Message ID | 1425914206-22295-5-git-send-email-lina.iyer@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 03/11/2015 07:16 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 03/09/15 08:16, Lina Iyer wrote: >> Register cpuidle ops for Krait Processor Sub-System. >> Supports v1 and v2 versions of KPSS. >> >> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> >> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> >> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> >> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> >> --- >> arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle_ops.h | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle_ops.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle_ops.h >> index be0a612..40cb262 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle_ops.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle_ops.h >> @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ >> /* >> * List of cpuidle operations >> */ >> + >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_QCOM_PM) > > Why not #ifdef CONFIG_QCOM_PM? I thought IS_ENABLED was for C code where > you want to put it in an if () statement. This is right. But the IS_ENABLED is also valid. It seems the current trend is to replace #ifdef with #if IS_ENABLED. It is supposed to prevent to create or'ed conditional with the module support. eg: #if defined(CONFIG_FOO) || defined(CONFIG_FOO_MODULE) is replaced by: #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FOO) Lina: By the way, it would be preferable to use the CONFIG_ARM_QCOM_CPUIDLE where IS_ENABLED makes more sense even the drivers are not modules (who knows if they are converted as module again hence #ifdef will be invalid). >> +CPUIDLE_OPS(qcom_kpss_v1) >> +CPUIDLE_OPS(qcom_kpss_v2) >> +#endif > >
On Thu, Mar 12 2015 at 06:34 -0600, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >On 03/11/2015 07:16 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>On 03/09/15 08:16, Lina Iyer wrote: [...] >>>+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_QCOM_PM) >> >>Why not #ifdef CONFIG_QCOM_PM? I thought IS_ENABLED was for C code where >>you want to put it in an if () statement. > >This is right. But the IS_ENABLED is also valid. > >It seems the current trend is to replace #ifdef with #if IS_ENABLED. >It is supposed to prevent to create or'ed conditional with the module >support. > >eg: > >#if defined(CONFIG_FOO) || defined(CONFIG_FOO_MODULE) > >is replaced by: > >#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FOO) > >Lina: By the way, it would be preferable to use the >CONFIG_ARM_QCOM_CPUIDLE where IS_ENABLED makes more sense even the Daniel: I dont have CONFIG_ARM_QCOM_CPUIDLE defined anymore. By moving to generic ARM cpuidle, i removed all changes to drivers/cpuidle/. So I used the config item that defineds these items. Also, having two indpendent CONFIG_ items provides a chance that the declaration is not matched with the definition or vice versa. >drivers are not modules (who knows if they are converted as module >again hence #ifdef will be invalid). > > > >>>+CPUIDLE_OPS(qcom_kpss_v1) >>>+CPUIDLE_OPS(qcom_kpss_v2) >>>+#endif -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 03/12/2015 04:06 PM, Lina Iyer wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12 2015 at 06:34 -0600, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> On 03/11/2015 07:16 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> On 03/09/15 08:16, Lina Iyer wrote: > > [...] > >>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_QCOM_PM) >>> >>> Why not #ifdef CONFIG_QCOM_PM? I thought IS_ENABLED was for C code where >>> you want to put it in an if () statement. >> >> This is right. But the IS_ENABLED is also valid. >> >> It seems the current trend is to replace #ifdef with #if IS_ENABLED. >> It is supposed to prevent to create or'ed conditional with the module >> support. >> >> eg: >> >> #if defined(CONFIG_FOO) || defined(CONFIG_FOO_MODULE) >> >> is replaced by: >> >> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FOO) >> >> Lina: By the way, it would be preferable to use the >> CONFIG_ARM_QCOM_CPUIDLE where IS_ENABLED makes more sense even the > > Daniel: I dont have CONFIG_ARM_QCOM_CPUIDLE defined anymore. By moving > to generic ARM cpuidle, i removed all changes to drivers/cpuidle/. So I > used the config item that defineds these items. > > Also, having two indpendent CONFIG_ items provides a chance that the > declaration is not matched with the definition or vice versa. I think CONFIG_ARM_QCOM_CPUIDLE should be defined as a bool in the Kconfig.arm in drivers/cpuidle. We may want to disable the different cpuidle drivers even if they rely on the generic cpuidle driver. >> drivers are not modules (who knows if they are converted as module >> again hence #ifdef will be invalid). >> >> >> >>>> +CPUIDLE_OPS(qcom_kpss_v1) >>>> +CPUIDLE_OPS(qcom_kpss_v2) >>>> +#endif >
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle_ops.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle_ops.h index be0a612..40cb262 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle_ops.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle_ops.h @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ /* * List of cpuidle operations */ + +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_QCOM_PM) +CPUIDLE_OPS(qcom_kpss_v1) +CPUIDLE_OPS(qcom_kpss_v2) +#endif
Register cpuidle ops for Krait Processor Sub-System. Supports v1 and v2 versions of KPSS. Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> --- arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle_ops.h | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)