| Message ID | 20220918081119.295364-1-bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | dt-bindings: dma: Make minor fixes to qcom,bam-dma binding doc | expand |
On 9/18/22 2:19 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 18/09/2022 09:11, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: >> As a user recently noted, the qcom,bam-dma binding document >> describes the BAM DMA node incorrectly. > > It's a bit confusing - what is exactly incorrectly described by binding? > You did not make any changes to the binding itself... Sorry for the late reply. Your comment just skipped through my mail filters :( I understand your point. I should have made the commit message more descriptive (infact now I look at it, I see some key words are actually missing from the commit message). The commit message should infact read as: "As a user recently noted, the qcom,bam-dma binding document describes the BAM DMA node *in the example section* incorrectly. Fix the same by making it consistent with the node present inside 'qcom-msm8974' dts file, *namely the 'reg' and 'interrupt' values which are incorrect. While looking at the example in the binding document, the user noted that its incorrect when compared with both the 'msm8974' upstream as well as downstream dts files.* I hope the bold text (which I added above), helps clear the purpose of the patch better. Please let me know your views. Thanks, Bhupesh
On 25/09/2022 21:55, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > > On 9/18/22 2:19 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 18/09/2022 09:11, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: >>> As a user recently noted, the qcom,bam-dma binding document >>> describes the BAM DMA node incorrectly. >> >> It's a bit confusing - what is exactly incorrectly described by binding? >> You did not make any changes to the binding itself... > > Sorry for the late reply. Your comment just skipped through my mail > filters :( > > I understand your point. I should have made the commit message more > descriptive (infact now I look at it, I see some key words are actually > missing from the commit message). > > The commit message should infact read as: > > "As a user recently noted, the qcom,bam-dma binding document > describes the BAM DMA node *in the example section* incorrectly. Fix the OK, now it makes sense :) Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml index 9bf3a1b164f1..003098caf709 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ title: Qualcomm Technologies Inc BAM DMA controller maintainers: - Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org> - - Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> + - Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org> allOf: - $ref: "dma-controller.yaml#" @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ properties: - qcom,bam-v1.3.0 # MSM8974, APQ8074 and APQ8084 - qcom,bam-v1.4.0 - # MSM8916 + # MSM8916 and SDM845 - qcom,bam-v1.7.0 clocks: @@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ examples: dma-controller@f9944000 { compatible = "qcom,bam-v1.4.0"; - reg = <0xf9944000 0x15000>; - interrupts = <GIC_SPI 94 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + reg = <0xf9944000 0x19000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 239 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; clocks = <&gcc GCC_BLSP2_AHB_CLK>; clock-names = "bam_clk"; #dma-cells = <1>;
As a user recently noted, the qcom,bam-dma binding document describes the BAM DMA node incorrectly. Fix the same by making it consistent with the node present inside 'qcom-msm8974' dts file. While at it also make two minor cleanups: - mention Bjorn's new email ID in the document, and - add SDM845 in the comment line for the SoCs on which qcom,bam-v1.7.0 version is supported. Fixes: 4f46cc1b88b3 ("dt-bindings: dma: Convert Qualcomm BAM DMA binding to json format") Cc: konrad.dybcio@somainline.org Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org Cc: andersson@kernel.org Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)