| Message ID | 7640f9ac-88af-ace7-0bd4-990d852567dd@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [GIT,PULL] Immutable branch with 5.17-rc1 + "pinctrl: baytrail: Add pinconf,group + function for the pmu_clk" | expand |
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 5:48 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote: > Hello Intel pinctrl maintainers, > > As discussed here is a pull-req for an immutable branch with 5.17-rc1 + > "pinctrl: baytrail: Add pinconf,group + function for the pmu_clk". I suppose this is for Andy possibly I already pulled the pulled tree. Yours, Linus Walleij
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 3:01 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 5:48 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Hello Intel pinctrl maintainers, > > > > As discussed here is a pull-req for an immutable branch with 5.17-rc1 + > > "pinctrl: baytrail: Add pinconf,group + function for the pmu_clk". > > I suppose this is for Andy possibly I already pulled the pulled tree. Nope, but it appears not necessary. We have nothing to update in my tree which is dependent on this PR.
Hi, On 3/15/22 07:19, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 3:01 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 5:48 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello Intel pinctrl maintainers, >>> >>> As discussed here is a pull-req for an immutable branch with 5.17-rc1 + >>> "pinctrl: baytrail: Add pinconf,group + function for the pmu_clk". >> >> I suppose this is for Andy possibly I already pulled the pulled tree. > > Nope, but it appears not necessary. We have nothing to update in my > tree which is dependent on this PR. Ok, note this is already in the platform-drivers-x86 tree, since this was a dep for another patch there. So I guess the single patch in the PR will find its way upstream through the pdx86 tree then (which is fine). Regards, Hans
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:18 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote: > On 3/15/22 07:19, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 3:01 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 5:48 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> As discussed here is a pull-req for an immutable branch with 5.17-rc1 + > >>> "pinctrl: baytrail: Add pinconf,group + function for the pmu_clk". > >> > >> I suppose this is for Andy possibly I already pulled the pulled tree. > > > > Nope, but it appears not necessary. We have nothing to update in my > > tree which is dependent on this PR. > > Ok, note this is already in the platform-drivers-x86 tree, since this > was a dep for another patch there. So I guess the single patch in the PR > will find its way upstream through the pdx86 tree then (which is fine). That is my expectation as well.
Hello Intel pinctrl maintainers, As discussed here is a pull-req for an immutable branch with 5.17-rc1 + "pinctrl: baytrail: Add pinconf,group + function for the pmu_clk". I'll merge this into my review-hans branch with the dependend patches merged on top and I'll push the whole set to for-next once the buildbots have had a chance to test things. Regards, Hans The following changes since commit e783362eb54cd99b2cac8b3a9aeac942e6f6ac07: Linux 5.17-rc1 (2022-01-23 10:12:53 +0200) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git tags/platform-drivers-x86-pinctrl-pmu_clk-1 for you to fetch changes up to 2f46d7f7e959da3ae18ed5d283935673f7a22354: pinctrl: baytrail: Add pinconf group + function for the pmu_clk (2022-02-24 16:44:34 +0100) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Immutable branch with 5.17-rc1 + "pinctrl: baytrail: Add pinconf group + function for the pmu_clk" For merging into both pdx86/for-next and pinctrl/intel/for-next. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Hans de Goede (1): pinctrl: baytrail: Add pinconf group + function for the pmu_clk drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)