diff mbox series

b43legacy: Fix spelling mistake "overflew" -> "overflowed"

Message ID 20210601102855.8884-1-colin.king@canonical.com
State New
Headers show
Series b43legacy: Fix spelling mistake "overflew" -> "overflowed" | expand

Commit Message

Colin King June 1, 2021, 10:28 a.m. UTC 
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

There is a spelling mistake in a comment. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43legacy/main.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Kalle Valo June 3, 2021, 9:32 a.m. UTC | #1 
Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:

> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> There is a spelling mistake in a comment. Fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

fef1cdbba4d1 b43legacy: Fix spelling mistake "overflew" -> "overflowed"
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43legacy/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43legacy/main.c
index f64ebff68308..eec3af9c3745 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43legacy/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43legacy/main.c
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@  void b43legacy_tsf_read(struct b43legacy_wldev *dev, u64 *tsf)
 	 * registers, we should take care of register overflows.
 	 * In theory, the whole tsf read process should be atomic.
 	 * We try to be atomic here, by restaring the read process,
-	 * if any of the high registers changed (overflew).
+	 * if any of the high registers changed (overflowed).
 	 */
 	if (dev->dev->id.revision >= 3) {
 		u32 low;