@@ -780,11 +780,9 @@ int __acpi_node_get_property_reference(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
if (ret)
return ret == -EINVAL ? -ENOENT : -EINVAL;
- /*
- * The simplest case is when the value is a single reference. Just
- * return that reference then.
- */
- if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE) {
+ switch (obj->type) {
+ case ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE:
+ /* Plain single reference without arguments. */
if (index)
return -ENOENT;
@@ -795,19 +793,21 @@ int __acpi_node_get_property_reference(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
args->fwnode = acpi_fwnode_handle(device);
args->nargs = 0;
return 0;
+ case ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE:
+ /*
+ * If it is not a single reference, then it is a package of
+ * references followed by number of ints as follows:
+ *
+ * Package () { REF, INT, REF, INT, INT }
+ *
+ * The index argument is then used to determine which reference
+ * the caller wants (along with the arguments).
+ */
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
}
- /*
- * If it is not a single reference, then it is a package of
- * references followed by number of ints as follows:
- *
- * Package () { REF, INT, REF, INT, INT }
- *
- * The index argument is then used to determine which reference
- * the caller wants (along with the arguments).
- */
- if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE)
- return -EINVAL;
if (index >= obj->package.count)
return -ENOENT;
@@ -815,7 +815,8 @@ int __acpi_node_get_property_reference(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
end = element + obj->package.count;
while (element < end) {
- if (element->type == ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE) {
+ switch (element->type) {
+ case ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE:
device = acpi_fetch_acpi_dev(element->reference.handle);
if (!device)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -831,11 +832,13 @@ int __acpi_node_get_property_reference(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
if (idx == index)
return 0;
- } else if (element->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
+ break;
+ case ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER:
if (idx == index)
return -ENOENT;
element++;
- } else {
+ break;
+ default:
return -EINVAL;
}
__acpi_node_get_property_reference() uses a series of if () statements for testing the same variable. There's soon going to be one more value to be tested. Switch to use switch() instead. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/acpi/property.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)