| Message ID | 1421928077-4698-1-git-send-email-pang.xunlei@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org> wrote: > If a system does not provide a persistent_clock(), the time > will be updated on resume by rtc_resume(). With the addition > of the non-stop clocksources for suspend timing, those systems > set the time on resume in timekeeping_resume(), but may not > provide a valid persistent_clock(). > > This results in the rtc_resume() logic thinking no one has set > the time and it then will over-write the suspend time again, > which is not necessary and only increases clock error. > > So, fix this for rtc_resume(). > > Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org> > --- > v1->v2: > Modify according to Thomas' feedback. > > drivers/rtc/class.c | 2 +- > include/linux/timekeeping.h | 7 +++++++ > kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 16 +++++----------- > 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/class.c b/drivers/rtc/class.c > index 472a5ad..6100af5 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/class.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/class.c > @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int rtc_resume(struct device *dev) > struct timespec64 sleep_time; > int err; > > - if (has_persistent_clock()) > + if (timekeeping_sleeptime_injected()) > return 0; > > rtc_hctosys_ret = -ENODEV; > diff --git a/include/linux/timekeeping.h b/include/linux/timekeeping.h > index 9b63d13..2b87c64 100644 > --- a/include/linux/timekeeping.h > +++ b/include/linux/timekeeping.h > @@ -238,6 +238,13 @@ extern void getnstime_raw_and_real(struct timespec *ts_raw, > */ > extern bool persistent_clock_exist; > extern int persistent_clock_is_local; > +extern bool timekeeping_sleeptime_inject; > + > +/* Used by rtc_resume() */ > +static inline bool timekeeping_sleeptime_injected(void) > +{ > + return timekeeping_sleeptime_inject; > +} > Again, there's no reason to make this a static inline, nor the sleeptime_inject variable global. Just make it a function in timekeeping and provide definition so it can be used by the rtc resume. thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/class.c b/drivers/rtc/class.c index 472a5ad..6100af5 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/class.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/class.c @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int rtc_resume(struct device *dev) struct timespec64 sleep_time; int err; - if (has_persistent_clock()) + if (timekeeping_sleeptime_injected()) return 0; rtc_hctosys_ret = -ENODEV; diff --git a/include/linux/timekeeping.h b/include/linux/timekeeping.h index 9b63d13..2b87c64 100644 --- a/include/linux/timekeeping.h +++ b/include/linux/timekeeping.h @@ -238,6 +238,13 @@ extern void getnstime_raw_and_real(struct timespec *ts_raw, */ extern bool persistent_clock_exist; extern int persistent_clock_is_local; +extern bool timekeeping_sleeptime_inject; + +/* Used by rtc_resume() */ +static inline bool timekeeping_sleeptime_injected(void) +{ + return timekeeping_sleeptime_inject; +} static inline bool has_persistent_clock(void) { diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c index 6a93185..732ccd0 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ int __read_mostly timekeeping_suspended; /* Flag for if there is a persistent clock on this platform */ bool __read_mostly persistent_clock_exist = false; +bool timekeeping_sleeptime_inject; static inline void tk_normalize_xtime(struct timekeeper *tk) { @@ -1140,13 +1141,6 @@ void timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64(struct timespec64 *delta) struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper; unsigned long flags; - /* - * Make sure we don't set the clock twice, as timekeeping_resume() - * already did it - */ - if (has_persistent_clock()) - return; - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&timekeeper_lock, flags); write_seqcount_begin(&tk_core.seq); @@ -1178,8 +1172,8 @@ static void timekeeping_resume(void) struct timespec64 ts_new, ts_delta; struct timespec tmp; cycle_t cycle_now, cycle_delta; - bool suspendtime_found = false; + timekeeping_sleeptime_inject = false; read_persistent_clock(&tmp); ts_new = timespec_to_timespec64(tmp); @@ -1226,13 +1220,13 @@ static void timekeeping_resume(void) nsec += ((u64) cycle_delta * mult) >> shift; ts_delta = ns_to_timespec64(nsec); - suspendtime_found = true; + timekeeping_sleeptime_inject = true; } else if (timespec64_compare(&ts_new, &timekeeping_suspend_time) > 0) { ts_delta = timespec64_sub(ts_new, timekeeping_suspend_time); - suspendtime_found = true; + timekeeping_sleeptime_inject = true; } - if (suspendtime_found) + if (timekeeping_sleeptime_inject) __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(tk, &ts_delta); /* Re-base the last cycle value */
If a system does not provide a persistent_clock(), the time will be updated on resume by rtc_resume(). With the addition of the non-stop clocksources for suspend timing, those systems set the time on resume in timekeeping_resume(), but may not provide a valid persistent_clock(). This results in the rtc_resume() logic thinking no one has set the time and it then will over-write the suspend time again, which is not necessary and only increases clock error. So, fix this for rtc_resume(). Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org> --- v1->v2: Modify according to Thomas' feedback. drivers/rtc/class.c | 2 +- include/linux/timekeeping.h | 7 +++++++ kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 16 +++++----------- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)