diff mbox series

[v1,1/1] pinctrl: intel: Save and restore pins in "direct IRQ" mode

Message ID 20221124222926.72326-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
State Accepted
Commit 6989ea4881c8944fbf04378418bb1af63d875ef8
Headers show
Series [v1,1/1] pinctrl: intel: Save and restore pins in "direct IRQ" mode | expand

Commit Message

Andy Shevchenko Nov. 24, 2022, 10:29 p.m. UTC
The firmware on some systems may configure GPIO pins to be
an interrupt source in so called "direct IRQ" mode. In such
cases the GPIO controller driver has no idea if those pins
are being used or not. At the same time, there is a known bug
in the firmwares that don't restore the pin settings correctly
after suspend, i.e. by an unknown reason the Rx value becomes
inverted.

Hence, let's save and restore the pins that are configured
as GPIOs in the input mode with GPIROUTIOXAPIC bit set.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-and-tested-by: Dale Smith <dalepsmith@gmail.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: John Harris <jmharris@gmail.com>
BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214749
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---

Linus, I hope that this can still make v6.1 release. I'm not going to
send a PR for this change unless you insist.

 drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Mika Westerberg Nov. 25, 2022, 6:11 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 12:29:26AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The firmware on some systems may configure GPIO pins to be
> an interrupt source in so called "direct IRQ" mode. In such
> cases the GPIO controller driver has no idea if those pins
> are being used or not. At the same time, there is a known bug
> in the firmwares that don't restore the pin settings correctly
> after suspend, i.e. by an unknown reason the Rx value becomes
> inverted.
> 
> Hence, let's save and restore the pins that are configured
> as GPIOs in the input mode with GPIROUTIOXAPIC bit set.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-and-tested-by: Dale Smith <dalepsmith@gmail.com>
> Reported-and-tested-by: John Harris <jmharris@gmail.com>
> BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214749
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

Thanks Andy!

Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Andy Shevchenko Nov. 28, 2022, 7:12 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 08:11:14AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 12:29:26AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The firmware on some systems may configure GPIO pins to be
> > an interrupt source in so called "direct IRQ" mode. In such
> > cases the GPIO controller driver has no idea if those pins
> > are being used or not. At the same time, there is a known bug
> > in the firmwares that don't restore the pin settings correctly
> > after suspend, i.e. by an unknown reason the Rx value becomes
> > inverted.
> > 
> > Hence, let's save and restore the pins that are configured
> > as GPIOs in the input mode with GPIROUTIOXAPIC bit set.
> > 
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Dale Smith <dalepsmith@gmail.com>
> > Reported-and-tested-by: John Harris <jmharris@gmail.com>
> > BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214749
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Thanks Andy!
> 
> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Thank you!

Linus, this would be nice to have in v6.1 release, if possible.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
index 739030e24093..57553ac77518 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
@@ -446,9 +446,14 @@  static void __intel_gpio_set_direction(void __iomem *padcfg0, bool input)
 	writel(value, padcfg0);
 }
 
+static int __intel_gpio_get_gpio_mode(u32 value)
+{
+	return (value & PADCFG0_PMODE_MASK) >> PADCFG0_PMODE_SHIFT;
+}
+
 static int intel_gpio_get_gpio_mode(void __iomem *padcfg0)
 {
-	return (readl(padcfg0) & PADCFG0_PMODE_MASK) >> PADCFG0_PMODE_SHIFT;
+	return __intel_gpio_get_gpio_mode(readl(padcfg0));
 }
 
 static void intel_gpio_set_gpio_mode(void __iomem *padcfg0)
@@ -1705,6 +1710,7 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_pinctrl_get_soc_data);
 static bool intel_pinctrl_should_save(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl, unsigned int pin)
 {
 	const struct pin_desc *pd = pin_desc_get(pctrl->pctldev, pin);
+	u32 value;
 
 	if (!pd || !intel_pad_usable(pctrl, pin))
 		return false;
@@ -1719,6 +1725,25 @@  static bool intel_pinctrl_should_save(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl, unsigned int
 	    gpiochip_line_is_irq(&pctrl->chip, intel_pin_to_gpio(pctrl, pin)))
 		return true;
 
+	/*
+	 * The firmware on some systems may configure GPIO pins to be
+	 * an interrupt source in so called "direct IRQ" mode. In such
+	 * cases the GPIO controller driver has no idea if those pins
+	 * are being used or not. At the same time, there is a known bug
+	 * in the firmwares that don't restore the pin settings correctly
+	 * after suspend, i.e. by an unknown reason the Rx value becomes
+	 * inverted.
+	 *
+	 * Hence, let's save and restore the pins that are configured
+	 * as GPIOs in the input mode with GPIROUTIOXAPIC bit set.
+	 *
+	 * See https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214749.
+	 */
+	value = readl(intel_get_padcfg(pctrl, pin, PADCFG0));
+	if ((value & PADCFG0_GPIROUTIOXAPIC) && (value & PADCFG0_GPIOTXDIS) &&
+	    (__intel_gpio_get_gpio_mode(value) == PADCFG0_PMODE_GPIO))
+		return true;
+
 	return false;
 }