@@ -72,12 +72,15 @@ int mfill_atomic_install_pte(struct mm_s
_dst_pte = pte_mkdirty(_dst_pte);
if (page_in_cache && !vm_shared)
writable = false;
- if (writable) {
- if (wp_copy)
- _dst_pte = pte_mkuffd_wp(_dst_pte);
- else
- _dst_pte = pte_mkwrite(_dst_pte);
- }
+
+ /*
+ * Always mark a PTE as write-protected when needed, regardless of
+ * VM_WRITE, which the user might change.
+ */
+ if (wp_copy)
+ _dst_pte = pte_mkuffd_wp(_dst_pte);
+ else if (writable)
+ _dst_pte = pte_mkwrite(_dst_pte);
dst_pte = pte_offset_map_lock(dst_mm, dst_pmd, dst_addr, &ptl);
The patch titled Subject: userfaultfd: mark uffd_wp regardless of VM_WRITE flag has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is userfaultfd-mark-uffd_wp-regardless-of-vm_write-flag.patch This patch should soon appear at https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/userfaultfd-mark-uffd_wp-regardless-of-vm_write-flag.patch and later at https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/userfaultfd-mark-uffd_wp-regardless-of-vm_write-flag.patch Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated there every 3-4 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Subject: userfaultfd: mark uffd_wp regardless of VM_WRITE flag When a PTE is set by UFFD operations such as UFFDIO_COPY, the PTE is currently only marked as write-protected if the VMA has VM_WRITE flag set. This seems incorrect or at least would be unexpected by the users. Consider the following sequence of operations that are being performed on a certain page: mprotect(PROT_READ) UFFDIO_COPY(UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP) mprotect(PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) At this point the user would expect to still get UFFD notification when the page is accessed for write, but the user would not get one, since the PTE was not marked as UFFD_WP during UFFDIO_COPY. Fix it by always marking PTEs as UFFD_WP regardless on the write-permission in the VMA flags. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220217211602.2769-1-namit@vmware.com Fixes: 292924b26024 ("userfaultfd: wp: apply _PAGE_UFFD_WP bit") Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> --- mm/userfaultfd.c | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)