| Message ID | 20210729004647.282017-6-richard.henderson@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Unaligned accesses for user-only | expand |
On 7/29/21 2:46 AM, Richard Henderson wrote: > Cc: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> > --- > target/microblaze/cpu.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 01:54, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote: > > Cc: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> > --- > target/microblaze/cpu.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/target/microblaze/cpu.c b/target/microblaze/cpu.c > index 72d8f2a0da..cbec062ed7 100644 > --- a/target/microblaze/cpu.c > +++ b/target/microblaze/cpu.c > @@ -367,11 +367,11 @@ static const struct TCGCPUOps mb_tcg_ops = { > .synchronize_from_tb = mb_cpu_synchronize_from_tb, > .cpu_exec_interrupt = mb_cpu_exec_interrupt, > .tlb_fill = mb_cpu_tlb_fill, > + .do_unaligned_access = mb_cpu_do_unaligned_access, > > #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY > .do_interrupt = mb_cpu_do_interrupt, > .do_transaction_failed = mb_cpu_transaction_failed, > - .do_unaligned_access = mb_cpu_do_unaligned_access, > #endif /* !CONFIG_USER_ONLY */ > }; If I'm reading the kernel sources correctly, for Microblaze it always fixes up unaligned accesses, so for our linux-user code we want "ignore unaligned access errors" rather than reporting them up to cpu-loop.c, I think ? -- PMM
On 7/29/21 3:26 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 01:54, Richard Henderson > <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> Cc: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com> >> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> >> --- >> target/microblaze/cpu.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/target/microblaze/cpu.c b/target/microblaze/cpu.c >> index 72d8f2a0da..cbec062ed7 100644 >> --- a/target/microblaze/cpu.c >> +++ b/target/microblaze/cpu.c >> @@ -367,11 +367,11 @@ static const struct TCGCPUOps mb_tcg_ops = { >> .synchronize_from_tb = mb_cpu_synchronize_from_tb, >> .cpu_exec_interrupt = mb_cpu_exec_interrupt, >> .tlb_fill = mb_cpu_tlb_fill, >> + .do_unaligned_access = mb_cpu_do_unaligned_access, >> >> #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY >> .do_interrupt = mb_cpu_do_interrupt, >> .do_transaction_failed = mb_cpu_transaction_failed, >> - .do_unaligned_access = mb_cpu_do_unaligned_access, >> #endif /* !CONFIG_USER_ONLY */ >> }; > > If I'm reading the kernel sources correctly, for Microblaze it always > fixes up unaligned accesses, so for our linux-user code we want > "ignore unaligned access errors" rather than reporting them up > to cpu-loop.c, I think ? Ah, in that case we should not be setting MO_ALIGN for some -cpu xxx, I think? Or does the MSR_EE bit cover that? Anyway, it looked reachable at first glance. r~
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 08:00:50AM -1000, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 7/29/21 3:26 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 01:54, Richard Henderson > > <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > Cc: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> > > > --- > > > target/microblaze/cpu.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/target/microblaze/cpu.c b/target/microblaze/cpu.c > > > index 72d8f2a0da..cbec062ed7 100644 > > > --- a/target/microblaze/cpu.c > > > +++ b/target/microblaze/cpu.c > > > @@ -367,11 +367,11 @@ static const struct TCGCPUOps mb_tcg_ops = { > > > .synchronize_from_tb = mb_cpu_synchronize_from_tb, > > > .cpu_exec_interrupt = mb_cpu_exec_interrupt, > > > .tlb_fill = mb_cpu_tlb_fill, > > > + .do_unaligned_access = mb_cpu_do_unaligned_access, > > > > > > #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY > > > .do_interrupt = mb_cpu_do_interrupt, > > > .do_transaction_failed = mb_cpu_transaction_failed, > > > - .do_unaligned_access = mb_cpu_do_unaligned_access, > > > #endif /* !CONFIG_USER_ONLY */ > > > }; > > > > If I'm reading the kernel sources correctly, for Microblaze it always > > fixes up unaligned accesses, so for our linux-user code we want > > "ignore unaligned access errors" rather than reporting them up > > to cpu-loop.c, I think ? Yes, I think so. > > Ah, in that case we should not be setting MO_ALIGN for some -cpu xxx, I > think? Or does the MSR_EE bit cover that? Anyway, it looked reachable at > first glance. Hmm yeah, perhaps we shouldn't be setting MO_ALIGN for linux-user... Best regards, Edgar
diff --git a/target/microblaze/cpu.c b/target/microblaze/cpu.c index 72d8f2a0da..cbec062ed7 100644 --- a/target/microblaze/cpu.c +++ b/target/microblaze/cpu.c @@ -367,11 +367,11 @@ static const struct TCGCPUOps mb_tcg_ops = { .synchronize_from_tb = mb_cpu_synchronize_from_tb, .cpu_exec_interrupt = mb_cpu_exec_interrupt, .tlb_fill = mb_cpu_tlb_fill, + .do_unaligned_access = mb_cpu_do_unaligned_access, #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY .do_interrupt = mb_cpu_do_interrupt, .do_transaction_failed = mb_cpu_transaction_failed, - .do_unaligned_access = mb_cpu_do_unaligned_access, #endif /* !CONFIG_USER_ONLY */ };
Cc: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> --- target/microblaze/cpu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.25.1