Message ID | 20220916153156.30412-1-ariel.dalessandro@collabora.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | ARM: dts: Add Raspberry Pi Compute Module 4 CANOPi Board | expand |
Hi Ariel, Am 16.09.22 um 17:31 schrieb Ariel D'Alessandro: > The Eclipse KUKSA CANOPi [0] is a baseboard for the Raspberry Compute > Module 4 (CM4). It contains a VIA VL805 4 Port USB controller and two > MCP251xFD based CAN-FD interfaces. this is a cool piece of hardware :-) Is it correct this baseboard is only intended for Compute Modules without Wifi/BT? Otherwise we get conflicts with UART0. The bcm2711-rpi-cm4.dtsi is currently written for all Compute Module variants. A possible solution is to use delete-node, another cleaner ones is to split bcm2711-rpi-cm4 into wifi and non-wifi variants and include the non-wifi one in your case. > > [0] https://github.com/boschresearch/kuksa.hardware > > Signed-off-by: Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessandro@collabora.com> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts | 139 ++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile | 1 + > .../dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts | 2 + > 4 files changed, 143 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile > index 05d8aef6e5d2..8930ab2c132c 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile > @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835) += \ > bcm2837-rpi-zero-2-w.dtb \ > bcm2711-rpi-400.dtb \ > bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dtb \ > + bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dtb \ > bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io.dtb \ > bcm2835-rpi-zero.dtb \ > bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dtb > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..52ec5908883c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts > @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/dts-v1/; > +#include "bcm2711-rpi-cm4.dtsi" > + > +/ { > + model = "Raspberry Pi Compute Module 4 CANOPi Board"; > + > + clocks { > + clk_mcp251xfd_osc: mcp251xfd-osc { > + #clock-cells = <0>; > + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > + clock-frequency = <20000000>; > + }; > + }; > + > + leds { > + led-act { > + gpios = <&gpio 42 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > + }; > + > + led-pwr { > + label = "PWR"; > + gpios = <&expgpio 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > + default-state = "keep"; > + linux,default-trigger = "default-on"; > + }; > + }; are these LEDs really populated and wired to the BCM2711? The schematics suggests that they are connected to the STN2120. > +}; > + > +&ddc0 { > + status = "okay"; > +}; > + > +&ddc1 { > + status = "okay"; > +}; > + > +&hdmi0 { > + status = "okay"; > +}; > + > +&hdmi1 { > + status = "okay"; > +}; I cannot see any graphical interface in the schematics. So why they are enabled? > + > +&i2c0 { > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&i2c0_gpio44>; > + status = "okay"; > + clock-frequency = <100000>; > + > + pcf85063a@51 { Please use the actual function for the node name like rtc@51 > + compatible = "nxp,pcf85063a"; > + reg = <0x51>; > + }; > +}; > + > +&pcie0 { > + pci@0,0 { > + device_type = "pci"; > + #address-cells = <3>; > + #size-cells = <2>; > + ranges; > + > + reg = <0 0 0 0 0>; > + > + usb@0,0 { > + reg = <0 0 0 0 0>; > + resets = <&reset RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE_RESET_ID_USB>; > + }; > + }; > +}; > + > +&pixelvalve0 { > + status = "okay"; > +}; > + > +&pixelvalve1 { > + status = "okay"; > +}; > + > +&pixelvalve2 { > + status = "okay"; > +}; > + > +&pixelvalve4 { > + status = "okay"; > +}; Without a graphical interface they shouldn't be necessary? > + > +&spi { > + status = "okay"; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&spi0_gpio7>; > + cs-gpios = <&gpio 8 1>, <&gpio 7 1>; > + dmas = <&dma 6>, <&dma 7>; > + dma-names = "tx", "rx"; > + > + mcp251xfd0: mcp251xfd@0 { mcp251xfd0: can@0 > + compatible = "microchip,mcp251xfd"; > + reg = <0>; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&mcp251xfd0_pins>; > + spi-max-frequency = <20000000>; I wasn't good at physics, but having spi-max-frequency equal to the oscillator frequency seems wrong. Is it because of the hack in the downstream kernel which halves the SPI frequency? Just guessing because imx6qp-prtwd3.dts uses 10 MHz. > + interrupt-parent = <&gpio>; > + interrupts = <27 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; > + clocks = <&clk_mcp251xfd_osc>; > + }; > + > + mcp251xfd1: mcp251xfd@1 { mcp251xfd1: can@1 > + compatible = "microchip,mcp251xfd"; > + reg = <1>; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&mcp251xfd1_pins>; > + spi-max-frequency = <20000000>; > + interrupt-parent = <&gpio>; > + interrupts = <22 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; > + clocks = <&clk_mcp251xfd_osc>; > + }; > +}; > + > +&gpio { In case there are any GPIOs which should be controlled via user space (like LTE or FAN control), it would be nice to describe them via gpio-line-names. > + mcp251xfd0_pins: mcp251xfd0_pins { > + brcm,pins = <27>; > + brcm,function = <BCM2835_FSEL_GPIO_IN>; > + }; The vendor specific pin properties are deprecated for BCM2711. We have generic ones for this: mcp251xfd0_pins: mcp251xfd0_pins { pin-irq { pins = "gpio27"; function = "gpio_in"; }; }; > + > + mcp251xfd1_pins: mcp251xfd1_pins { > + brcm,pins = <22>; > + brcm,function = <BCM2835_FSEL_GPIO_IN>; > + }; dito > +}; > + > +&vc4 { > + status = "okay"; > +}; I think this is also not necessary for a headless device. > + > +&vec { > + status = "disabled"; > +}; > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile > index e8584d3b698f..7cd88b8c0345 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835) += bcm2711-rpi-400.dtb \ > bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dtb \ > + bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dtb \ > bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io.dtb \ > bcm2837-rpi-3-a-plus.dtb \ > bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dtb \ > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..e9369aa0eb39 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +#include "arm/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts"
Hi Alexander, Am 20.09.22 um 10:31 schrieb Alexander Dahl: > Hello Stefan, > > Am Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 01:18:21PM +0200 schrieb Stefan Wahren: >> Hi Alexander, >> >> [fix address of Krzysztof] >> >> Am 19.09.22 um 09:47 schrieb Alexander Dahl: >>> Hei hei, >>> >>> Am Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 12:31:56PM -0300 schrieb Ariel D'Alessandro: >>>> The Eclipse KUKSA CANOPi [0] is a baseboard for the Raspberry Compute >>>> Module 4 (CM4). It contains a VIA VL805 4 Port USB controller and two >>>> MCP251xFD based CAN-FD interfaces. >>>> >>>> [0] https://github.com/boschresearch/kuksa.hardware >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessandro@collabora.com> >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 + >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts | 139 ++++++++++++++++++ >>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile | 1 + >>>> .../dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts | 2 + >>>> 4 files changed, 143 insertions(+) >>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts >>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile >>>> index 05d8aef6e5d2..8930ab2c132c 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile >>>> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835) += \ >>>> bcm2837-rpi-zero-2-w.dtb \ >>>> bcm2711-rpi-400.dtb \ >>>> bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dtb \ >>>> + bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dtb \ >>>> bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io.dtb \ >>>> bcm2835-rpi-zero.dtb \ >>>> bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dtb >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 000000000000..52ec5908883c >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ >>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >>>> +/dts-v1/; >>>> +#include "bcm2711-rpi-cm4.dtsi" >>>> + >>>> +/ { >>>> + model = "Raspberry Pi Compute Module 4 CANOPi Board"; >>>> + >>>> + clocks { >>>> + clk_mcp251xfd_osc: mcp251xfd-osc { >>>> + #clock-cells = <0>; >>>> + compatible = "fixed-clock"; >>>> + clock-frequency = <20000000>; >>>> + }; >>>> + }; >>>> + >>>> + leds { >>>> + led-act { >>>> + gpios = <&gpio 42 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; >>>> + }; >>>> + >>>> + led-pwr { >>>> + label = "PWR"; >>>> + gpios = <&expgpio 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; >>>> + default-state = "keep"; >>>> + linux,default-trigger = "default-on"; >>>> + }; >>>> + }; >>> This looks like using the node name and the deprecated "label" >>> property for LED naming. Please see >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.yaml and use the >>> properties "function" and "color" instead. Also check the node names >>> itself, see the example in that binding or the leds-gpio binding for >>> reference. >> Oops, i didn't noticed this. >> >> Unfortunately the ACT-LED is already a little bit opaque defined in >> bcm2835-rpi.dtsi: >> >> leds { >> compatible = "gpio-leds"; >> >> led-act { >> label = "ACT"; >> default-state = "keep"; >> linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat"; >> }; >> }; >> >> So a reference (currently missing) would have make it clear that the ACT-LED >> is common for all Raspberry Pi boards. > Yes, a reference would probably good, would make it easier to spot > this is already defined in the dtsi. I will take care of this. > >> So you wish that this is fixed for the CANOPi board or all Raspberry Pi >> boards? >> >> I'm asking because switching to function would change the sysfs path and >> breaking userspace ABI. > You're right, and the effective label should stay as is for existing > boards to not break userspace. > > Not sure what the policy is for baseboards with compute modules. Are > those LEDs on the compute module? Or does the CM just expose those > GPIOs? These are GPIOs expose by the Compute Module. Since these are initialized by the VC4 firmware, it's not the best idea to use them for other functions. > Is there some policy all baseboards must use them for LEDs? > An what about additional LEDs on the baseboard? Is this allowed? Definitely > (I don't think there a generic rules for that, but maybe some best > practices for certain SoMs like the RPi CM?) I think we should for Ariel's reponse. > IMHO for new independent boards though, new LEDs should not be > introduced the old way. I thought this is the case here, but it seems > I was wrong due to that baseboard vs. SoM thing. Without your comment i hadn't noticed this :-) I'm thinking of a dtsi file in order to encapsulate the deprecated LED stuff, remove the global ACT-LED from bcm2835-rpi.dtsi and include the dtsi from all board files. Best regards
Hi! > > + led-pwr { > > + label = "PWR"; > > + gpios = <&expgpio 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > > + default-state = "keep"; > > + linux,default-trigger = "default-on"; > > + }; NAK on the label, see/modify well-known-leds.txt.
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile index 05d8aef6e5d2..8930ab2c132c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835) += \ bcm2837-rpi-zero-2-w.dtb \ bcm2711-rpi-400.dtb \ bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dtb \ + bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dtb \ bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io.dtb \ bcm2835-rpi-zero.dtb \ bcm2835-rpi-zero-w.dtb diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..52ec5908883c --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/dts-v1/; +#include "bcm2711-rpi-cm4.dtsi" + +/ { + model = "Raspberry Pi Compute Module 4 CANOPi Board"; + + clocks { + clk_mcp251xfd_osc: mcp251xfd-osc { + #clock-cells = <0>; + compatible = "fixed-clock"; + clock-frequency = <20000000>; + }; + }; + + leds { + led-act { + gpios = <&gpio 42 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + }; + + led-pwr { + label = "PWR"; + gpios = <&expgpio 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; + default-state = "keep"; + linux,default-trigger = "default-on"; + }; + }; +}; + +&ddc0 { + status = "okay"; +}; + +&ddc1 { + status = "okay"; +}; + +&hdmi0 { + status = "okay"; +}; + +&hdmi1 { + status = "okay"; +}; + +&i2c0 { + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&i2c0_gpio44>; + status = "okay"; + clock-frequency = <100000>; + + pcf85063a@51 { + compatible = "nxp,pcf85063a"; + reg = <0x51>; + }; +}; + +&pcie0 { + pci@0,0 { + device_type = "pci"; + #address-cells = <3>; + #size-cells = <2>; + ranges; + + reg = <0 0 0 0 0>; + + usb@0,0 { + reg = <0 0 0 0 0>; + resets = <&reset RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE_RESET_ID_USB>; + }; + }; +}; + +&pixelvalve0 { + status = "okay"; +}; + +&pixelvalve1 { + status = "okay"; +}; + +&pixelvalve2 { + status = "okay"; +}; + +&pixelvalve4 { + status = "okay"; +}; + +&spi { + status = "okay"; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&spi0_gpio7>; + cs-gpios = <&gpio 8 1>, <&gpio 7 1>; + dmas = <&dma 6>, <&dma 7>; + dma-names = "tx", "rx"; + + mcp251xfd0: mcp251xfd@0 { + compatible = "microchip,mcp251xfd"; + reg = <0>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&mcp251xfd0_pins>; + spi-max-frequency = <20000000>; + interrupt-parent = <&gpio>; + interrupts = <27 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; + clocks = <&clk_mcp251xfd_osc>; + }; + + mcp251xfd1: mcp251xfd@1 { + compatible = "microchip,mcp251xfd"; + reg = <1>; + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&mcp251xfd1_pins>; + spi-max-frequency = <20000000>; + interrupt-parent = <&gpio>; + interrupts = <22 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; + clocks = <&clk_mcp251xfd_osc>; + }; +}; + +&gpio { + mcp251xfd0_pins: mcp251xfd0_pins { + brcm,pins = <27>; + brcm,function = <BCM2835_FSEL_GPIO_IN>; + }; + + mcp251xfd1_pins: mcp251xfd1_pins { + brcm,pins = <22>; + brcm,function = <BCM2835_FSEL_GPIO_IN>; + }; +}; + +&vc4 { + status = "okay"; +}; + +&vec { + status = "disabled"; +}; diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile index e8584d3b698f..7cd88b8c0345 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835) += bcm2711-rpi-400.dtb \ bcm2711-rpi-4-b.dtb \ + bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dtb \ bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io.dtb \ bcm2837-rpi-3-a-plus.dtb \ bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dtb \ diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..e9369aa0eb39 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +#include "arm/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts"
The Eclipse KUKSA CANOPi [0] is a baseboard for the Raspberry Compute Module 4 (CM4). It contains a VIA VL805 4 Port USB controller and two MCP251xFD based CAN-FD interfaces. [0] https://github.com/boschresearch/kuksa.hardware Signed-off-by: Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessandro@collabora.com> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 + arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts | 139 ++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile | 1 + .../dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts | 2 + 4 files changed, 143 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-canopi.dts