| Message ID | 20220805135729.1037079-4-marijn.suijten@somainline.org |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add Qcom PM6125 PMIC, and use in Sony Xperia Seine PDX201 | expand |
On 05/08/2022 16:57, Marijn Suijten wrote: > This PMIC is commonly used on boards with an SM6125 SoC and looks very > similar in layout to the PM6150. > > Downstream declares more nodes to be available, but these have been > omitted from this patch: the pwm/lpg block is unused on my reference > device making it impossible to test/validate, and the spmi-clkdiv does > not have a single device-tree binding using this driver yet, hence > inclusion is better postponed until ie. audio which uses these clocks is > brought up. > Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve. > + > + xo-therm@4c { > + reg = <ADC5_XO_THERM_100K_PU>; > + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>; > + qcom,hw-settle-time = <200>; > + qcom,ratiometric; > + }; > + }; > + > + pm6125_adc_tm: adc-tm@3500 { Generic node names, so either this is adc or thermal-sensor. Looks like thermal-sensor. > + compatible = "qcom,spmi-adc-tm5"; > + reg = <0x3500>; > + interrupts = <0x0 0x35 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > + pm6125_rtc: rtc@6000 { > + compatible = "qcom,pm8941-rtc"; > + reg = <0x6000>, <0x6100>; > + reg-names = "rtc", "alarm"; > + interrupts = <0x0 0x61 0x1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; > + status = "disabled"; > + }; > + > + pm6125_gpio: gpios@c000 { s/gpios/gpio/ > + compatible = "qcom,pm6125-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio"; > + reg = <0xc000>; > + gpio-controller; > + gpio-ranges = <&pm6125_gpio 0 0 9>; > + #gpio-cells = <2>; > + interrupt-controller; > + #interrupt-cells = <2>; > + }; > + }; > + > + pmic@1 { > + compatible = "qcom,pm6125", "qcom,spmi-pmic"; > + reg = <0x1 SPMI_USID>; > + }; > +}; Best regards, Krzysztof
On 2022-08-08 12:17:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 05/08/2022 16:57, Marijn Suijten wrote: > > This PMIC is commonly used on boards with an SM6125 SoC and looks very > > similar in layout to the PM6150. > > > > Downstream declares more nodes to be available, but these have been > > omitted from this patch: the pwm/lpg block is unused on my reference > > device making it impossible to test/validate, and the spmi-clkdiv does > > not have a single device-tree binding using this driver yet, hence > > inclusion is better postponed until ie. audio which uses these clocks is > > brought up. > > > > Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve. I can respin the series with the suggested changes (and the iio patch removed as that has now been applied), but note that all other PMIC dtsi files as of -next today still carry the "wrong" adc-tm or gpios node names. Are there plans to patch those up too (if not already in a series that I missed)? - Marijn > > + > > + xo-therm@4c { > > + reg = <ADC5_XO_THERM_100K_PU>; > > + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>; > > + qcom,hw-settle-time = <200>; > > + qcom,ratiometric; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > + pm6125_adc_tm: adc-tm@3500 { > > Generic node names, so either this is adc or thermal-sensor. Looks like > thermal-sensor. > > > + compatible = "qcom,spmi-adc-tm5"; > > + reg = <0x3500>; > > + interrupts = <0x0 0x35 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + pm6125_rtc: rtc@6000 { > > + compatible = "qcom,pm8941-rtc"; > > + reg = <0x6000>, <0x6100>; > > + reg-names = "rtc", "alarm"; > > + interrupts = <0x0 0x61 0x1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + pm6125_gpio: gpios@c000 { > > s/gpios/gpio/ > > > + compatible = "qcom,pm6125-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio"; > > + reg = <0xc000>; > > + gpio-controller; > > + gpio-ranges = <&pm6125_gpio 0 0 9>; > > + #gpio-cells = <2>; > > + interrupt-controller; > > + #interrupt-cells = <2>; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > + pmic@1 { > > + compatible = "qcom,pm6125", "qcom,spmi-pmic"; > > + reg = <0x1 SPMI_USID>; > > + }; > > +}; > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
On 07/09/2022 23:27, Marijn Suijten wrote: > On 2022-08-08 12:17:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 05/08/2022 16:57, Marijn Suijten wrote: >>> This PMIC is commonly used on boards with an SM6125 SoC and looks very >>> similar in layout to the PM6150. >>> >>> Downstream declares more nodes to be available, but these have been >>> omitted from this patch: the pwm/lpg block is unused on my reference >>> device making it impossible to test/validate, and the spmi-clkdiv does >>> not have a single device-tree binding using this driver yet, hence >>> inclusion is better postponed until ie. audio which uses these clocks is >>> brought up. >>> >> >> Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve. > > I can respin the series with the suggested changes (and the iio patch > removed as that has now been applied), but note that all other PMIC dtsi > files as of -next today still carry the "wrong" adc-tm or gpios node > names. Are there plans to patch those up too (if not already in a > series that I missed)? See below > > - Marijn > >>> + >>> + xo-therm@4c { >>> + reg = <ADC5_XO_THERM_100K_PU>; >>> + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>; >>> + qcom,hw-settle-time = <200>; >>> + qcom,ratiometric; >>> + }; >>> + }; >>> + >>> + pm6125_adc_tm: adc-tm@3500 { >> >> Generic node names, so either this is adc or thermal-sensor. Looks like >> thermal-sensor. My comment was here not correct. The schema indeed expects this to be adc-tm. I did not plan to change it, so let's keep adc-tm also here. >> >>> + compatible = "qcom,spmi-adc-tm5"; >>> + reg = <0x3500>; >>> + interrupts = <0x0 0x35 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; >>> + #address-cells = <1>; >>> + #size-cells = <0>; >>> + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>; >>> + status = "disabled"; >>> + }; >>> + >>> + pm6125_rtc: rtc@6000 { >>> + compatible = "qcom,pm8941-rtc"; >>> + reg = <0x6000>, <0x6100>; >>> + reg-names = "rtc", "alarm"; >>> + interrupts = <0x0 0x61 0x1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; >>> + status = "disabled"; >>> + }; >>> + >>> + pm6125_gpio: gpios@c000 { >> >> s/gpios/gpio/ Both are allowed by schema, but convention in all other cases is "gpio", so let's change it. I'll send a patch for other files. Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm6125.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm6125.dtsi new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..25ef15fbfda7 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm6125.dtsi @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause + +#include <dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-vadc.h> +#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h> +#include <dt-bindings/input/linux-event-codes.h> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> +#include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h> + +/ { + thermal-zones { + pm6125-thermal { + polling-delay-passive = <100>; + polling-delay = <0>; + + thermal-sensors = <&pm6125_temp>; + + trips { + trip0 { + temperature = <95000>; + hysteresis = <0>; + type = "passive"; + }; + + trip1 { + temperature = <115000>; + hysteresis = <0>; + type = "hot"; + }; + + trip2 { + temperature = <145000>; + hysteresis = <0>; + type = "critical"; + }; + }; + }; + }; +}; + +&spmi_bus { + pmic@0 { + compatible = "qcom,pm6125", "qcom,spmi-pmic"; + reg = <0x0 SPMI_USID>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + pm6125_pon: pon@800 { + compatible = "qcom,pm8998-pon"; + reg = <0x800>; + mode-bootloader = <0x2>; + mode-recovery = <0x1>; + + pon_pwrkey: pwrkey { + compatible = "qcom,pm8941-pwrkey"; + interrupts = <0x0 0x8 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>; + debounce = <15625>; + linux,code = <KEY_POWER>; + bias-pull-up; + status = "disabled"; + }; + + pon_resin: resin { + compatible = "qcom,pm8941-resin"; + interrupts = <0x0 0x8 0x1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>; + debounce = <15625>; + bias-pull-up; + status = "disabled"; + }; + }; + + pm6125_temp: temp-alarm@2400 { + compatible = "qcom,spmi-temp-alarm"; + reg = <0x2400>; + interrupts = <0x0 0x24 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + io-channels = <&pm6125_adc ADC5_DIE_TEMP>; + io-channel-names = "thermal"; + #thermal-sensor-cells = <0>; + }; + + pm6125_adc: adc@3100 { + compatible = "qcom,spmi-adc5"; + reg = <0x3100>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + interrupts = <0x0 0x31 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + #io-channel-cells = <1>; + + ref-gnd@0 { + reg = <ADC5_REF_GND>; + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>; + }; + + vref-1p25@1 { + reg = <ADC5_1P25VREF>; + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>; + }; + + die-temp@6 { + reg = <ADC5_DIE_TEMP>; + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>; + }; + + vph-pwr@83 { + reg = <ADC5_VPH_PWR>; + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 3>; + }; + + vcoin@85 { + reg = <ADC5_VCOIN>; + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 3>; + }; + + xo-therm@4c { + reg = <ADC5_XO_THERM_100K_PU>; + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>; + qcom,hw-settle-time = <200>; + qcom,ratiometric; + }; + }; + + pm6125_adc_tm: adc-tm@3500 { + compatible = "qcom,spmi-adc-tm5"; + reg = <0x3500>; + interrupts = <0x0 0x35 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>; + status = "disabled"; + }; + + pm6125_rtc: rtc@6000 { + compatible = "qcom,pm8941-rtc"; + reg = <0x6000>, <0x6100>; + reg-names = "rtc", "alarm"; + interrupts = <0x0 0x61 0x1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; + status = "disabled"; + }; + + pm6125_gpio: gpios@c000 { + compatible = "qcom,pm6125-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio"; + reg = <0xc000>; + gpio-controller; + gpio-ranges = <&pm6125_gpio 0 0 9>; + #gpio-cells = <2>; + interrupt-controller; + #interrupt-cells = <2>; + }; + }; + + pmic@1 { + compatible = "qcom,pm6125", "qcom,spmi-pmic"; + reg = <0x1 SPMI_USID>; + }; +};