@@ -461,6 +461,41 @@ static int bpf_fill_stxdw(struct bpf_test *self)
return __bpf_fill_stxdw(self, BPF_DW);
}
+static int bpf_fill_long_jmp(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ unsigned int len = BPF_MAXINSNS;
+ struct bpf_insn *insn;
+ int i;
+
+ insn = kmalloc_array(len, sizeof(*insn), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!insn)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ insn[0] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1);
+ insn[1] = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R0, 1, len - 2 - 1);
+
+ /*
+ * Fill with a complex 64-bit operation that expands to a lot of
+ * instructions on 32-bit JITs. The large jump offset can then
+ * overflow the conditional branch field size, triggering a branch
+ * conversion mechanism in some JITs.
+ *
+ * Note: BPF_MAXINSNS of ALU64 MUL is enough to trigger such branch
+ * conversion on the 32-bit MIPS JIT. For other JITs, the instruction
+ * count and/or operation may need to be modified to trigger the
+ * branch conversion.
+ */
+ for (i = 2; i < len - 1; i++)
+ insn[i] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, R0, (i << 16) + i);
+
+ insn[len - 1] = BPF_EXIT_INSN();
+
+ self->u.ptr.insns = insn;
+ self->u.ptr.len = len;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
{
"TAX",
@@ -6895,6 +6930,14 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
{ },
{ { 0, 1 } },
},
+ { /* Mainly checking JIT here. */
+ "BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long conditional jump",
+ { },
+ INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_long_jmp,
+ },
{
"JMP_JA: Jump, gap, jump, ...",
{ },
Some JITs may need to convert a conditional jump instruction to to short PC-relative branch and a long unconditional jump, if the PC-relative offset exceeds offset field width in the CPU instruction. This test triggers such branch conversion on the 32-bit MIPS JIT. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> --- lib/test_bpf.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)