Message ID | 20210819154436.117798-6-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/6] dt-bindings: riscv: correct e51 and u54-mc CPU bindings | expand |
Hi Krzysztof, On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 5:45 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> wrote: > pinctrl-names without pinctrl-0 does not have any sense: > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dt.yaml: sdhc@20008000: 'pinctrl-0' is a dependency of 'pinctrl-names' Indeed, and pin control properties should be in the board .dts, not in the SoC .dtsi. > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert
diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi index c4ccd7e4d3eb..d9f7ee747d0d 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi @@ -267,7 +267,6 @@ mmc: mmc@20008000 { reg = <0x0 0x20008000 0x0 0x1000>; interrupt-parent = <&plic>; interrupts = <88>; - pinctrl-names = "default"; clocks = <&clkcfg 6>; bus-width = <4>; max-frequency = <200000000>;
pinctrl-names without pinctrl-0 does not have any sense: arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs-icicle-kit.dt.yaml: sdhc@20008000: 'pinctrl-0' is a dependency of 'pinctrl-names' Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> --- arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/microchip-mpfs.dtsi | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)