arm64: dts: qcom: Drop bogus interrupt flags cell on MDSS nodes

The MDSS interrupt provider is a single cell, so specifying interrupt flags
on the consumers is incorrect.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Hi Rob,

On 2022-03-01 15:05:31, Rob Herring wrote:
> The MDSS interrupt provider is a single cell, so specifying interrupt flags
> on the consumers is incorrect.

There seem to be many more violators of `#interrupt-cells = <1>;`, at
least on -next e6ada6df471f.  It seems those are not intentionally
omitted in this patch?  Searching for `interrupt-parent = <&mdss>;`
globally and evaluating `interrupts =` right next to it yields:

- Two more hits in both sdm845.dtsi and sm8250.dtsi;
- qcom-msm8974.dtsi;
- msm8996.dtsi;
- sdm630.dtsi;
- sdm660.dtsi.

And for the docs patch:
- mdp5.txt;
- And the recently added dpu-qcm2290.yaml, whose CI failure might have
  exactly lead to this patch?

Would you mind cleaning these up in a v2, or otherwise explain and
forgive my ignorance for not seeing why these were not changed?

Thanks!

- Marijn

> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 2 +-
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> index 41f4e46e1f85..a6bf04780667 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> @@ -4281,7 +4281,7 @@ mdss_mdp: mdp@ae01000 {
>  				power-domains = <&rpmhpd SDM845_CX>;
>  
>  				interrupt-parent = <&mdss>;
> -				interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +				interrupts = <0>;
>  
>  				ports {
>  					#address-cells = <1>;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi
> index fdaf303ba047..e732e3370c75 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8250.dtsi
> @@ -3200,7 +3200,7 @@ mdss_mdp: mdp@ae01000 {
>  				power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8250_MMCX>;
>  
>  				interrupt-parent = <&mdss>;
> -				interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +				interrupts = <0>;
>  
>  				ports {
>  					#address-cells = <1>;
> -- 
> 2.32.0
>

On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 4:24 PM Marijn Suijten
<marijn.suijten@somainline.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 2022-03-01 15:05:31, Rob Herring wrote:
> > The MDSS interrupt provider is a single cell, so specifying interrupt flags
> > on the consumers is incorrect.
>
> There seem to be many more violators of `#interrupt-cells = <1>;`, at
> least on -next e6ada6df471f.  It seems those are not intentionally
> omitted in this patch?  Searching for `interrupt-parent = <&mdss>;`
> globally and evaluating `interrupts =` right next to it yields:
>
> - Two more hits in both sdm845.dtsi and sm8250.dtsi;
> - qcom-msm8974.dtsi;
> - msm8996.dtsi;
> - sdm630.dtsi;
> - sdm660.dtsi.
>
> And for the docs patch:
> - mdp5.txt;

Don't care, it's a .txt file.

> - And the recently added dpu-qcm2290.yaml, whose CI failure might have
>   exactly lead to this patch?
>
> Would you mind cleaning these up in a v2, or otherwise explain and
> forgive my ignorance for not seeing why these were not changed?

For the rest, just inadequate searching on my part. v2 coming soon.

Rob