| Message ID | 0f536cd8-01db-5d16-2cec-ec6d19409a49@xs4all.nl |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 7795686d573de0438bba6b2b344e6b203223c889 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [for,5.17] pinctrl-sunxi: sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_in/output: use correct offset | expand |
Hi Hans! Dne sreda, 26. januar 2022 ob 12:02:04 CET je Hans Verkuil napisal(a): > The commit that sets the direction directly without calling > pinctrl_gpio_direction(), forgot to add chip->base to the offset when > calling sunxi_pmx_gpio_set_direction(). > > This caused failures for various Allwinner boards which have two > GPIO blocks. > > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl> > Reported-by: 5kft <5kft@5kft.org> > Suggested-by: 5kft <5kft@5kft.org> > Reported-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> > Fixes: 8df89a7cbc63 (pinctrl-sunxi: don't call pinctrl_gpio_direction()) > Tested-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> Next time please send to all sunxi maintainers/reviewers and mailing list. Tested-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> Best regards, Jernej > --- > Corentin, can you please test this patch to verify that this fixes your > issue on the orangepiPC? > --- > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/ pinctrl-sunxi.c > index 80d6750c74a6..061323eab8b1 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c > @@ -837,7 +837,8 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, > { > struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > > - return sunxi_pmx_gpio_set_direction(pctl->pctl_dev, NULL, offset, true); > + return sunxi_pmx_gpio_set_direction(pctl->pctl_dev, NULL, > + chip->base + offset, true); > } > > static int sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) > @@ -890,7 +891,8 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, > struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > > sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_set(chip, offset, value); > - return sunxi_pmx_gpio_set_direction(pctl->pctl_dev, NULL, offset, false); > + return sunxi_pmx_gpio_set_direction(pctl->pctl_dev, NULL, > + chip->base + offset, false); > } > > static int sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_of_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc, >
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 12:02:04PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > The commit that sets the direction directly without calling > pinctrl_gpio_direction(), forgot to add chip->base to the offset when > calling sunxi_pmx_gpio_set_direction(). > > This caused failures for various Allwinner boards which have two > GPIO blocks. > > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl> > Reported-by: 5kft <5kft@5kft.org> > Suggested-by: 5kft <5kft@5kft.org> > Reported-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> > Fixes: 8df89a7cbc63 (pinctrl-sunxi: don't call pinctrl_gpio_direction()) > Tested-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> > Tested-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> > Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Guenter > --- > Corentin, can you please test this patch to verify that this fixes your > issue on the orangepiPC? > --- > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c > index 80d6750c74a6..061323eab8b1 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c > @@ -837,7 +837,8 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, > { > struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > > - return sunxi_pmx_gpio_set_direction(pctl->pctl_dev, NULL, offset, true); > + return sunxi_pmx_gpio_set_direction(pctl->pctl_dev, NULL, > + chip->base + offset, true); > } > > static int sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) > @@ -890,7 +891,8 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, > struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(chip); > > sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_set(chip, offset, value); > - return sunxi_pmx_gpio_set_direction(pctl->pctl_dev, NULL, offset, false); > + return sunxi_pmx_gpio_set_direction(pctl->pctl_dev, NULL, > + chip->base + offset, false); > } > > static int sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_of_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc,
Hi, On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 12:02:04PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > The commit that sets the direction directly without calling > pinctrl_gpio_direction(), forgot to add chip->base to the offset when > calling sunxi_pmx_gpio_set_direction(). > > This caused failures for various Allwinner boards which have two > GPIO blocks. > > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl> > Reported-by: 5kft <5kft@5kft.org> > Suggested-by: 5kft <5kft@5kft.org> > Reported-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> > Fixes: 8df89a7cbc63 (pinctrl-sunxi: don't call pinctrl_gpio_direction()) > Tested-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> > Tested-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> > Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> > Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Unfortunately, this patch causes (or exposes) a secondary problem. When applied, the following traceback is seen during reboot. Requesting system reboot [ 30.899594] [ 30.899685] ============================================ [ 30.899757] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 30.899938] 5.17.0-rc3-00394-gc849047c2473 #1 Not tainted [ 30.900055] -------------------------------------------- [ 30.900124] init/307 is trying to acquire lock: [ 30.900246] c2dfe27c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x58/0xa0 [ 30.900900] [ 30.900900] but task is already holding lock: [ 30.900974] c3c0ac7c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x58/0xa0 [ 30.901101] [ 30.901101] other info that might help us debug this: [ 30.901188] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 30.901188] [ 30.901262] CPU0 [ 30.901301] ---- [ 30.901339] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); [ 30.901411] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); [ 30.901480] [ 30.901480] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 30.901480] [ 30.901554] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 30.901554] [ 30.901657] 4 locks held by init/307: [ 30.901724] #0: c1f29f18 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __do_sys_reboot+0x90/0x23c [ 30.901889] #1: c20f7760 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_shutdown+0xf4/0x224 [ 30.902016] #2: c2e804d8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_shutdown+0x104/0x224 [ 30.902138] #3: c3c0ac7c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x58/0xa0 [ 30.902281] [ 30.902281] stack backtrace: [ 30.902462] CPU: 0 PID: 307 Comm: init Not tainted 5.17.0-rc3-00394-gc849047c2473 #1 [ 30.902572] Hardware name: Allwinner sun8i Family [ 30.902781] unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 [ 30.902895] show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x90 [ 30.902970] dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x1680/0x31a0 [ 30.903047] __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x148/0x3dc [ 30.903118] lock_acquire from _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x6c [ 30.903197] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave from __irq_get_desc_lock+0x58/0xa0 [ 30.903282] __irq_get_desc_lock from irq_set_irq_wake+0x2c/0x19c [ 30.903366] irq_set_irq_wake from irq_set_irq_wake+0x13c/0x19c [ 30.903442] irq_set_irq_wake from gpio_keys_suspend+0x80/0x1a4 [ 30.903523] gpio_keys_suspend from gpio_keys_shutdown+0x10/0x2c [ 30.903603] gpio_keys_shutdown from device_shutdown+0x180/0x224 [ 30.903685] device_shutdown from __do_sys_reboot+0x134/0x23c [ 30.903764] __do_sys_reboot from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c [ 30.903894] Exception stack(0xc584ffa8 to 0xc584fff0) [ 30.904013] ffa0: 01234567 000c623f fee1dead 28121969 01234567 00000000 [ 30.904117] ffc0: 01234567 000c623f 00000001 00000058 000d85c0 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 30.904213] ffe0: 000d8298 be84ddf4 000918bc b6eb0edc [ 30.905189] reboot: Restarting system ------------ Bisect log is attached. Guenter --- # bad: [c849047c2473f78306791b27ec7c3e0ed552727d] Merge branch 'for-linux-next-fixes' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc # good: [dfd42facf1e4ada021b939b4e19c935dcdd55566] Linux 5.17-rc3 git bisect start 'HEAD' 'v5.17-rc3' # good: [a0eafda3873b900f2bfa2bac738583493b458338] Merge branch 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec.git git bisect good a0eafda3873b900f2bfa2bac738583493b458338 # good: [b7bbfc1f46f45e896928c301cd02fb530ed426f3] Merge branch 'fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git git bisect good b7bbfc1f46f45e896928c301cd02fb530ed426f3 # bad: [2af1645572f8fef201a7d2a891f328ed94509135] Merge branch 'rtc-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux.git git bisect bad 2af1645572f8fef201a7d2a891f328ed94509135 # bad: [e3d76bb86c683b05afe4a3b73fd1d50ea7a294be] Merge branch 'hwmon' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git git bisect bad e3d76bb86c683b05afe4a3b73fd1d50ea7a294be # good: [b55a65e66f178b3507554260b4f3d56bc7b445b6] Merge branch 'fixes' of git://linuxtv.org/mchehab/media-next.git git bisect good b55a65e66f178b3507554260b4f3d56bc7b445b6 # good: [2b0ecccb55310a4b8ad5d59c703cf8c821be6260] KVM: x86: nSVM: deal with L1 hypervisor that intercepts interrupts but lets L2 control them git bisect good 2b0ecccb55310a4b8ad5d59c703cf8c821be6260 # good: [fcb732d8f8cf6084f8480015ad41d25fb023a4dd] KVM: x86/xen: Fix runstate updates to be atomic when preempting vCPU git bisect good fcb732d8f8cf6084f8480015ad41d25fb023a4dd # bad: [bb9bb9c75482aa008cfc62b5cb88681de8408fa3] hwmon: (ntc_thermistor) Underscore Samsung thermistor git bisect bad bb9bb9c75482aa008cfc62b5cb88681de8408fa3 # bad: [3c5412cdec9f6e417e7757974040e461df4a7238] pinctrl-sunxi: sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_in/output: use correct offset git bisect bad 3c5412cdec9f6e417e7757974040e461df4a7238 # first bad commit: [3c5412cdec9f6e417e7757974040e461df4a7238] pinctrl-sunxi: sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_in/output: use correct offset
Hi Guenter, On 2/13/22 21:42, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 12:02:04PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> The commit that sets the direction directly without calling >> pinctrl_gpio_direction(), forgot to add chip->base to the offset when >> calling sunxi_pmx_gpio_set_direction(). >> >> This caused failures for various Allwinner boards which have two >> GPIO blocks. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl> >> Reported-by: 5kft <5kft@5kft.org> >> Suggested-by: 5kft <5kft@5kft.org> >> Reported-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> >> Fixes: 8df89a7cbc63 (pinctrl-sunxi: don't call pinctrl_gpio_direction()) >> Tested-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> >> Tested-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> >> Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> >> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> > > Unfortunately, this patch causes (or exposes) a secondary problem. > When applied, the following traceback is seen during reboot. I've been digging through the code, but I can't really see how this patch would give this result. The backtrace isn't very informative. I suspect it ends up in sunxi_pinctrl_irq_set_wake(). Can you debug this a bit? Esp. logging the d->hwirq value would be useful (and comparing it with and without this patch). Of course, I may be wrong and the issue isn't in that function at all. One possibility is that there is another offset missing somewhere in this code that hasn't been noticed before. Regards, Hans > > Requesting system reboot > [ 30.899594] > [ 30.899685] ============================================ > [ 30.899757] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected > [ 30.899938] 5.17.0-rc3-00394-gc849047c2473 #1 Not tainted > [ 30.900055] -------------------------------------------- > [ 30.900124] init/307 is trying to acquire lock: > [ 30.900246] c2dfe27c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x58/0xa0 > [ 30.900900] > [ 30.900900] but task is already holding lock: > [ 30.900974] c3c0ac7c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x58/0xa0 > [ 30.901101] > [ 30.901101] other info that might help us debug this: > [ 30.901188] Possible unsafe locking scenario: > [ 30.901188] > [ 30.901262] CPU0 > [ 30.901301] ---- > [ 30.901339] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); > [ 30.901411] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); > [ 30.901480] > [ 30.901480] *** DEADLOCK *** > [ 30.901480] > [ 30.901554] May be due to missing lock nesting notation > [ 30.901554] > [ 30.901657] 4 locks held by init/307: > [ 30.901724] #0: c1f29f18 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __do_sys_reboot+0x90/0x23c > [ 30.901889] #1: c20f7760 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_shutdown+0xf4/0x224 > [ 30.902016] #2: c2e804d8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_shutdown+0x104/0x224 > [ 30.902138] #3: c3c0ac7c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x58/0xa0 > [ 30.902281] > [ 30.902281] stack backtrace: > [ 30.902462] CPU: 0 PID: 307 Comm: init Not tainted 5.17.0-rc3-00394-gc849047c2473 #1 > [ 30.902572] Hardware name: Allwinner sun8i Family > [ 30.902781] unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 > [ 30.902895] show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x90 > [ 30.902970] dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x1680/0x31a0 > [ 30.903047] __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x148/0x3dc > [ 30.903118] lock_acquire from _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x6c > [ 30.903197] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave from __irq_get_desc_lock+0x58/0xa0 > [ 30.903282] __irq_get_desc_lock from irq_set_irq_wake+0x2c/0x19c > [ 30.903366] irq_set_irq_wake from irq_set_irq_wake+0x13c/0x19c > [ 30.903442] irq_set_irq_wake from gpio_keys_suspend+0x80/0x1a4 > [ 30.903523] gpio_keys_suspend from gpio_keys_shutdown+0x10/0x2c > [ 30.903603] gpio_keys_shutdown from device_shutdown+0x180/0x224 > [ 30.903685] device_shutdown from __do_sys_reboot+0x134/0x23c > [ 30.903764] __do_sys_reboot from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c > [ 30.903894] Exception stack(0xc584ffa8 to 0xc584fff0) > [ 30.904013] ffa0: 01234567 000c623f fee1dead 28121969 01234567 00000000 > [ 30.904117] ffc0: 01234567 000c623f 00000001 00000058 000d85c0 00000000 00000000 00000000 > [ 30.904213] ffe0: 000d8298 be84ddf4 000918bc b6eb0edc > [ 30.905189] reboot: Restarting system > ------------ > > Bisect log is attached. > > Guenter > > --- > # bad: [c849047c2473f78306791b27ec7c3e0ed552727d] Merge branch 'for-linux-next-fixes' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc > # good: [dfd42facf1e4ada021b939b4e19c935dcdd55566] Linux 5.17-rc3 > git bisect start 'HEAD' 'v5.17-rc3' > # good: [a0eafda3873b900f2bfa2bac738583493b458338] Merge branch 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec.git > git bisect good a0eafda3873b900f2bfa2bac738583493b458338 > # good: [b7bbfc1f46f45e896928c301cd02fb530ed426f3] Merge branch 'fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git > git bisect good b7bbfc1f46f45e896928c301cd02fb530ed426f3 > # bad: [2af1645572f8fef201a7d2a891f328ed94509135] Merge branch 'rtc-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux.git > git bisect bad 2af1645572f8fef201a7d2a891f328ed94509135 > # bad: [e3d76bb86c683b05afe4a3b73fd1d50ea7a294be] Merge branch 'hwmon' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git > git bisect bad e3d76bb86c683b05afe4a3b73fd1d50ea7a294be > # good: [b55a65e66f178b3507554260b4f3d56bc7b445b6] Merge branch 'fixes' of git://linuxtv.org/mchehab/media-next.git > git bisect good b55a65e66f178b3507554260b4f3d56bc7b445b6 > # good: [2b0ecccb55310a4b8ad5d59c703cf8c821be6260] KVM: x86: nSVM: deal with L1 hypervisor that intercepts interrupts but lets L2 control them > git bisect good 2b0ecccb55310a4b8ad5d59c703cf8c821be6260 > # good: [fcb732d8f8cf6084f8480015ad41d25fb023a4dd] KVM: x86/xen: Fix runstate updates to be atomic when preempting vCPU > git bisect good fcb732d8f8cf6084f8480015ad41d25fb023a4dd > # bad: [bb9bb9c75482aa008cfc62b5cb88681de8408fa3] hwmon: (ntc_thermistor) Underscore Samsung thermistor > git bisect bad bb9bb9c75482aa008cfc62b5cb88681de8408fa3 > # bad: [3c5412cdec9f6e417e7757974040e461df4a7238] pinctrl-sunxi: sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_in/output: use correct offset > git bisect bad 3c5412cdec9f6e417e7757974040e461df4a7238 > # first bad commit: [3c5412cdec9f6e417e7757974040e461df4a7238] pinctrl-sunxi: sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_in/output: use correct offset
On 2/14/22 00:44, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > On 2/13/22 21:42, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 12:02:04PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: >>> The commit that sets the direction directly without calling >>> pinctrl_gpio_direction(), forgot to add chip->base to the offset when >>> calling sunxi_pmx_gpio_set_direction(). >>> >>> This caused failures for various Allwinner boards which have two >>> GPIO blocks. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl> >>> Reported-by: 5kft <5kft@5kft.org> >>> Suggested-by: 5kft <5kft@5kft.org> >>> Reported-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> >>> Fixes: 8df89a7cbc63 (pinctrl-sunxi: don't call pinctrl_gpio_direction()) >>> Tested-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> >>> Tested-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> >>> Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> >>> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> >> >> Unfortunately, this patch causes (or exposes) a secondary problem. >> When applied, the following traceback is seen during reboot. > > I've been digging through the code, but I can't really see how this patch would > give this result. The backtrace isn't very informative. > > I suspect it ends up in sunxi_pinctrl_irq_set_wake(). Can you debug this a bit? > Esp. logging the d->hwirq value would be useful (and comparing it with and without > this patch). Of course, I may be wrong and the issue isn't in that function at all. > > One possibility is that there is another offset missing somewhere in this code > that hasn't been noticed before. > Initial finding is that your second patch doesn't introduce the problem. it appears that it uncovers a problem that was hidden by commit 8df89a7cbc ("pinctrl-sunxi: don't call pinctrl_gpio_direction()"). If I revert both this patch and commit 8df89a7cbc in linux-next, I also see the traceback. I do not see the traceback in v5.16. I do see the traceback in v5.17-rc4 after applying this patch. I am currently trying to bisect between v5.16 and v5.17-rc4. Guenter > Regards, > > Hans > >> >> Requesting system reboot >> [ 30.899594] >> [ 30.899685] ============================================ >> [ 30.899757] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected >> [ 30.899938] 5.17.0-rc3-00394-gc849047c2473 #1 Not tainted >> [ 30.900055] -------------------------------------------- >> [ 30.900124] init/307 is trying to acquire lock: >> [ 30.900246] c2dfe27c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x58/0xa0 >> [ 30.900900] >> [ 30.900900] but task is already holding lock: >> [ 30.900974] c3c0ac7c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x58/0xa0 >> [ 30.901101] >> [ 30.901101] other info that might help us debug this: >> [ 30.901188] Possible unsafe locking scenario: >> [ 30.901188] >> [ 30.901262] CPU0 >> [ 30.901301] ---- >> [ 30.901339] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); >> [ 30.901411] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); >> [ 30.901480] >> [ 30.901480] *** DEADLOCK *** >> [ 30.901480] >> [ 30.901554] May be due to missing lock nesting notation >> [ 30.901554] >> [ 30.901657] 4 locks held by init/307: >> [ 30.901724] #0: c1f29f18 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __do_sys_reboot+0x90/0x23c >> [ 30.901889] #1: c20f7760 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_shutdown+0xf4/0x224 >> [ 30.902016] #2: c2e804d8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_shutdown+0x104/0x224 >> [ 30.902138] #3: c3c0ac7c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x58/0xa0 >> [ 30.902281] >> [ 30.902281] stack backtrace: >> [ 30.902462] CPU: 0 PID: 307 Comm: init Not tainted 5.17.0-rc3-00394-gc849047c2473 #1 >> [ 30.902572] Hardware name: Allwinner sun8i Family >> [ 30.902781] unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 >> [ 30.902895] show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x90 >> [ 30.902970] dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x1680/0x31a0 >> [ 30.903047] __lock_acquire from lock_acquire+0x148/0x3dc >> [ 30.903118] lock_acquire from _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x6c >> [ 30.903197] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave from __irq_get_desc_lock+0x58/0xa0 >> [ 30.903282] __irq_get_desc_lock from irq_set_irq_wake+0x2c/0x19c >> [ 30.903366] irq_set_irq_wake from irq_set_irq_wake+0x13c/0x19c >> [ 30.903442] irq_set_irq_wake from gpio_keys_suspend+0x80/0x1a4 >> [ 30.903523] gpio_keys_suspend from gpio_keys_shutdown+0x10/0x2c >> [ 30.903603] gpio_keys_shutdown from device_shutdown+0x180/0x224 >> [ 30.903685] device_shutdown from __do_sys_reboot+0x134/0x23c >> [ 30.903764] __do_sys_reboot from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c >> [ 30.903894] Exception stack(0xc584ffa8 to 0xc584fff0) >> [ 30.904013] ffa0: 01234567 000c623f fee1dead 28121969 01234567 00000000 >> [ 30.904117] ffc0: 01234567 000c623f 00000001 00000058 000d85c0 00000000 00000000 00000000 >> [ 30.904213] ffe0: 000d8298 be84ddf4 000918bc b6eb0edc >> [ 30.905189] reboot: Restarting system >> ------------ >> >> Bisect log is attached. >> >> Guenter >> >> --- >> # bad: [c849047c2473f78306791b27ec7c3e0ed552727d] Merge branch 'for-linux-next-fixes' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc >> # good: [dfd42facf1e4ada021b939b4e19c935dcdd55566] Linux 5.17-rc3 >> git bisect start 'HEAD' 'v5.17-rc3' >> # good: [a0eafda3873b900f2bfa2bac738583493b458338] Merge branch 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec.git >> git bisect good a0eafda3873b900f2bfa2bac738583493b458338 >> # good: [b7bbfc1f46f45e896928c301cd02fb530ed426f3] Merge branch 'fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git >> git bisect good b7bbfc1f46f45e896928c301cd02fb530ed426f3 >> # bad: [2af1645572f8fef201a7d2a891f328ed94509135] Merge branch 'rtc-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux.git >> git bisect bad 2af1645572f8fef201a7d2a891f328ed94509135 >> # bad: [e3d76bb86c683b05afe4a3b73fd1d50ea7a294be] Merge branch 'hwmon' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git >> git bisect bad e3d76bb86c683b05afe4a3b73fd1d50ea7a294be >> # good: [b55a65e66f178b3507554260b4f3d56bc7b445b6] Merge branch 'fixes' of git://linuxtv.org/mchehab/media-next.git >> git bisect good b55a65e66f178b3507554260b4f3d56bc7b445b6 >> # good: [2b0ecccb55310a4b8ad5d59c703cf8c821be6260] KVM: x86: nSVM: deal with L1 hypervisor that intercepts interrupts but lets L2 control them >> git bisect good 2b0ecccb55310a4b8ad5d59c703cf8c821be6260 >> # good: [fcb732d8f8cf6084f8480015ad41d25fb023a4dd] KVM: x86/xen: Fix runstate updates to be atomic when preempting vCPU >> git bisect good fcb732d8f8cf6084f8480015ad41d25fb023a4dd >> # bad: [bb9bb9c75482aa008cfc62b5cb88681de8408fa3] hwmon: (ntc_thermistor) Underscore Samsung thermistor >> git bisect bad bb9bb9c75482aa008cfc62b5cb88681de8408fa3 >> # bad: [3c5412cdec9f6e417e7757974040e461df4a7238] pinctrl-sunxi: sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_in/output: use correct offset >> git bisect bad 3c5412cdec9f6e417e7757974040e461df4a7238 >> # first bad commit: [3c5412cdec9f6e417e7757974040e461df4a7238] pinctrl-sunxi: sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_in/output: use correct offset
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c index 80d6750c74a6..061323eab8b1 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c @@ -837,7 +837,8 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, { struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(chip); - return sunxi_pmx_gpio_set_direction(pctl->pctl_dev, NULL, offset, true); + return sunxi_pmx_gpio_set_direction(pctl->pctl_dev, NULL, + chip->base + offset, true); } static int sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) @@ -890,7 +891,8 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(chip); sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_set(chip, offset, value); - return sunxi_pmx_gpio_set_direction(pctl->pctl_dev, NULL, offset, false); + return sunxi_pmx_gpio_set_direction(pctl->pctl_dev, NULL, + chip->base + offset, false); } static int sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_of_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc,
The commit that sets the direction directly without calling pinctrl_gpio_direction(), forgot to add chip->base to the offset when calling sunxi_pmx_gpio_set_direction(). This caused failures for various Allwinner boards which have two GPIO blocks. Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl> Reported-by: 5kft <5kft@5kft.org> Suggested-by: 5kft <5kft@5kft.org> Reported-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> Fixes: 8df89a7cbc63 (pinctrl-sunxi: don't call pinctrl_gpio_direction()) --- Corentin, can you please test this patch to verify that this fixes your issue on the orangepiPC? ---