diff mbox series

[1/5] ALSA: hda: cs35l41: Avoid overwriting register patch

Message ID 20220113170728.1953559-1-tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com
State New
Headers show
Series [1/5] ALSA: hda: cs35l41: Avoid overwriting register patch | expand

Commit Message

Lucas tanure Jan. 13, 2022, 5:07 p.m. UTC
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>

regmap_register_patch can't be used to apply the probe sequence as a
patch is already registers with the regmap by
cs35l41_register_errata_patch and only a single patch can be attached to
a single regmap. The driver doesn't currently rely on a cache sync to
re-apply this probe sequence so simply switch it to a multi write.

Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com>
---
 sound/pci/hda/cs35l41_hda.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Cezary Rojewski Jan. 14, 2022, 4:06 p.m. UTC | #1
On 2022-01-13 6:07 PM, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
> 
> regmap_register_patch can't be used to apply the probe sequence as a
> patch is already registers with the regmap by
> cs35l41_register_errata_patch and only a single patch can be attached to
> a single regmap. The driver doesn't currently rely on a cache sync to
> re-apply this probe sequence so simply switch it to a multi write.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com>

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but this change looks like a fix for the 
previously added commit:
ALSA: hda: cs35l41: Add support for CS35L41 in HDA systems

and so it would be good to append appropriate 'Fixes' tag here.

> ---
>   sound/pci/hda/cs35l41_hda.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/cs35l41_hda.c b/sound/pci/hda/cs35l41_hda.c
> index 30b40d865863..c47c5f0b4e59 100644
> --- a/sound/pci/hda/cs35l41_hda.c
> +++ b/sound/pci/hda/cs35l41_hda.c
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ int cs35l41_hda_probe(struct device *dev, const char *device_name, int id, int i
>   	acpi_hw_cfg = NULL;
>   
>   	if (cs35l41->reg_seq->probe) {
> -		ret = regmap_register_patch(cs35l41->regmap, cs35l41->reg_seq->probe,
> +		ret = regmap_multi_reg_write(cs35l41->regmap, cs35l41->reg_seq->probe,
>   					    cs35l41->reg_seq->num_probe);
>   		if (ret) {
>   			dev_err(cs35l41->dev, "Fail to apply probe reg patch: %d\n", ret);
>
Rafael J. Wysocki Jan. 14, 2022, 5:51 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 5:19 PM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:07:28 +0100,
> Lucas Tanure wrote:
> >
> > The ACPI device with CLSA0100 is a sound card with
> > multiple instances of CS35L41 connected by I2C to
> > the main CPU.
> >
> > We add an ID to the i2c_multi_instantiate_idsi list
> > to enumerate all I2C slaves correctly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com>
>
> I think it's better to merge this from sound git tree together with
> others in the patch set, presumably for rc1.
>
> It'd be great if ACPI people can take a review and give an ack/nack.

Hans, what do you think?

> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/scan.c                          | 2 ++
> >  drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 8 ++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > index c215bc8723d0..2a68031d953e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -1753,6 +1753,8 @@ static bool acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent(struct acpi_device *device)
> >        */
> >               {"BCM4752", },
> >               {"LNV4752", },
> > +     /* Non-conforming _HID for Cirrus Logic already released */
> > +             {"CLSA0100", },
> >               {}
> >       };
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c b/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
> > index 4956a1df5b90..a51a74933fa9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
> > @@ -147,6 +147,12 @@ static const struct i2c_inst_data int3515_data[]  = {
> >       {}
> >  };
> >
> > +static const struct i2c_inst_data cs35l41_hda[] = {
> > +     { "cs35l41-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
> > +     { "cs35l41-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
> > +     {}
> > +};
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Note new device-ids must also be added to i2c_multi_instantiate_ids in
> >   * drivers/acpi/scan.c: acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent().
> > @@ -155,6 +161,8 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids[] = {
> >       { "BSG1160", (unsigned long)bsg1160_data },
> >       { "BSG2150", (unsigned long)bsg2150_data },
> >       { "INT3515", (unsigned long)int3515_data },
> > +     /* Non-conforming _HID for Cirrus Logic already released */
> > +     { "CLSA0100", (unsigned long)cs35l41_hda },
> >       { }
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids);
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
Hans de Goede Jan. 14, 2022, 6:56 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi,

On 1/14/22 18:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 5:19 PM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:07:28 +0100,
>> Lucas Tanure wrote:
>>>
>>> The ACPI device with CLSA0100 is a sound card with
>>> multiple instances of CS35L41 connected by I2C to
>>> the main CPU.
>>>
>>> We add an ID to the i2c_multi_instantiate_idsi list
>>> to enumerate all I2C slaves correctly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com>
>>
>> I think it's better to merge this from sound git tree together with
>> others in the patch set, presumably for rc1.
>>
>> It'd be great if ACPI people can take a review and give an ack/nack.
> 
> Hans, what do you think?

This patch (5/5) applies on top of:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20211210154050.3713-1-sbinding@opensource.cirrus.com/

Which still needs some work and which really should be merged
through the ACPI tree. IMHO it would be best to simply drop
this (5/5) from this series and move it to the v3 of the
series which I've linked to above.

1-4 can be merged through the alsa tree independently of 5/5 AFAIK.

Regards,

Hans




> 
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/acpi/scan.c                          | 2 ++
>>>  drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 8 ++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>>> index c215bc8723d0..2a68031d953e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>>> @@ -1753,6 +1753,8 @@ static bool acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent(struct acpi_device *device)
>>>        */
>>>               {"BCM4752", },
>>>               {"LNV4752", },
>>> +     /* Non-conforming _HID for Cirrus Logic already released */
>>> +             {"CLSA0100", },
>>>               {}
>>>       };
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c b/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
>>> index 4956a1df5b90..a51a74933fa9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
>>> @@ -147,6 +147,12 @@ static const struct i2c_inst_data int3515_data[]  = {
>>>       {}
>>>  };
>>>
>>> +static const struct i2c_inst_data cs35l41_hda[] = {
>>> +     { "cs35l41-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
>>> +     { "cs35l41-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
>>> +     {}
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>  /*
>>>   * Note new device-ids must also be added to i2c_multi_instantiate_ids in
>>>   * drivers/acpi/scan.c: acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent().
>>> @@ -155,6 +161,8 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids[] = {
>>>       { "BSG1160", (unsigned long)bsg1160_data },
>>>       { "BSG2150", (unsigned long)bsg2150_data },
>>>       { "INT3515", (unsigned long)int3515_data },
>>> +     /* Non-conforming _HID for Cirrus Logic already released */
>>> +     { "CLSA0100", (unsigned long)cs35l41_hda },
>>>       { }
>>>  };
>>>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids);
>>> --
>>> 2.34.1
>>>
>
Takashi Iwai Jan. 15, 2022, 6:59 a.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:56:04 +0100,
Hans de Goede wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 1/14/22 18:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 5:19 PM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:07:28 +0100,
> >> Lucas Tanure wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The ACPI device with CLSA0100 is a sound card with
> >>> multiple instances of CS35L41 connected by I2C to
> >>> the main CPU.
> >>>
> >>> We add an ID to the i2c_multi_instantiate_idsi list
> >>> to enumerate all I2C slaves correctly.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com>
> >>
> >> I think it's better to merge this from sound git tree together with
> >> others in the patch set, presumably for rc1.
> >>
> >> It'd be great if ACPI people can take a review and give an ack/nack.
> > 
> > Hans, what do you think?
> 
> This patch (5/5) applies on top of:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20211210154050.3713-1-sbinding@opensource.cirrus.com/
> 
> Which still needs some work and which really should be merged
> through the ACPI tree. IMHO it would be best to simply drop
> this (5/5) from this series and move it to the v3 of the
> series which I've linked to above.
> 
> 1-4 can be merged through the alsa tree independently of 5/5 AFAIK.

OK, that's fine.

Lucas, could you submit v3 patches in the suggested way?


thanks,

Takashi
Lucas tanure Jan. 17, 2022, 10:47 a.m. UTC | #5
On 1/15/22 6:59 AM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:56:04 +0100,
> Hans de Goede wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 1/14/22 18:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 5:19 PM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 18:07:28 +0100,
> >>> Lucas Tanure wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The ACPI device with CLSA0100 is a sound card with
> >>>> multiple instances of CS35L41 connected by I2C to
> >>>> the main CPU.
> >>>>
> >>>> We add an ID to the i2c_multi_instantiate_idsi list
> >>>> to enumerate all I2C slaves correctly.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com>
> >>>
> >>> I think it's better to merge this from sound git tree together with
> >>> others in the patch set, presumably for rc1.
> >>>
> >>> It'd be great if ACPI people can take a review and give an ack/nack.
> >>
> >> Hans, what do you think?
> >
> > This patch (5/5) applies on top of:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20211210154050.3713-1-sbinding@opensource.cirrus.com/
> >
> > Which still needs some work and which really should be merged
> > through the ACPI tree. IMHO it would be best to simply drop
> > this (5/5) from this series and move it to the v3 of the
> > series which I've linked to above.
> >
> > 1-4 can be merged through the alsa tree independently of 5/5 AFAIK.
> 
> OK, that's fine.
> 
> Lucas, could you submit v3 patches in the suggested way?
Yes, we will do that.
Thanks
> 
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Takashi
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/cs35l41_hda.c b/sound/pci/hda/cs35l41_hda.c
index 30b40d865863..c47c5f0b4e59 100644
--- a/sound/pci/hda/cs35l41_hda.c
+++ b/sound/pci/hda/cs35l41_hda.c
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@  int cs35l41_hda_probe(struct device *dev, const char *device_name, int id, int i
 	acpi_hw_cfg = NULL;
 
 	if (cs35l41->reg_seq->probe) {
-		ret = regmap_register_patch(cs35l41->regmap, cs35l41->reg_seq->probe,
+		ret = regmap_multi_reg_write(cs35l41->regmap, cs35l41->reg_seq->probe,
 					    cs35l41->reg_seq->num_probe);
 		if (ret) {
 			dev_err(cs35l41->dev, "Fail to apply probe reg patch: %d\n", ret);