diff mbox series

[2/3] watchdog: da9063: optionally disable watchdog during suspend

Message ID 20220422072713.3172345-2-primoz.fiser@norik.com
State New
Headers show
Series None | expand

Commit Message

Primoz Fiser April 22, 2022, 7:27 a.m. UTC
Optionally disable watchdog during suspend (if enabled) and re-enable
it upon resume.
This enables boards to sleep without being interrupted by the watchdog.

This patch is based on commit f6c98b08381c ("watchdog: da9062: add
power management ops") and commit 8541673d2a5f ("watchdog: da9062: fix
power management ops") and brings the same functionality to DA9063.

Signed-off-by: Primoz Fiser <primoz.fiser@norik.com>
---
 drivers/watchdog/da9063_wdt.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)

Comments

Adam Thomson May 9, 2022, 10:38 a.m. UTC | #1
On 22 April 2022 08:27, Primoz Fiser wrote:

> Optionally disable watchdog during suspend (if enabled) and re-enable
> it upon resume.
> This enables boards to sleep without being interrupted by the watchdog.
>
> This patch is based on commit f6c98b08381c ("watchdog: da9062: add
> power management ops") and commit 8541673d2a5f ("watchdog: da9062: fix
> power management ops") and brings the same functionality to DA9063.

There's a WATCHDOG_PD bit (set to 0) to achieve this I believe, and thus
removes the need for the suspend/resume PM functions. Is this something you've
tried? Also seems to be present for DA9061/2 as well so can't remember why that
wasn't used there.
Primoz Fiser May 11, 2022, 8:47 a.m. UTC | #2
On 9. 05. 22 12:38, DLG Adam Thomson wrote:
> On 22 April 2022 08:27, Primoz Fiser wrote:
> 
>> Optionally disable watchdog during suspend (if enabled) and re-enable
>> it upon resume.
>> This enables boards to sleep without being interrupted by the watchdog.
>>
>> This patch is based on commit f6c98b08381c ("watchdog: da9062: add
>> power management ops") and commit 8541673d2a5f ("watchdog: da9062: fix
>> power management ops") and brings the same functionality to DA9063.
> 
> There's a WATCHDOG_PD bit (set to 0) to achieve this I believe, and thus
> removes the need for the suspend/resume PM functions. Is this something you've
> tried? Also seems to be present for DA9061/2 as well so can't remember why that
> wasn't used there.

Ideally one should be able to use WATCHDOG_PD bit indeed.

However there are boards out there which don't have the ability to use 
the PMIC's powerdown/active mode due to PCB design and thus PMIC is left 
enabled during suspend i.e. cannot use the POWERDOWN mode.

Check mailing list correspondence [1] which already gave explanation why 
there was a need to implement such quirks for da9062 and the need to 
handle this in software instead of hardware.

Links:

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20191128171931.22563-1-m.felsch@pengutronix.de/
Adam Thomson May 11, 2022, 9:03 a.m. UTC | #3
On 11 May 2022 09:48, Primoz Fiser wrote:

> >> Optionally disable watchdog during suspend (if enabled) and re-enable
> >> it upon resume.
> >> This enables boards to sleep without being interrupted by the watchdog.
> >>
> >> This patch is based on commit f6c98b08381c ("watchdog: da9062: add
> >> power management ops") and commit 8541673d2a5f ("watchdog: da9062: fix
> >> power management ops") and brings the same functionality to DA9063.
> >
> > There's a WATCHDOG_PD bit (set to 0) to achieve this I believe, and thus
> > removes the need for the suspend/resume PM functions. Is this something
> you've
> > tried? Also seems to be present for DA9061/2 as well so can't remember why
> that
> > wasn't used there.
>
> Ideally one should be able to use WATCHDOG_PD bit indeed.
>
> However there are boards out there which don't have the ability to use
> the PMIC's powerdown/active mode due to PCB design and thus PMIC is left
> enabled during suspend i.e. cannot use the POWERDOWN mode.
>
> Check mailing list correspondence [1] which already gave explanation why
> there was a need to implement such quirks for da9062 and the need to
> handle this in software instead of hardware.
>
> Links:
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20191128171931.22563-1-m.felsch@pengutronix.de/

At least I'm consistent in my first response :)

Yes I remember the discussion now. Thanks for the reminder. In which case:

Reviewed-by: Adam Thomson <DLG-Adam.Thomson.Opensource@dm.renesas.com>
Guenter Roeck May 14, 2022, 1:56 p.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 09:27:12AM +0200, Primoz Fiser wrote:
> Optionally disable watchdog during suspend (if enabled) and re-enable
> it upon resume.
> This enables boards to sleep without being interrupted by the watchdog.
> 
> This patch is based on commit f6c98b08381c ("watchdog: da9062: add
> power management ops") and commit 8541673d2a5f ("watchdog: da9062: fix
> power management ops") and brings the same functionality to DA9063.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Primoz Fiser <primoz.fiser@norik.com>
> Reviewed-by: Adam Thomson <DLG-Adam.Thomson.Opensource@dm.renesas.com>

Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

> ---
>  drivers/watchdog/da9063_wdt.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/da9063_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/da9063_wdt.c
> index 9adad1862bbd..09a4af4c58fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/da9063_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/da9063_wdt.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/mfd/da9063/registers.h>
>  #include <linux/mfd/da9063/core.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
>  
>  /*
> @@ -26,6 +27,8 @@
>   *   others: timeout = 2048 ms * 2^(TWDSCALE-1).
>   */
>  static const unsigned int wdt_timeout[] = { 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 65, 131 };
> +static bool use_sw_pm;
> +
>  #define DA9063_TWDSCALE_DISABLE		0
>  #define DA9063_TWDSCALE_MIN		1
>  #define DA9063_TWDSCALE_MAX		(ARRAY_SIZE(wdt_timeout) - 1)
> @@ -218,6 +221,8 @@ static int da9063_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (!wdd)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	use_sw_pm = device_property_present(dev, "dlg,use-sw-pm");
> +
>  	wdd->info = &da9063_watchdog_info;
>  	wdd->ops = &da9063_watchdog_ops;
>  	wdd->min_timeout = DA9063_WDT_MIN_TIMEOUT;
> @@ -228,6 +233,7 @@ static int da9063_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	watchdog_set_restart_priority(wdd, 128);
>  	watchdog_set_drvdata(wdd, da9063);
> +	dev_set_drvdata(dev, wdd);
>  
>  	wdd->timeout = DA9063_WDG_TIMEOUT;
>  
> @@ -249,10 +255,40 @@ static int da9063_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return devm_watchdog_register_device(dev, wdd);
>  }
>  
> +static int __maybe_unused da9063_wdt_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct watchdog_device *wdd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	if (!use_sw_pm)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (watchdog_active(wdd))
> +		return da9063_wdt_stop(wdd);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __maybe_unused da9063_wdt_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct watchdog_device *wdd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	if (!use_sw_pm)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (watchdog_active(wdd))
> +		return da9063_wdt_start(wdd);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(da9063_wdt_pm_ops,
> +			da9063_wdt_suspend, da9063_wdt_resume);
> +
>  static struct platform_driver da9063_wdt_driver = {
>  	.probe = da9063_wdt_probe,
>  	.driver = {
>  		.name = DA9063_DRVNAME_WATCHDOG,
> +		.pm = &da9063_wdt_pm_ops,
>  	},
>  };
>  module_platform_driver(da9063_wdt_driver);
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/da9063_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/da9063_wdt.c
index 9adad1862bbd..09a4af4c58fc 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/da9063_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/da9063_wdt.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/da9063/registers.h>
 #include <linux/mfd/da9063/core.h>
+#include <linux/property.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
 
 /*
@@ -26,6 +27,8 @@ 
  *   others: timeout = 2048 ms * 2^(TWDSCALE-1).
  */
 static const unsigned int wdt_timeout[] = { 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 65, 131 };
+static bool use_sw_pm;
+
 #define DA9063_TWDSCALE_DISABLE		0
 #define DA9063_TWDSCALE_MIN		1
 #define DA9063_TWDSCALE_MAX		(ARRAY_SIZE(wdt_timeout) - 1)
@@ -218,6 +221,8 @@  static int da9063_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!wdd)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	use_sw_pm = device_property_present(dev, "dlg,use-sw-pm");
+
 	wdd->info = &da9063_watchdog_info;
 	wdd->ops = &da9063_watchdog_ops;
 	wdd->min_timeout = DA9063_WDT_MIN_TIMEOUT;
@@ -228,6 +233,7 @@  static int da9063_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	watchdog_set_restart_priority(wdd, 128);
 	watchdog_set_drvdata(wdd, da9063);
+	dev_set_drvdata(dev, wdd);
 
 	wdd->timeout = DA9063_WDG_TIMEOUT;
 
@@ -249,10 +255,40 @@  static int da9063_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return devm_watchdog_register_device(dev, wdd);
 }
 
+static int __maybe_unused da9063_wdt_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct watchdog_device *wdd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	if (!use_sw_pm)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (watchdog_active(wdd))
+		return da9063_wdt_stop(wdd);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __maybe_unused da9063_wdt_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct watchdog_device *wdd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	if (!use_sw_pm)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (watchdog_active(wdd))
+		return da9063_wdt_start(wdd);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(da9063_wdt_pm_ops,
+			da9063_wdt_suspend, da9063_wdt_resume);
+
 static struct platform_driver da9063_wdt_driver = {
 	.probe = da9063_wdt_probe,
 	.driver = {
 		.name = DA9063_DRVNAME_WATCHDOG,
+		.pm = &da9063_wdt_pm_ops,
 	},
 };
 module_platform_driver(da9063_wdt_driver);