| Message ID | 20220610090704.296-1-kalpana.shetty@amd.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [V2] selftests/vm: Add protection_keys tests to run_vmtests | expand |
On 6/10/22 3:07 AM, Kalpana Shetty wrote: > Adding "protected_keys" tests to "run_vmtests.sh" would help out to run all VM related tests > from a single shell script. > Makes sense - can you explain why you can't just run protection_keys_32 without checks? Why are you checking for VADDR64? All of this information helps us review the patch and give you feedback and suggest a different approach. > Signed-off-by: Kalpana Shetty <kalpana.shetty@amd.com> > --- > Changes in V2: > * Added patch description. > thanks, -- Shuah
On 6/14/2022 3:14 AM, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 6/10/22 3:07 AM, Kalpana Shetty wrote: >> Adding "protected_keys" tests to "run_vmtests.sh" would help out to >> run all VM related tests >> from a single shell script. >> > > Makes sense - can you explain why you can't just run > protection_keys_32 without checks? Yes; we can run protection_keys_32 without check. > Why are you checking for VADDR64? The check is added to ensure if the system is in 64-bit mode before executing 64-bit binary. > All of this information helps us review the > patch and give you feedback and suggest a different approach. Thanks, Kalpana > >> Signed-off-by: Kalpana Shetty <kalpana.shetty@amd.com> >> --- >> Changes in V2: >> * Added patch description. >> > > thanks, > -- Shuah
On 6/14/22 6:15 AM, Shetty, Kalpana wrote: > > On 6/14/2022 3:14 AM, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 6/10/22 3:07 AM, Kalpana Shetty wrote: >>> Adding "protected_keys" tests to "run_vmtests.sh" would help out to run all VM related tests >>> from a single shell script. >>> >> >> Makes sense - can you explain why you can't just run >> protection_keys_32 without checks? > > Yes; we can run protection_keys_32 without check. > > >> Why are you checking for VADDR64? > > The check is added to ensure if the system is in 64-bit mode before executing 64-bit binary. > > Okay. protection_keys_32 will only be built on 32-bit system and. protection_keys_64 on 64-bit system. Won't it be better to check if binary exists and run either _32 or _64 instead of checking for VADDR64? thanks, -- Shuah
On 6/15/22 6:04 AM, Shetty, Kalpana wrote: > > On 6/14/2022 10:50 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 6/14/22 6:15 AM, Shetty, Kalpana wrote: >>> >>> On 6/14/2022 3:14 AM, Shuah Khan wrote: >>>> On 6/10/22 3:07 AM, Kalpana Shetty wrote: >>>>> Adding "protected_keys" tests to "run_vmtests.sh" would help out to run all VM related tests >>>>> from a single shell script. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Makes sense - can you explain why you can't just run >>>> protection_keys_32 without checks? >>> >>> Yes; we can run protection_keys_32 without check. >>> >>> >>>> Why are you checking for VADDR64? >>> >>> The check is added to ensure if the system is in 64-bit mode before executing 64-bit binary. >>> >>> >> >> Okay. protection_keys_32 will only be built on 32-bit system and. >> protection_keys_64 on 64-bit system. > > On 64-bit system, we get both 32-bit and 64-bit binary. > > >> >> Won't it be better to check if binary exists and run either _32 or >> _64 instead of checking for VADDR64? > > makes sense; > > In this case on 64-bit platform we would run both _32 and _64 and this should be fine. > > Okay - send v3 with the change. thanks, -- Shuah
On 6/17/2022 1:23 AM, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 6/15/22 6:04 AM, Shetty, Kalpana wrote: >> >> On 6/14/2022 10:50 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: >>> On 6/14/22 6:15 AM, Shetty, Kalpana wrote: >>>> >>>> On 6/14/2022 3:14 AM, Shuah Khan wrote: >>>>> On 6/10/22 3:07 AM, Kalpana Shetty wrote: >>>>>> Adding "protected_keys" tests to "run_vmtests.sh" would help out >>>>>> to run all VM related tests >>>>>> from a single shell script. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Makes sense - can you explain why you can't just run >>>>> protection_keys_32 without checks? >>>> >>>> Yes; we can run protection_keys_32 without check. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Why are you checking for VADDR64? >>>> >>>> The check is added to ensure if the system is in 64-bit mode before >>>> executing 64-bit binary. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Okay. protection_keys_32 will only be built on 32-bit system and. >>> protection_keys_64 on 64-bit system. >> >> On 64-bit system, we get both 32-bit and 64-bit binary. >> >> >>> >>> Won't it be better to check if binary exists and run either _32 or >>> _64 instead of checking for VADDR64? >> >> makes sense; >> >> In this case on 64-bit platform we would run both _32 and _64 and >> this should be fine. >> >> > > Okay - send v3 with the change. Done; thanks for your input/review comments. > > thanks, > -- Shuah Thanks, Kalpana
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh index 41fce8bea929..54a0c28f810c 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh @@ -179,4 +179,11 @@ run_test ./ksm_tests -N -m 1 # KSM test with 2 NUMA nodes and merge_across_nodes = 0 run_test ./ksm_tests -N -m 0 +# protection_keys tests +if [ $VADDR64 -eq 0 ]; then + run_test ./protection_keys_32 +else + run_test ./protection_keys_64 +fi + exit $exitcode
Adding "protected_keys" tests to "run_vmtests.sh" would help out to run all VM related tests from a single shell script. Signed-off-by: Kalpana Shetty <kalpana.shetty@amd.com> --- Changes in V2: * Added patch description. tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests.sh | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)