diff mbox series

[bpf,v2,2/2] bpf: selftest to verify mixing bpf2bpf calls and tailcalls with insn patch

Message ID 20210707223848.14580-3-john.fastabend@gmail.com
State New
Headers show
Series bpf, fix for subprogs with tailcalls | expand

Commit Message

John Fastabend July 7, 2021, 10:38 p.m. UTC 
This adds some extra noise to the tailcall_bpf2bpf4 tests that will cause
verify to patch insns. This then moves around subprog start/end insn
index and poke descriptor insn index to ensure that verify and JIT will
continue to track these correctly.

If done correctly verifier should pass this program same as before and
JIT should emit tail call logic.

Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c      | 36 +++++++++++++------
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c   | 21 ++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Comments

Alexei Starovoitov July 8, 2021, 4:05 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 3:39 PM John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> -static volatile int count;

> +int count = 0;

> +int noise = 0;

> +

> +__always_inline int subprog_noise(void)

> +{

> +       __u32 key = 0;

> +

> +       bpf_printk("hello noisy subprog %d\n", key);

> +       bpf_map_lookup_elem(&nop_table, &key);

> +       return 0;

> +}


This selftest patch I had to apply manually due to conflicts.
I've also removed the noisy printk before pushing.
I verified that I saw the spam before removing it.
The patch 1 looks great. Thanks a lot for the fix.
John Fastabend July 8, 2021, 8:42 p.m. UTC | #2 
Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 3:39 PM John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> wrote:

> >

> > -static volatile int count;

> > +int count = 0;

> > +int noise = 0;

> > +

> > +__always_inline int subprog_noise(void)

> > +{

> > +       __u32 key = 0;

> > +

> > +       bpf_printk("hello noisy subprog %d\n", key);

> > +       bpf_map_lookup_elem(&nop_table, &key);

> > +       return 0;

> > +}

> 

> This selftest patch I had to apply manually due to conflicts.

> I've also removed the noisy printk before pushing.


Thanks! I had the printk there to verify the code was actually
being run, but forgot to remove it before submitting.

> I verified that I saw the spam before removing it.


Great.

> The patch 1 looks great. Thanks a lot for the fix.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
index ee27d68d2a1c..b5940e6ca67c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
@@ -715,6 +715,8 @@  static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_3(void)
 	bpf_object__close(obj);
 }
 
+#include "tailcall_bpf2bpf4.skel.h"
+
 /* test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4 checks that tailcall counter is correctly preserved
  * across tailcalls combined with bpf2bpf calls. for making sure that tailcall
  * counter behaves correctly, bpf program will go through following flow:
@@ -727,10 +729,15 @@  static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_3(void)
  * the loop begins. At the end of the test make sure that the global counter is
  * equal to 31, because tailcall counter includes the first two tailcalls
  * whereas global counter is incremented only on loop presented on flow above.
+ *
+ * The noise parameter is used to insert bpf_map_update calls into the logic
+ * to force verifier to patch instructions. This allows us to ensure jump
+ * logic remains correct with instruction movement.
  */
-static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(void)
+static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(bool noise)
 {
-	int err, map_fd, prog_fd, main_fd, data_fd, i, val;
+	int err, map_fd, prog_fd, main_fd, data_fd, i;
+	struct tailcall_bpf2bpf4__bss val;
 	struct bpf_map *prog_array, *data_map;
 	struct bpf_program *prog;
 	struct bpf_object *obj;
@@ -774,11 +781,6 @@  static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(void)
 			goto out;
 	}
 
-	err = bpf_prog_test_run(main_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), 0,
-				&duration, &retval, NULL);
-	CHECK(err || retval != sizeof(pkt_v4) * 3, "tailcall", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n",
-	      err, errno, retval);
-
 	data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "tailcall.bss");
 	if (CHECK_FAIL(!data_map || !bpf_map__is_internal(data_map)))
 		return;
@@ -787,10 +789,22 @@  static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(void)
 	if (CHECK_FAIL(map_fd < 0))
 		return;
 
+	i = 0;
+	val.noise = noise;
+	val.count = 0;
+	err = bpf_map_update_elem(data_fd, &i, &val, BPF_ANY);
+	if (CHECK_FAIL(err))
+		goto out;
+
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run(main_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4), 0,
+				&duration, &retval, NULL);
+	CHECK(err || retval != sizeof(pkt_v4) * 3, "tailcall", "err %d errno %d retval %d\n",
+	      err, errno, retval);
+
 	i = 0;
 	err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(data_fd, &i, &val);
-	CHECK(err || val != 31, "tailcall count", "err %d errno %d count %d\n",
-	      err, errno, val);
+	CHECK(err || val.count != 31, "tailcall count", "err %d errno %d count %d\n",
+	      err, errno, val.count);
 
 out:
 	bpf_object__close(obj);
@@ -815,5 +829,7 @@  void test_tailcalls(void)
 	if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_3"))
 		test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_3();
 	if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_4"))
-		test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4();
+		test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(false);
+	if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_5"))
+		test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(true);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c
index 9a1b166b7fbe..6242803dabde 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c
@@ -2,6 +2,13 @@ 
 #include <linux/bpf.h>
 #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
 
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+	__uint(max_entries, 1);
+	__uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32));
+	__uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32));
+} nop_table SEC(".maps");
+
 struct {
 	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY);
 	__uint(max_entries, 3);
@@ -9,11 +16,23 @@  struct {
 	__uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32));
 } jmp_table SEC(".maps");
 
-static volatile int count;
+int count = 0;
+int noise = 0;
+
+__always_inline int subprog_noise(void)
+{
+	__u32 key = 0;
+
+	bpf_printk("hello noisy subprog %d\n", key);
+	bpf_map_lookup_elem(&nop_table, &key);
+	return 0;
+}
 
 __noinline
 int subprog_tail_2(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 {
+	if (noise)
+		subprog_noise();
 	bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 2);
 	return skb->len * 3;
 }