic_handle_fiq_ipi();
+#endif
 
 	nmi_exit();
 
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index a53aa11e4f17..dfec7a4c1c64 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
 #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h>
+#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
 
 #include <asm/cputype.h>
 #include <asm/irq.h>
@@ -48,6 +49,10 @@ 
 #include "irq-gic-common.h"
 #include "irqchip.h"
 
+#ifndef SMP_IPI_FIQ_MASK
+#define SMP_IPI_FIQ_MASK 0
+#endif
+
 union gic_base {
 	void __iomem *common_base;
 	void __percpu * __iomem *percpu_base;
@@ -333,6 +338,93 @@  static struct irq_chip gic_chip = {
 	.irq_set_wake		= gic_set_wake,
 };
 
+/*
+ * Shift an interrupt between Group 0 and Group 1.
+ *
+ * In addition to changing the group we also modify the priority to
+ * match what "ARM strongly recommends" for a system where no Group 1
+ * interrupt must ever preempt a Group 0 interrupt.
+ *
+ * If is safe to call this function on systems which do not support
+ * grouping (it will have no effect).
+ */
+static void gic_set_group_irq(void __iomem *base, unsigned int hwirq,
+				int group)
+{
+	unsigned int grp_reg = hwirq / 32 * 4;
+	u32 grp_mask = BIT(hwirq % 32);
+	u32 grp_val;
+
+	unsigned int pri_reg = (hwirq / 4) * 4;
+	u32 pri_mask = BIT(7 + ((hwirq % 4) * 8));
+	u32 pri_val;
+
+	/*
+	 * Systems which do not support grouping will have not have
+	 * the EnableGrp1 bit set.
+	 */
+	if (!(GICD_ENABLE_GRP1 & readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CTRL)))
+		return;
+
+	raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
+
+	grp_val = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_IGROUP + grp_reg);
+	pri_val = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_PRI + pri_reg);
+
+	if (group) {
+		grp_val |= grp_mask;
+		pri_val |= pri_mask;
+	} else {
+		grp_val &= ~grp_mask;
+		pri_val &= ~pri_mask;
+	}
+
+	writel_relaxed(grp_val, base + GIC_DIST_IGROUP + grp_reg);
+	writel_relaxed(pri_val, base + GIC_DIST_PRI + pri_reg);
+
+	raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test which group an interrupt belongs to.
+ *
+ * Returns 0 if the controller does not support grouping.
+ */
+static int gic_get_group_irq(void __iomem *base, unsigned int hwirq)
+{
+	unsigned int grp_reg = hwirq / 32 * 4;
+	u32 grp_val;
+
+	grp_val = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_IGROUP + grp_reg);
+
+	return (grp_val >> (hwirq % 32)) & 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Fully acknowledge (both ack and eoi) any outstanding FIQ-based IPI,
+ * otherwise do nothing.
+ */
+void gic_handle_fiq_ipi(void)
+{
+	struct gic_chip_data *gic = &gic_data[0];
+	void __iomem *cpu_base = gic_data_cpu_base(gic);
+	unsigned long irqstat, irqnr;
+
+	if (WARN_ON(!in_nmi()))
+		return;
+
+	while ((1u << readl_relaxed(cpu_base + GIC_CPU_HIGHPRI)) &
+	       SMP_IPI_FIQ_MASK) {
+		irqstat = readl_relaxed(cpu_base + GIC_CPU_INTACK);
+		writel_relaxed(irqstat, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_EOI);
+
+		irqnr = irqstat & GICC_IAR_INT_ID_MASK;
+		WARN_RATELIMIT(irqnr > 16,
+			       "Unexpected irqnr %lu (bad prioritization?)\n",
+			       irqnr);
+	}
+}
+
 void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq)
 {
 	if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
@@ -364,15 +456,24 @@  static u8 gic_get_cpumask(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
 static void gic_cpu_if_up(void)
 {
 	void __iomem *cpu_base = gic_data_cpu_base(&gic_data[0]);
-	u32 bypass = 0;
+	void __iomem *dist_base = gic_data_dist_base(&gic_data[0]);
+	u32 ctrl = 0;
 
 	/*
-	* Preserve bypass disable bits to be written back later
-	*/
-	bypass = readl(cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
-	bypass &= GICC_DIS_BYPASS_MASK;
+	 * Preserve bypass disable bits to be written back later
+	 */
+	ctrl = readl(cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
+	ctrl &= GICC_DIS_BYPASS_MASK;
 
-	writel_relaxed(bypass | GICC_ENABLE, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
+	/*
+	 * If EnableGrp1 is set in the distributor then enable group 1
+	 * support for this CPU (and route group 0 interrupts to FIQ).
+	 */
+	if (GICD_ENABLE_GRP1 & readl_relaxed(dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTRL))
+		ctrl |= GICC_COMMON_BPR | GICC_FIQ_EN | GICC_ACK_CTL |
+			GICC_ENABLE_GRP1;
+
+	writel_relaxed(ctrl | GICC_ENABLE, cpu_base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
 }
 
 
@@ -396,7 +497,23 @@  static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
 
 	gic_dist_config(base, gic_irqs, NULL);
 
-	writel_relaxed(GICD_ENABLE, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
+	/*
+	 * Set EnableGrp1/EnableGrp0 (bit 1 and 0) or EnableGrp (bit 0 only,
+	 * bit 1 ignored) depending on current mode.
+	 */
+	writel_relaxed(GICD_ENABLE_GRP1 | GICD_ENABLE, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
+
+	/*
+	 * Set all global interrupts to be group 1 if (and only if) it
+	 * is possible to enable group 1 interrupts. This register is RAZ/WI
+	 * if not accessible or not implemented, however some GICv1 devices
+	 * do not implement the EnableGrp1 bit making it unsafe to set
+	 * this register unconditionally.
+	 */
+	if (GICD_ENABLE_GRP1 & readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CTRL))
+		for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 32)
+			writel_relaxed(0xffffffff,
+				       base + GIC_DIST_IGROUP + i * 4 / 32);
 }
 
 static void gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
@@ -405,6 +522,7 @@  static void gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
 	void __iomem *base = gic_data_cpu_base(gic);
 	unsigned int cpu_mask, cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	int i;
+	unsigned long secure_irqs, secure_irq;
 
 	/*
 	 * Get what the GIC says our CPU mask is.
@@ -423,6 +541,19 @@  static void gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
 
 	gic_cpu_config(dist_base, NULL);
 
+	/*
+	 * If the distributor is configured to support interrupt grouping
+	 * then set any PPI and SGI interrupts not set in SMP_IPI_FIQ_MASK
+	 * to be group1 and ensure any remaining group 0 interrupts have
+	 * the right priority.
+	 */
+	if (GICD_ENABLE_GRP1 & readl_relaxed(dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTRL)) {
+		secure_irqs = SMP_IPI_FIQ_MASK;
+		writel_relaxed(~secure_irqs, dist_base + GIC_DIST_IGROUP + 0);
+		for_each_set_bit(secure_irq, &secure_irqs, 16)
+			gic_set_group_irq(dist_base, secure_irq, 0);
+	}
+
 	writel_relaxed(GICC_INT_PRI_THRESHOLD, base + GIC_CPU_PRIMASK);
 	gic_cpu_if_up();
 }
@@ -512,7 +643,8 @@  static void gic_dist_restore(unsigned int gic_nr)
 		writel_relaxed(gic_data[gic_nr].saved_spi_enable[i],
 			dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + i * 4);
 
-	writel_relaxed(GICD_ENABLE, dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
+	writel_relaxed(GICD_ENABLE_GRP1 | GICD_ENABLE,
+		       dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
 }
 
 static void gic_cpu_save(unsigned int gic_nr)
@@ -640,6 +772,7 @@  static void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq)
 {
 	int cpu;
 	unsigned long map = 0;
+	unsigned long softint;
 
 	read_lock(&cpu_map_migration_lock);
 
@@ -654,7 +787,11 @@  static void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq)
 	dmb(ishst);
 
 	/* this always happens on GIC0 */
-	writel_relaxed(map << 16 | irq, gic_data_dist_base(&gic_data[0]) + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
+	softint = map << 16 | irq;
+	if (gic_get_group_irq(gic_data_dist_base(&gic_data[0]), irq))
+		softint |= 0x8000;
+	writel_relaxed(softint,
+		       gic_data_dist_base(&gic_data[0]) + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
 
 	read_unlock(&cpu_map_migration_lock);
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
index 13eed92c7d24..a906fb7ac11f 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
@@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ 
 #define GIC_CPU_IDENT			0xfc
 
 #define GICC_ENABLE			0x1
+#define GICC_ENABLE_GRP1                0x2
+#define GICC_ACK_CTL                    0x4
+#define GICC_FIQ_EN                     0x8
+#define GICC_COMMON_BPR                 0x10
 #define GICC_INT_PRI_THRESHOLD		0xf0
 #define GICC_IAR_INT_ID_MASK		0x3ff
 #define GICC_INT_SPURIOUS		1023
@@ -44,6 +48,7 @@ 
 #define GIC_DIST_SGI_PENDING_SET	0xf20
 
 #define GICD_ENABLE			0x1
+#define GICD_ENABLE_GRP1		0x2
 #define GICD_DISABLE			0x0
 #define GICD_INT_ACTLOW_LVLTRIG		0x0
 #define GICD_INT_EN_CLR_X32		0xffffffff
@@ -117,5 +122,8 @@  static inline void __init register_routable_domain_ops
 {
 	gic_routable_irq_domain_ops = ops;
 }
+
+void gic_handle_fiq_ipi(void);
+
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY */
 #endif