diff mbox series

[9/9] s390/block/xpram: add error handling support for add_disk()

Message ID 20210902174105.2418771-10-mcgrof@kernel.org
State New
Headers show
Series block: 5th batch of add_disk() error handling conversions | expand

Commit Message

Luis Chamberlain Sept. 2, 2021, 5:41 p.m. UTC
We never checked for errors on add_disk() as this function
returned void. Now that this is fixed, use the shiny new
error handling.

Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/s390/block/xpram.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Heiko Carstens Sept. 3, 2021, 2:06 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 10:41:05AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> We never checked for errors on add_disk() as this function

> returned void. Now that this is fixed, use the shiny new

> error handling.

> 

> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>

> ---

>  drivers/s390/block/xpram.c | 4 +++-

>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

> 

> diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/xpram.c b/drivers/s390/block/xpram.c

> index ce98fab4d43c..ed3904b6a9c8 100644

> --- a/drivers/s390/block/xpram.c

> +++ b/drivers/s390/block/xpram.c

> @@ -371,7 +371,9 @@ static int __init xpram_setup_blkdev(void)

>  		disk->private_data = &xpram_devices[i];

>  		sprintf(disk->disk_name, "slram%d", i);

>  		set_capacity(disk, xpram_sizes[i] << 1);

> -		add_disk(disk);

> +		rc = add_disk(disk);

> +		if (rc)

> +			goto out;


Hmm, this is a more or less dead device driver, and I'm wondering if
we shouldn't remove it instead. But anyway, your patch is not correct:

- del_gendisk for all registered disks has to be called
- unregister_blkdev(XPRAM_MAJOR, XPRAM_NAME) is missing as well

That would be more or or less xpram_exit with parameter.

You can send a new patch or I can provide a proper one, whatever you
prefer.
Luis Chamberlain Sept. 4, 2021, 1:44 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 04:06:15PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 10:41:05AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:

> > We never checked for errors on add_disk() as this function

> > returned void. Now that this is fixed, use the shiny new

> > error handling.

> > 

> > Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>

> > ---

> >  drivers/s390/block/xpram.c | 4 +++-

> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

> > 

> > diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/xpram.c b/drivers/s390/block/xpram.c

> > index ce98fab4d43c..ed3904b6a9c8 100644

> > --- a/drivers/s390/block/xpram.c

> > +++ b/drivers/s390/block/xpram.c

> > @@ -371,7 +371,9 @@ static int __init xpram_setup_blkdev(void)

> >  		disk->private_data = &xpram_devices[i];

> >  		sprintf(disk->disk_name, "slram%d", i);

> >  		set_capacity(disk, xpram_sizes[i] << 1);

> > -		add_disk(disk);

> > +		rc = add_disk(disk);

> > +		if (rc)

> > +			goto out;

> 

> Hmm, this is a more or less dead device driver, and I'm wondering if

> we shouldn't remove it instead. But anyway, your patch is not correct:

> 

> - del_gendisk for all registered disks has to be called

> - unregister_blkdev(XPRAM_MAJOR, XPRAM_NAME) is missing as well

> 

> That would be more or or less xpram_exit with parameter.

> 

> You can send a new patch or I can provide a proper one, whatever you

> prefer.


You are more familiar with the code so it would be great if you can send
a patch replacement and I will drop mine. I have quite a bit of other
conversions to deal with.

 Luis
'Christoph Hellwig' Sept. 6, 2021, 9:15 a.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 04:06:15PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Hmm, this is a more or less dead device driver, and I'm wondering if
> we shouldn't remove it instead. But anyway, your patch is not correct:

I'm all for removing it.  I think we need to do a little more spring
cleaning on unmaintained and likely to be unused block drivers.
Heiko Carstens Sept. 6, 2021, 2:35 p.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 10:15:40AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 04:06:15PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:

> > Hmm, this is a more or less dead device driver, and I'm wondering if

> > we shouldn't remove it instead. But anyway, your patch is not correct:

> 

> I'm all for removing it.  I think we need to do a little more spring

> cleaning on unmaintained and likely to be unused block drivers.


Yes, we'll remove it. I'll schedule it even for this merge
window. Should be away with -rc1.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/xpram.c b/drivers/s390/block/xpram.c
index ce98fab4d43c..ed3904b6a9c8 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/block/xpram.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/block/xpram.c
@@ -371,7 +371,9 @@  static int __init xpram_setup_blkdev(void)
 		disk->private_data = &xpram_devices[i];
 		sprintf(disk->disk_name, "slram%d", i);
 		set_capacity(disk, xpram_sizes[i] << 1);
-		add_disk(disk);
+		rc = add_disk(disk);
+		if (rc)
+			goto out;
 	}
 
 	return 0;