diff mbox series

power: supply: qcom_smbb: Remove superfluous error message

Message ID 20210720141539.7716-1-tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com
State Accepted
Commit 391719dce5ebd416347f35d7a136feb6a04cecb8
Headers show
Series power: supply: qcom_smbb: Remove superfluous error message | expand

Commit Message

Tang Bin July 20, 2021, 2:15 p.m. UTC
In the probe function, when get irq failed, the function
platform_get_irq_byname() logs an error message, so remove
redundant message here.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
---
 drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Tang Bin July 26, 2021, 1:16 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi, Bjorn Andersson:

On 2021/7/20 23:52, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 20 Jul 09:15 CDT 2021, Tang Bin wrote:
>
>> In the probe function, when get irq failed, the function
>> platform_get_irq_byname() logs an error message, so remove
>> redundant message here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> This says "Zhang certified this patch's origin, then you took the patch
> and you certified it's origin" - per Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
>
> But you, Tang, is the author or the patch, so how can Zhang have touched
> it before you wrote it?
>
> Perhaps you worked on it together? In which case you should include a
> Co-developed-by to indicate this.

I am sorry for the late reply to your email due to some reasons. The 
correct way to write it should be as follows:

     Co-developed-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com>

     Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com>

     Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>

>
>
> Both commit message and patch looks good though!
>
whether should I send v2 for this patch?

Thanks

Tang Bin

>> ---
>>   drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c | 5 +----
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c b/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c
>> index c890e1cec..84cc9fba0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c
>> @@ -929,11 +929,8 @@ static int smbb_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   		int irq;
>>   
>>   		irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, smbb_charger_irqs[i].name);
>> -		if (irq < 0) {
>> -			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get irq '%s'\n",
>> -				smbb_charger_irqs[i].name);
>> +		if (irq < 0)
>>   			return irq;
>> -		}
>>   
>>   		smbb_charger_irqs[i].handler(irq, chg);
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.20.1.windows.1
>>
>>
>>
Sebastian Reichel Aug. 6, 2021, 9:38 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi,

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 09:16:15AM +0800, tangbin wrote:
> Hi, Bjorn Andersson:
> 
> On 2021/7/20 23:52, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Tue 20 Jul 09:15 CDT 2021, Tang Bin wrote:
> > 
> > > In the probe function, when get irq failed, the function
> > > platform_get_irq_byname() logs an error message, so remove
> > > redundant message here.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> > This says "Zhang certified this patch's origin, then you took the patch
> > and you certified it's origin" - per Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> > 
> > But you, Tang, is the author or the patch, so how can Zhang have touched
> > it before you wrote it?
> > 
> > Perhaps you worked on it together? In which case you should include a
> > Co-developed-by to indicate this.
> 
> I am sorry for the late reply to your email due to some reasons. The correct
> way to write it should be as follows:
> 
>     Co-developed-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Both commit message and patch looks good though!
> > 
> whether should I send v2 for this patch?

Thanks, I queued the patch with the Co-developed-by tag.

-- Sebastian

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Tang Bin
> 
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c | 5 +----
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c b/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c
> > > index c890e1cec..84cc9fba0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c
> > > @@ -929,11 +929,8 @@ static int smbb_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >   		int irq;
> > >   		irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, smbb_charger_irqs[i].name);
> > > -		if (irq < 0) {
> > > -			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get irq '%s'\n",
> > > -				smbb_charger_irqs[i].name);
> > > +		if (irq < 0)
> > >   			return irq;
> > > -		}
> > >   		smbb_charger_irqs[i].handler(irq, chg);
> > > -- 
> > > 2.20.1.windows.1
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> 
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c b/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c
index c890e1cec..84cc9fba0 100644
--- a/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c
+++ b/drivers/power/supply/qcom_smbb.c
@@ -929,11 +929,8 @@  static int smbb_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		int irq;
 
 		irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, smbb_charger_irqs[i].name);
-		if (irq < 0) {
-			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get irq '%s'\n",
-				smbb_charger_irqs[i].name);
+		if (irq < 0)
 			return irq;
-		}
 
 		smbb_charger_irqs[i].handler(irq, chg);