| Message ID | 20211217170803.3147777-1-robh@kernel.org |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 07979f09a01e3a3e3bc87064663ffcb7388e0f7f |
| Headers | show |
| Series | dt-bindings: arm,cci-400: Drop the PL330 from example | expand |
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,cci-400.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,cci-400.yaml index 4682f991a5c8..f8530a50863a 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,cci-400.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,cci-400.yaml @@ -166,16 +166,6 @@ examples: }; }; - dma0: dma@3000000 { - /* compatible = "arm,pl330", "arm,primecell"; */ - cci-control-port = <&cci_control0>; - reg = <0x0 0x3000000 0x0 0x1000>; - interrupts = <10>; - #dma-cells = <1>; - #dma-channels = <8>; - #dma-requests = <32>; - }; - cci@2c090000 { compatible = "arm,cci-400"; #address-cells = <1>;
The PL330 was commented out because its binding wasn't converted to a schema. With the binding converted, the example now needs several updates. However, while it's possible that the PL330 has a 'cci-control-port', there aren't any platforms upstream which do. So rather than allowing 'cci-control-port' in the PL330 binding, let's just drop the example. Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,cci-400.yaml | 10 ---------- 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)