drivers: Fix Links to Technologic Systems web resources

Technologic Systems has rebranded as embeddedTS with the current
domain eventually going offline. Update web/doc URLs to correct
resource locations.

Signed-off-by: Kris Bahnsen <kris@embeddedTS.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-ts5500.c       | 4 ++--
 drivers/net/can/sja1000/Kconfig  | 2 +-
 drivers/net/can/sja1000/tscan1.c | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

On 03.03.2022 14:55:25, Kris Bahnsen wrote:
> Technologic Systems has rebranded as embeddedTS with the current
> domain eventually going offline. Update web/doc URLs to correct
> resource locations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kris Bahnsen <kris@embeddedTS.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/can/sja1000/Kconfig  | 2 +-
>  drivers/net/can/sja1000/tscan1.c | 4 ++--

For the CAN part:

Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde

regards,
Marc

On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 11:57 PM Kris Bahnsen <kris@embeddedts.com> wrote:
>
> Technologic Systems has rebranded as embeddedTS with the current
> domain eventually going offline. Update web/doc URLs to correct
> resource locations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kris Bahnsen <kris@embeddedTS.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-ts5500.c       | 4 ++--
>  drivers/net/can/sja1000/Kconfig  | 2 +-
>  drivers/net/can/sja1000/tscan1.c | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-ts5500.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-ts5500.c
> index b159e92a3612..8e03614c7a24 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-ts5500.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-ts5500.c
> @@ -11,11 +11,11 @@
>   * Actually, the following platforms have DIO support:
>   *
>   * TS-5500:
> - *   Documentation: http://wiki.embeddedarm.com/wiki/TS-5500
> + *   Documentation: https://docs.embeddedts.com/TS-5500
>   *   Blocks: DIO1, DIO2 and LCD port.
>   *
>   * TS-5600:
> - *   Documentation: http://wiki.embeddedarm.com/wiki/TS-5600
> + *   Documentation: https://docs.embeddedts.com/TS-5600
>   *   Blocks: LCD port (identical to TS-5500 LCD).
>   */

For GPIO

Acked-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>

>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/Kconfig b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/Kconfig
> index 110071b26921..4b2f9cb17fc3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/Kconfig
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ config CAN_TSCAN1
>         depends on ISA
>         help
>           This driver is for Technologic Systems' TSCAN-1 PC104 boards.
> -         http://www.embeddedarm.com/products/board-detail.php?product=TS-CAN1
> +         https://www.embeddedts.com/products/TS-CAN1
>           The driver supports multiple boards and automatically configures them:
>           PLD IO base addresses are read from jumpers JP1 and JP2,
>           IRQ numbers are read from jumpers JP4 and JP5,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/tscan1.c b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/tscan1.c
> index 3dbba8d61afb..749002f21e27 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/tscan1.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/tscan1.c
> @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@
>
>  /*
>   * References:
> - * - Getting started with TS-CAN1, Technologic Systems, Jun 2009
> - *     http://www.embeddedarm.com/documentation/ts-can1-manual.pdf
> + * - Getting started with TS-CAN1, Technologic Systems, Feb 2022
> + *     https://docs.embeddedts.com/TS-CAN1
>   */
>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
> --
> 2.11.0
>

On 28.03.2022 10:49:20, Kris Bahnsen wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-03-04 at 08:24 +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > 
> > For the CAN part:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde
> > 
> > regards,
> > Marc
> 
> On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 10:22 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > 
> > For GPIO
> > 
> > Acked-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
> > 
> 
> 
> Inquiring about the status of this patch. I have not seen it show up in
> any repositories. Is there any other action I need to take at this time?
> Apologies if this time frame is normal for such a low priority patch, I
> am not sure what to expect. Thanks!

I'm taking the CAN part. I think it's best to repost the GPIO part as a
separate patch.

regards,
Marc

On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 15:18 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 7:58 PM Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > 
> > I'm taking the CAN part. I think it's best to repost the GPIO part as a
> > separate patch.
> > 
> 
> Yes please, and for the future: if possible separate such changes into
> patches aimed at different maintainers.
> 
> Bart
> 

Understood. Thank you for the information.

Kris