Message ID | 1426603922-24107-1-git-send-email-qiyaoltc@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <patchwork-forward+bncBDKYLT662AOBBIX7UCUAKGQEEF7HOYI@linaro.org> X-Original-To: linaro@patches.linaro.org Delivered-To: linaro@patches.linaro.org Received: from mail-la0-f70.google.com (mail-la0-f70.google.com [209.85.215.70]) by ip-10-151-82-157.ec2.internal (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B2B821547 for <linaro@patches.linaro.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by labgm9 with SMTP id gm9sf2271014lab.1 for <linaro@patches.linaro.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:52:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:delivered-to:mailing-list :precedence:list-id:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive :list-post:list-help:sender:delivered-to:from:to:subject:date :message-id:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results; bh=Gq7+MslPfBd9c6AlxJnwVyZodZthBlKwC+EWts82LsI=; b=A0Yy5aYqq1oOBV7oCxmy1Kpv4ll4Qi6TVEaINlidNG9QK9z/SO5iTwOVb08HF3F0GF 9fa9EHF3qXY0alb+xRBgM93yx5tEFq7DUnbAprfbcMxMb/9b9frM0Dvmf/MP2dwmvjci oJgIRoA2SHYwukbDm6kvOWcQIvQ6UnSwuhAV4OveyG632fjRIYR5a7ynGQ0xBk+zH0lX eq4v5J1HIen8Ndcx2WzLEw2RUq40DlNmEuNtbN08Kko0TZcC+rUZ+INRUieSqYMeeSB8 d6Xd6bDQmV6d1Mxc3XuR0hnOtjz6J/NBkTTnPu1orAVXmfP44UzO7meF903phlm24Fu4 da2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlrtFHTkI0GXwDSvPZu8IVnhaBWBfuoecTQc7pMobrqAaO4a49nHIDegjMNQNe6WA88zGn7 X-Received: by 10.112.77.101 with SMTP id r5mr10451829lbw.4.1426603938881; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:52:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: patchwork-forward@linaro.org Received: by 10.152.5.38 with SMTP id p6ls44218lap.17.gmail; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:52:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.93.167 with SMTP id cv7mr28201031lbb.77.1426603938331; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x232.google.com (mail-la0-x232.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c03::232]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id er5si10713789lac.11.2015.03.17.07.52.18 for <patchwork-forward@linaro.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of patch+caf_=patchwork-forward=linaro.org@linaro.org designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::232 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::232; Received: by lagg8 with SMTP id g8so10770338lag.1 for <patchwork-forward@linaro.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:52:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.28.5 with SMTP id x5mr59175729lag.112.1426603938073; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:52:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-To: patchwork-forward@linaro.org X-Forwarded-For: patch@linaro.org patchwork-forward@linaro.org Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.112.35.133 with SMTP id h5csp559887lbj; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:52:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.107.131.159 with SMTP id n31mr86229022ioi.66.1426603936545; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:52:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org. [209.132.180.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z2si29753904pdc.238.2015.03.17.07.52.15 for <patch@linaro.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:52:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gdb-patches-return-120826-patch=linaro.org@sourceware.org designates 209.132.180.131 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.131; Received: (qmail 56683 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2015 14:52:08 -0000 Mailing-List: list patchwork-forward@linaro.org; contact patchwork-forward+owners@linaro.org Precedence: list List-Id: <patchwork-forward.linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+836684582541+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>, <http://groups.google.com/a/linaro.org/group/patchwork-forward/subscribe> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org> List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/a/linaro.org/group/patchwork-forward/> List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/a/linaro.org/group/patchwork-forward/post>, <mailto:patchwork-forward@linaro.org> List-Help: <http://support.google.com/a/linaro.org/bin/topic.py?topic=25838>, <mailto:patchwork-forward+help@linaro.org> Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Delivered-To: mailing list gdb-patches@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 56644 invoked by uid 89); 17 Mar 2015 14:52:08 -0000 X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-pa0-f42.google.com Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com (HELO mail-pa0-f42.google.com) (209.85.220.42) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:52:07 +0000 Received: by pagr17 with SMTP id r17so12008935pag.0 for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:52:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.66.196 with SMTP id h4mr149144485pat.127.1426603925784; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:52:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from E107787-LIN.cambridge.arm.com (gcc1-power7.osuosl.org. [140.211.15.137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id tg14sm22912515pac.15.2015.03.17.07.52.04 for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 07:52:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com> To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [rfc, spu] Don't call set_gdbarch_cannot_step_breakpoint in spu_gdbarch_init Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:52:02 +0000 Message-Id: <1426603922-24107-1-git-send-email-qiyaoltc@gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-Original-Sender: qiyaoltc@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of patch+caf_=patchwork-forward=linaro.org@linaro.org designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::232 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=patch+caf_=patchwork-forward=linaro.org@linaro.org; dkim=pass header.i=@sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com X-Google-Group-Id: 836684582541 |
diff --git a/gdb/spu-tdep.c b/gdb/spu-tdep.c index 36ad312..870cf32 100644 --- a/gdb/spu-tdep.c +++ b/gdb/spu-tdep.c @@ -2794,7 +2794,6 @@ spu_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch_list *arches) set_gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break (gdbarch, 4); set_gdbarch_breakpoint_from_pc (gdbarch, spu_breakpoint_from_pc); set_gdbarch_memory_remove_breakpoint (gdbarch, spu_memory_remove_breakpoint); - set_gdbarch_cannot_step_breakpoint (gdbarch, 1); set_gdbarch_software_single_step (gdbarch, spu_software_single_step); set_gdbarch_get_longjmp_target (gdbarch, spu_get_longjmp_target);
From: Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org> Nowadays, in infrun.c:resume, the setting to 'step' variable is like: if (use_displaced_stepping (gdbarch) && tp->control.trap_expected && sig == GDB_SIGNAL_0 && !current_inferior ()->waiting_for_vfork_done) { } /* Do we need to do it the hard way, w/temp breakpoints? */ else if (step) step = maybe_software_singlestep (gdbarch, pc); <-- [1] ... if (execution_direction != EXEC_REVERSE && step && breakpoint_inserted_here_p (aspace, pc)) { ... if (gdbarch_cannot_step_breakpoint (gdbarch)) <-- [2] step = 0; } spu doesn't have displaced stepping and uses software single step, so 'step' is set to zero in [1], and [2] becomes unreachable as a result. So don't have to call set_gdbarch_cannot_step_breakpoint in spu_gdbarch_init. On the other hand, we either have hardware single step or software single step, do we still need gdbarch method cannot_step_breakpoint? CANNOT_STEP_BREAKPOINT was introduced in 1993 by commit cef4c2e7a5f2d3426a8255f74b6c7f4e795fd9a4 for alpha OSF/1 native support. I don't have spu machine to test this patch. gdb: 2015-03-17 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org> * spu-tdep.c (spu_gdbarch_init): Don't call set_gdbarch_cannot_step_breakpoint. --- gdb/spu-tdep.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)