Message ID | 20220609133541.3984886-8-amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | ASoC: codecs: Series of fixes for realtek codecs used on RVPs | expand |
On 6/9/2022 4:18 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 03:35:37PM +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote: >> Interrupt is only needed when jack detection is enabled, so enable it >> then, similarly disable it when jack detection is being disabled. > >> if (jack == NULL) { >> /* Disable jack detection */ >> + disable_irq(rt274->i2c->irq); > > There is absolutely no need to do this, it'll interfere with any sharing > of the interrupt and if the interrupt isn't firing then there is no cost > to having the interrupt registered. > > The driver could use some cleanup of the interrupt handler, it currently > unconditionally clears anything that fires and reports IRQ_HANDLED but > should only report IRQ_HANDLED if there was anything from the device. > Practically speaking it shouldn't make much difference unless there's > spurious interrupts or the interrupt gets shared. I will recheck this again, but if I remember correctly we may have had problems that codec kept firing interrupts when we unloaded machine board and codec driver kept spamming dmesg due to _dbg message present in irq handler.
On 6/9/2022 4:18 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 03:35:37PM +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote: >> Interrupt is only needed when jack detection is enabled, so enable it >> then, similarly disable it when jack detection is being disabled. > >> if (jack == NULL) { >> /* Disable jack detection */ >> + disable_irq(rt274->i2c->irq); > > There is absolutely no need to do this, it'll interfere with any sharing > of the interrupt and if the interrupt isn't firing then there is no cost > to having the interrupt registered. > > The driver could use some cleanup of the interrupt handler, it currently > unconditionally clears anything that fires and reports IRQ_HANDLED but > should only report IRQ_HANDLED if there was anything from the device. > Practically speaking it shouldn't make much difference unless there's > spurious interrupts or the interrupt gets shared. While this sounds fine, in tests I see that irq handler gets called around ~800 times per second even when we unload platform driver and there is no one caring about jack detection... in this case I would consider this to be a waste of CPU time and would prefer to just outright to disable it. Is there some better way to avoid unnecessary calls to irq handler? Main reason why I even looked at this is pr_debug() present in rt298_jack_detect() which kept spamming our debug logs (~800 lines per second fills up logs rather fast...). It should probably be removed, as rt286 and rt274 do fine without having this logged, but they also call irq handler quite a lot if you add message log for debug.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 03:53:09PM +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote: > On 6/9/2022 4:18 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 03:35:37PM +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote: > > The driver could use some cleanup of the interrupt handler, it currently > > unconditionally clears anything that fires and reports IRQ_HANDLED but > > should only report IRQ_HANDLED if there was anything from the device. > > Practically speaking it shouldn't make much difference unless there's > > spurious interrupts or the interrupt gets shared. > While this sounds fine, in tests I see that irq handler gets called around > ~800 times per second even when we unload platform driver and there is no > one caring about jack detection... in this case I would consider this to be > a waste of CPU time and would prefer to just outright to disable it. Is > there some better way to avoid unnecessary calls to irq handler? > Main reason why I even looked at this is pr_debug() present in > rt298_jack_detect() which kept spamming our debug logs (~800 lines per > second fills up logs rather fast...). It should probably be removed, as > rt286 and rt274 do fine without having this logged, but they also call irq > handler quite a lot if you add message log for debug. If the jack detection is firing hundreds of times a second without there being an event that seems like a serious problem with the way the hardware is set up which should be fixed, I'm surprised that this isn't disrupting things normally.
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/rt274.c b/sound/soc/codecs/rt274.c index 144a6f775c21..730de9452333 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/rt274.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/rt274.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include <linux/spi/spi.h> #include <linux/dmi.h> #include <linux/acpi.h> +#include <linux/irq.h> #include <sound/core.h> #include <sound/pcm.h> #include <sound/pcm_params.h> @@ -395,28 +396,42 @@ static void rt274_jack_detect_work(struct work_struct *work) SND_JACK_MICROPHONE | SND_JACK_HEADPHONE); } -static irqreturn_t rt274_irq(int irq, void *data); - static int rt274_mic_detect(struct snd_soc_component *component, struct snd_soc_jack *jack, void *data) { struct rt274_priv *rt274 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component); + bool mic = false; + bool hp = false; + int status = 0; + int ret; rt274->jack = jack; if (jack == NULL) { /* Disable jack detection */ + disable_irq(rt274->i2c->irq); regmap_update_bits(rt274->regmap, RT274_EAPD_GPIO_IRQ_CTRL, RT274_IRQ_EN, RT274_IRQ_DIS); return 0; } + /* Enable jack detection */ regmap_update_bits(rt274->regmap, RT274_EAPD_GPIO_IRQ_CTRL, RT274_IRQ_EN, RT274_IRQ_EN); + enable_irq(rt274->i2c->irq); /* Send an initial report */ - rt274_irq(0, rt274); + ret = rt274_jack_detect(rt274, &hp, &mic); + if (!ret) { + if (hp) + status |= SND_JACK_HEADPHONE; + + if (mic) + status |= SND_JACK_MICROPHONE; + + snd_soc_jack_report(rt274->jack, status, SND_JACK_MICROPHONE | SND_JACK_HEADPHONE); + } return 0; } @@ -984,6 +999,9 @@ static int rt274_probe(struct snd_soc_component *component) INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&rt274->jack_detect_work, rt274_jack_detect_work); if (rt274->i2c->irq) { + /* irq will be enabled in rt274_mic_detect */ + irq_set_status_flags(rt274->i2c->irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN); + ret = request_threaded_irq(rt274->i2c->irq, NULL, rt274_irq, IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_ONESHOT, "rt274", rt274); if (ret) {