Message ID | 1450794972-27141-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 1f33b0131a15f4dc6b2fff9d3ef9d002070bda40 |
Headers | show |
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/simpad.c b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/simpad.c index 41e476e571d7..d8965c682d2f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/simpad.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sa1100/simpad.c @@ -98,8 +98,8 @@ static void cs3_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value) static int cs3_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) { if (offset > 15) - return simpad_get_cs3_ro() & (1 << (offset - 16)); - return simpad_get_cs3_shadow() & (1 << offset); + return !!(simpad_get_cs3_ro() & (1 << (offset - 16))); + return !!(simpad_get_cs3_shadow() & (1 << offset)); }; static int cs3_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1]. We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern. Cc: arm@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> --- ARM SoC folks: as mentioned in 00/54: either apply this directly or ACK it and I will take it into the GPIO tree. --- arch/arm/mach-sa1100/simpad.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.4.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html