@@ -875,11 +875,11 @@ static void rbd_client_release(struct kref *kref)
{
struct rbd_client *rbdc = container_of(kref, struct rbd_client, kref);
- dout("%s: rbdc %p\n", __func__, rbdc);
- spin_lock(&rbd_client_list_lock);
list_del(&rbdc->node);
spin_unlock(&rbd_client_list_lock);
+ dout("%s: rbdc %p\n", __func__, rbdc);
+
ceph_destroy_client(rbdc->client);
kfree(rbdc);
}
@@ -891,7 +891,8 @@ static void rbd_client_release(struct kref *kref)
static void rbd_put_client(struct rbd_client *rbdc)
{
if (rbdc)
- kref_put(&rbdc->kref, rbd_client_release);
+ kref_put_lock(&rbdc->kref,
+ rbd_client_release, &rbd_client_list_lock);
}
/*
When the refcount is decreased to 0, the rbd_client_release() is called. Before CPU0 reaches the race point (1), CPU1 may obtain the spinlock and traverse the linked list to find 'rbdc'. Although CPU1 will call kref_get() to increase the refcount, it is obviously too late. CPU0 will release 'rbdc' directly, CPU1 then accesses 'rbdc' and triggers UAF. Use kref_put_lock() to ensure that both the operations of decrease refcount to 0 and link deletion are lock protected eliminates this risk. CPU0 CPU1 rbd_client_release(): <-------- (1) spin_lock(&rbd_client_list_lock); list_del(&rbdc->node); spin_unlock(&rbd_client_list_lock); kfree(rbdc); <-------- use-after-free Fixes: 602adf400201 ("rbd: introduce rados block device (rbd), based on libceph") Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> --- drivers/block/rbd.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1