diff mbox series

[1/2] dt-bindings: bluetooth: broadcom: Add BCM4349B1 DT binding

Message ID 20220521200734.421223-1-a.fatoum@pengutronix.de
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [1/2] dt-bindings: bluetooth: broadcom: Add BCM4349B1 DT binding | expand

Commit Message

Ahmad Fatoum May 21, 2022, 8:07 p.m. UTC
The BCM4349B1 chip is a single-chip Bluetooth 5.0 controller and
Transceiver. It is contained in the CYW/BCM89359 WiFi+BT package.
Extend the binding with its DT compatible.

Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
---
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>
To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

bluez.test.bot@gmail.com May 21, 2022, 9:07 p.m. UTC | #1
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=644017

---Test result---

Test Summary:
CheckPatch                    FAIL      1.84 seconds
GitLint                       PASS      0.84 seconds
SubjectPrefix                 FAIL      0.30 seconds
BuildKernel                   PASS      40.18 seconds
BuildKernel32                 PASS      36.15 seconds
Incremental Build with patchesPASS      54.29 seconds
TestRunner: Setup             PASS      602.88 seconds
TestRunner: l2cap-tester      PASS      19.98 seconds
TestRunner: bnep-tester       PASS      7.16 seconds
TestRunner: mgmt-tester       PASS      122.74 seconds
TestRunner: rfcomm-tester     PASS      11.33 seconds
TestRunner: sco-tester        PASS      11.17 seconds
TestRunner: smp-tester        PASS      11.03 seconds
TestRunner: userchan-tester   PASS      7.79 seconds

Details
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - FAIL - 1.84 seconds
Run checkpatch.pl script with rule in .checkpatch.conf
[1/2] dt-bindings: bluetooth: broadcom: Add BCM4349B1 DT binding\WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: Duplicate signature
#87: 
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 7 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

/github/workspace/src/12858005.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: Ignored message types: UNKNOWN_COMMIT_ID

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

[2/2] Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Add BCM4349B1 variant\WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: Duplicate signature
#91: 
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 15 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
      mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

/github/workspace/src/12858004.patch has style problems, please review.

NOTE: Ignored message types: UNKNOWN_COMMIT_ID

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.


##############################
Test: SubjectPrefix - FAIL - 0.30 seconds
Check subject contains "Bluetooth" prefix
"Bluetooth: " is not specified in the subject



---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
Krzysztof Kozlowski May 22, 2022, 7:40 a.m. UTC | #2
On 21/05/2022 22:07, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> The BCM4349B1 chip is a single-chip Bluetooth 5.0 controller and
> Transceiver. It is contained in the CYW/BCM89359 WiFi+BT package.
> Extend the binding with its DT compatible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>


Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>


Best regards,
Krzysztof
Linus Walleij May 22, 2022, 9:03 p.m. UTC | #3
On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 10:07 PM Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> wrote:

> The BCM4349B1 chip is a single-chip Bluetooth 5.0 controller and
> Transceiver. It is contained in the CYW/BCM89359 WiFi+BT package.

So the BT and the package have two different names.

> +      - brcm,bcm4349-bt

Then why do you have to tag on "-bt" on this compatible?

That is typically used when the wifi and bt has the *same* name, so
the only way to distinguish between them is a suffix.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Ahmad Fatoum May 22, 2022, 10:16 p.m. UTC | #4
On 22.05.22 23:03, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 10:07 PM Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> 
>> The BCM4349B1 chip is a single-chip Bluetooth 5.0 controller and
>> Transceiver. It is contained in the CYW/BCM89359 WiFi+BT package.
> 
> So the BT and the package have two different names.

The package also goes by the name BCM4349B1 apparently.
Cypress support had later confirmed BCM4349B1 and BCM89359 to
be the same chipset. I should probably rephrase the commit message.


>> +      - brcm,bcm4349-bt
> 
> Then why do you have to tag on "-bt" on this compatible?
> 
> That is typically used when the wifi and bt has the *same* name, so
> the only way to distinguish between them is a suffix.
I think that's the case here too.

Cheers,
Ahmad

> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
Linus Walleij May 23, 2022, 8:38 a.m. UTC | #5
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 12:16 AM Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> On 22.05.22 23:03, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 10:07 PM Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> >> The BCM4349B1 chip is a single-chip Bluetooth 5.0 controller and
> >> Transceiver. It is contained in the CYW/BCM89359 WiFi+BT package.
> >
> > So the BT and the package have two different names.
>
> The package also goes by the name BCM4349B1 apparently.
> Cypress support had later confirmed BCM4349B1 and BCM89359 to
> be the same chipset. I should probably rephrase the commit message.
>
>
> >> +      - brcm,bcm4349-bt
> >
> > Then why do you have to tag on "-bt" on this compatible?
> >
> > That is typically used when the wifi and bt has the *same* name, so
> > the only way to distinguish between them is a suffix.

> I think that's the case here too.

OK then!
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.yaml
index 5aac094fd217..58ecafc1b7f9 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.yaml
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@  properties:
       - brcm,bcm4345c5
       - brcm,bcm43540-bt
       - brcm,bcm4335a0
+      - brcm,bcm4349-bt
 
   shutdown-gpios:
     maxItems: 1