| Message ID | Ybn8pxv5xPgc5nGz@black.fi.intel.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [GIT,PULL] intel-gpio for 5.17-1 | expand |
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:33 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > Hi Linux GPIO maintainers, > > Approximately a dozen of changes for v5.17 against Intel GPIO drivers and > GPIO ACPI library. It has ben a while in Linux Next without any error reported. > > Thanks, > > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > > The following changes since commit fa55b7dcdc43c1aa1ba12bca9d2dd4318c2a0dbf: > > Linux 5.16-rc1 (2021-11-14 13:56:52 -0800) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > git@gitolite.kernel.org:pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andy/linux-gpio-intel.git tags/intel-gpio-v5.17-1 > > for you to fetch changes up to 9d5f0f6644b1404f40266a2682add712dc9931f5: > > gpio: sch: fix typo in a comment (2021-12-13 13:29:09 +0200) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > intel-gpio for v5.17-1 > > * Don't set type for IRQ already in use in case of ACPI > * Drop unused call from GPIO ACPI library > * Clean up ML IOH and PCH GPIO drivers to make it closer to each other > * Clarify use of register file version in DesignWare driver > > The following is an automated git shortlog grouped by driver: > > dwapb: > - clarify usage of the register file version > > gpiolib: > - acpi: Unify debug and other messages format > - acpi: Do not set the IRQ type if the IRQ is already in use > - acpi: shrink devm_acpi_dev_add_driver_gpios() > - acpi: Remove never used devm_acpi_dev_remove_driver_gpios() > > ml-ioh: > - Change whitespace to match gpio-pch.c > - Use BIT() to match gpio-pch.c > - Cache &pdev->dev to reduce repetition > > pch: > - Cache &pdev->dev to reduce repetition > - Use .driver_data instead of checking Device IDs again > > sch: > - fix typo in a comment > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Andy Shevchenko (4): > gpiolib: acpi: Remove never used devm_acpi_dev_remove_driver_gpios() > gpiolib: acpi: shrink devm_acpi_dev_add_driver_gpios() > gpiolib: acpi: Unify debug and other messages format > gpio: dwapb: clarify usage of the register file version > > Bjorn Helgaas (5): > gpio: pch: Use .driver_data instead of checking Device IDs again > gpio: pch: Cache &pdev->dev to reduce repetition > gpio: ml-ioh: Cache &pdev->dev to reduce repetition > gpio: ml-ioh: Use BIT() to match gpio-pch.c > gpio: ml-ioh: Change whitespace to match gpio-pch.c > > Hans de Goede (1): > gpiolib: acpi: Do not set the IRQ type if the IRQ is already in use > > Jason Wang (1): > gpio: sch: fix typo in a comment > > drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c | 10 +++++---- > drivers/gpio/gpio-ml-ioh.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- > drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++----------------- > drivers/gpio/gpio-sch.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > include/linux/gpio/consumer.h | 2 -- > 6 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-) > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > > Pulled, thanks! Bart
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:14:05AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:33 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Linux GPIO maintainers, > > > > Approximately a dozen of changes for v5.17 against Intel GPIO drivers and > > GPIO ACPI library. It has ben a while in Linux Next without any error reported. > Pulled, thanks! Thanks! Are you going to pull series with the OF node assignments clean up? I forgot to mention here that my PR does not include them.
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:37 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:14:05AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:33 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Linux GPIO maintainers, > > > > > > Approximately a dozen of changes for v5.17 against Intel GPIO drivers and > > > GPIO ACPI library. It has ben a while in Linux Next without any error reported. > > > Pulled, thanks! > > Thanks! > > Are you going to pull series with the OF node assignments clean up? > I forgot to mention here that my PR does not include them. > Yes, I'll queue it this week. Bart
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:46:11PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:37 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:14:05AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:33 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Linux GPIO maintainers, > > > > > > > > Approximately a dozen of changes for v5.17 against Intel GPIO drivers and > > > > GPIO ACPI library. It has ben a while in Linux Next without any error reported. > > > > > Pulled, thanks! > > > > Thanks! > > > > Are you going to pull series with the OF node assignments clean up? > > I forgot to mention here that my PR does not include them. > > > > Yes, I'll queue it this week. Thanks! Do you know that your branches were kicked off from the Linux Next? Are you going to drop previous gpio-sim from the Linux Next?
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 03:05:18PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:46:11PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:37 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:14:05AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:33 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Linux GPIO maintainers, > > > > > > > > > > Approximately a dozen of changes for v5.17 against Intel GPIO drivers and > > > > > GPIO ACPI library. It has ben a while in Linux Next without any error reported. > > > > > > > Pulled, thanks! > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Are you going to pull series with the OF node assignments clean up? > > > I forgot to mention here that my PR does not include them. > > > > > > > Yes, I'll queue it this week. > > Thanks! > > Do you know that your branches were kicked off from the Linux Next? > Are you going to drop previous gpio-sim from the Linux Next? Last seen GPIO for-next $ git tag --contains 9dbd1ab2050 next-20211207 next-20211208 next-20211210 Last seen your old GPIO simulator $ git tag --contains 5065e08e4ef3c DONT-USE-next-20211105 next-20211101 next-20211102 next-20211103 next-20211104 next-20211105 next-20211106 next-20211108 next-20211109 next-20211110 next-20211111 next-20211112 next-20211115 next-20211116 next-20211117 next-20211118 next-20211123 next-20211124 next-20211125 next-20211126 next-20211129 next-20211130 next-20211201 next-20211202 next-20211203 next-20211206 next-20211207 next-20211208 next-20211210 next-20211213 next-20211214 next-20211215
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 2:06 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:46:11PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:37 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:14:05AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 3:33 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Linux GPIO maintainers, > > > > > > > > > > Approximately a dozen of changes for v5.17 against Intel GPIO drivers and > > > > > GPIO ACPI library. It has ben a while in Linux Next without any error reported. > > > > > > > Pulled, thanks! > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Are you going to pull series with the OF node assignments clean up? > > > I forgot to mention here that my PR does not include them. > > > > > > > Yes, I'll queue it this week. > > Thanks! > > Do you know that your branches were kicked off from the Linux Next? > Are you going to drop previous gpio-sim from the Linux Next? > No, I didn't, thanks for the heads-up. Old gpio-sim code conflicted with the one that was queued for v5.17. Should be good now. Bart
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:38 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 2:06 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:46:11PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:37 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:14:05AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: ... > > > > Are you going to pull series with the OF node assignments clean up? > > > > I forgot to mention here that my PR does not include them. > > > > > > Yes, I'll queue it this week. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Do you know that your branches were kicked off from the Linux Next? > > Are you going to drop previous gpio-sim from the Linux Next? > > No, I didn't, thanks for the heads-up. Old gpio-sim code conflicted > with the one that was queued for v5.17. Should be good now. Thanks Btw, I have noticed you rebased your tree, can you, please, do not forget to put --rebase-merges to your `git rebase` command line so the merge won't change commit IDs?
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:53 AM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:38 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 2:06 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:46:11PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:37 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:14:05AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > ... > > > > > > Are you going to pull series with the OF node assignments clean up? > > > > > I forgot to mention here that my PR does not include them. > > > > > > > > Yes, I'll queue it this week. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Do you know that your branches were kicked off from the Linux Next? > > > Are you going to drop previous gpio-sim from the Linux Next? > > > > No, I didn't, thanks for the heads-up. Old gpio-sim code conflicted > > with the one that was queued for v5.17. Should be good now. > > Thanks > > Btw, I have noticed you rebased your tree, can you, please, do not > forget to put --rebase-merges to your `git rebase` command line so the > merge won't change commit IDs? > Oof you saved me from another LinusRant. I already pushed it, let's see if I can get back to the previous state... Bart
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:13 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:53 AM Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:38 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 2:06 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:46:11PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 12:37 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:14:05AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > > > > Are you going to pull series with the OF node assignments clean up? > > > > > > I forgot to mention here that my PR does not include them. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I'll queue it this week. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > Do you know that your branches were kicked off from the Linux Next? > > > > Are you going to drop previous gpio-sim from the Linux Next? > > > > > > No, I didn't, thanks for the heads-up. Old gpio-sim code conflicted > > > with the one that was queued for v5.17. Should be good now. > > > > Thanks > > > > Btw, I have noticed you rebased your tree, can you, please, do not > > forget to put --rebase-merges to your `git rebase` command line so the > > merge won't change commit IDs? > > > > Oof you saved me from another LinusRant. I already pushed it, let's > see if I can get back to the previous state... > Done, reflog is my best friend now. Please take a look if all looks good to you. Bart
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:29:50PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:13 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:53 AM Andy Shevchenko > > <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:38 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: ... > > > Btw, I have noticed you rebased your tree, can you, please, do not > > > forget to put --rebase-merges to your `git rebase` command line so the > > > merge won't change commit IDs? > > > > Oof you saved me from another LinusRant. I already pushed it, let's > > see if I can get back to the previous state... > > Done, reflog is my best friend now. Please take a look if all looks good to you. Looks excellent, thanks!
Hi Linux GPIO maintainers, Approximately a dozen of changes for v5.17 against Intel GPIO drivers and GPIO ACPI library. It has ben a while in Linux Next without any error reported. Thanks, With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko The following changes since commit fa55b7dcdc43c1aa1ba12bca9d2dd4318c2a0dbf: Linux 5.16-rc1 (2021-11-14 13:56:52 -0800) are available in the Git repository at: git@gitolite.kernel.org:pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andy/linux-gpio-intel.git tags/intel-gpio-v5.17-1 for you to fetch changes up to 9d5f0f6644b1404f40266a2682add712dc9931f5: gpio: sch: fix typo in a comment (2021-12-13 13:29:09 +0200) ---------------------------------------------------------------- intel-gpio for v5.17-1 * Don't set type for IRQ already in use in case of ACPI * Drop unused call from GPIO ACPI library * Clean up ML IOH and PCH GPIO drivers to make it closer to each other * Clarify use of register file version in DesignWare driver The following is an automated git shortlog grouped by driver: dwapb: - clarify usage of the register file version gpiolib: - acpi: Unify debug and other messages format - acpi: Do not set the IRQ type if the IRQ is already in use - acpi: shrink devm_acpi_dev_add_driver_gpios() - acpi: Remove never used devm_acpi_dev_remove_driver_gpios() ml-ioh: - Change whitespace to match gpio-pch.c - Use BIT() to match gpio-pch.c - Cache &pdev->dev to reduce repetition pch: - Cache &pdev->dev to reduce repetition - Use .driver_data instead of checking Device IDs again sch: - fix typo in a comment ---------------------------------------------------------------- Andy Shevchenko (4): gpiolib: acpi: Remove never used devm_acpi_dev_remove_driver_gpios() gpiolib: acpi: shrink devm_acpi_dev_add_driver_gpios() gpiolib: acpi: Unify debug and other messages format gpio: dwapb: clarify usage of the register file version Bjorn Helgaas (5): gpio: pch: Use .driver_data instead of checking Device IDs again gpio: pch: Cache &pdev->dev to reduce repetition gpio: ml-ioh: Cache &pdev->dev to reduce repetition gpio: ml-ioh: Use BIT() to match gpio-pch.c gpio: ml-ioh: Change whitespace to match gpio-pch.c Hans de Goede (1): gpiolib: acpi: Do not set the IRQ type if the IRQ is already in use Jason Wang (1): gpio: sch: fix typo in a comment drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c | 10 +++++---- drivers/gpio/gpio-ml-ioh.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++----------------- drivers/gpio/gpio-sch.c | 2 +- drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------ include/linux/gpio/consumer.h | 2 -- 6 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)