diff mbox series

[for-6.2,5/7] linux-user: Provide new force_sig_fault() function

Message ID 20210813131809.28655-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
State Superseded
Headers show
Series linux-user: Clean up siginfo_t handling for arm, aarch64 | expand

Commit Message

Peter Maydell Aug. 13, 2021, 1:18 p.m. UTC
In many places in the linux-user code we need to queue a signal for
the guest using the QEMU_SI_FAULT si_type.  This requires that the
caller sets up and passes us a target_siginfo, including setting the
appropriate part of the _sifields union for the si_type. In a number
of places the code forgets to set the _sifields union field.

Provide a new force_sig_fault() function, which does the same thing
as the Linux kernel function of that name -- it takes the signal
number, the si_code value and the address to use in
_sifields._sigfault, and assembles the target_siginfo itself.  This
makes the callsites simpler and means it's harder to forget to pass
in an address value.

We follow force_sig() and the kernel's force_sig_fault() in not
requiring the caller to pass in the CPU pointer but always acting
on the CPU of the current thread.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

---
 linux-user/signal-common.h |  1 +
 linux-user/signal.c        | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)

-- 
2.20.1

Comments

Richard Henderson Aug. 15, 2021, 8:10 p.m. UTC | #1
On 8/13/21 3:18 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> +void force_sig_fault(int sig, int code, abi_ulong addr)


Better as abi_ptr?

Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>


r~
Peter Maydell Aug. 16, 2021, 9:03 a.m. UTC | #2
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 21:10, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>

> On 8/13/21 3:18 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:

> > +void force_sig_fault(int sig, int code, abi_ulong addr)

>

> Better as abi_ptr?


I followed the same type used for 'addr' in the target_siginfo_t
struct definition.

-- PMM
Richard Henderson Aug. 16, 2021, 5:27 p.m. UTC | #3
On 8/15/21 11:03 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 at 21:10, Richard Henderson

> <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:

>>

>> On 8/13/21 3:18 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:

>>> +void force_sig_fault(int sig, int code, abi_ulong addr)

>>

>> Better as abi_ptr?

> 

> I followed the same type used for 'addr' in the target_siginfo_t

> struct definition.


Fair enough.

r~
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/linux-user/signal-common.h b/linux-user/signal-common.h
index ea86328b289..536c7ac2c20 100644
--- a/linux-user/signal-common.h
+++ b/linux-user/signal-common.h
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@  void tswap_siginfo(target_siginfo_t *tinfo,
 void set_sigmask(const sigset_t *set);
 void force_sig(int sig);
 void force_sigsegv(int oldsig);
+void force_sig_fault(int sig, int code, abi_ulong addr);
 #if defined(TARGET_ARCH_HAS_SETUP_FRAME)
 void setup_frame(int sig, struct target_sigaction *ka,
                  target_sigset_t *set, CPUArchState *env);
diff --git a/linux-user/signal.c b/linux-user/signal.c
index fd3c6a3e60d..5ea8e4584a7 100644
--- a/linux-user/signal.c
+++ b/linux-user/signal.c
@@ -646,6 +646,23 @@  void force_sig(int sig)
     queue_signal(env, info.si_signo, QEMU_SI_KILL, &info);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Force a synchronously taken QEMU_SI_FAULT signal. For QEMU the
+ * 'force' part is handled in process_pending_signals().
+ */
+void force_sig_fault(int sig, int code, abi_ulong addr)
+{
+    CPUState *cpu = thread_cpu;
+    CPUArchState *env = cpu->env_ptr;
+    target_siginfo_t info = {};
+
+    info.si_signo = sig;
+    info.si_errno = 0;
+    info.si_code = code;
+    info._sifields._sigfault._addr = addr;
+    queue_signal(env, sig, QEMU_SI_FAULT, &info);
+}
+
 /* Force a SIGSEGV if we couldn't write to memory trying to set
  * up the signal frame. oldsig is the signal we were trying to handle
  * at the point of failure.