| Message ID | 016401d90ac4$7b6848c0$7238da40$@samsung.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | ASoC: soc-compress: Reposition and add pcm_mutex | expand |
On Thu, 08 Dec 2022 14:18:18 +0900, 강신형 wrote: > If panic_on_warn is set and compress stream(DPCM) is started, > then kernel panic occurred because card->pcm_mutex isn't held appropriately. > In the following functions, warning were issued at this line > "snd_soc_dpcm_mutex_assert_held". > > static int dpcm_be_connect(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, > struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *be, int stream) > { > ... > snd_soc_dpcm_mutex_assert_held(fe); > ... > } > > [...] Applied to broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] ASoC: soc-compress: Reposition and add pcm_mutex commit: aa9ff6a4955fdba02b54fbc4386db876603703b7 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-compress.c b/sound/soc/soc-compress.c index 870f13e1d389..7bce5088b455 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-compress.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-compress.c @@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ static int soc_compr_open_fe(struct snd_compr_stream *cstream) if (ret < 0) goto be_err; + mutex_lock_nested(&fe->card->pcm_mutex, fe->card->pcm_subclass); + /* calculate valid and active FE <-> BE dpcms */ dpcm_process_paths(fe, stream, &list, 1);
If panic_on_warn is set and compress stream(DPCM) is started, then kernel panic occurred because card->pcm_mutex isn't held appropriately. In the following functions, warning were issued at this line "snd_soc_dpcm_mutex_assert_held". static int dpcm_be_connect(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *be, int stream) { ... snd_soc_dpcm_mutex_assert_held(fe); ... } void dpcm_be_disconnect(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream) { ... snd_soc_dpcm_mutex_assert_held(fe); ... } void snd_soc_runtime_action(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int stream, int action) { ... snd_soc_dpcm_mutex_assert_held(rtd); ... } int dpcm_dapm_stream_event(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int dir, int event) { ... snd_soc_dpcm_mutex_assert_held(fe); ... } These functions are called by soc_compr_set_params_fe, soc_compr_open_fe and soc_compr_free_fe without pcm_mutex locking. And this is call stack. [ 414.527841][ T2179] pc : dpcm_process_paths+0x5a4/0x750 [ 414.527848][ T2179] lr : dpcm_process_paths+0x37c/0x750 [ 414.527945][ T2179] Call trace: [ 414.527949][ T2179] dpcm_process_paths+0x5a4/0x750 [ 414.527955][ T2179] soc_compr_open_fe+0xb0/0x2cc [ 414.527972][ T2179] snd_compr_open+0x180/0x248 [ 414.527981][ T2179] snd_open+0x15c/0x194 [ 414.528003][ T2179] chrdev_open+0x1b0/0x220 [ 414.528023][ T2179] do_dentry_open+0x30c/0x594 [ 414.528045][ T2179] vfs_open+0x34/0x44 [ 414.528053][ T2179] path_openat+0x914/0xb08 [ 414.528062][ T2179] do_filp_open+0xc0/0x170 [ 414.528068][ T2179] do_sys_openat2+0x94/0x18c [ 414.528076][ T2179] __arm64_sys_openat+0x78/0xa4 [ 414.528084][ T2179] invoke_syscall+0x48/0x10c [ 414.528094][ T2179] el0_svc_common+0xbc/0x104 [ 414.528099][ T2179] do_el0_svc+0x34/0xd8 [ 414.528103][ T2179] el0_svc+0x34/0xc4 [ 414.528125][ T2179] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x8c/0xfc [ 414.528133][ T2179] el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 [ 414.528142][ T2179] Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ... So, I reposition and add pcm_mutex to resolve lockdep error. Signed-off-by: Shinhyung Kang <s47.kang@samsung.com> --- sound/soc/soc-compress.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) fe->dpcm[stream].runtime = fe_substream->runtime; @@ -184,7 +186,6 @@ static int soc_compr_open_fe(struct snd_compr_stream *cstream) fe->dpcm[stream].state = SND_SOC_DPCM_STATE_OPEN; fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO; - mutex_lock_nested(&fe->card->pcm_mutex, fe->card->pcm_subclass); snd_soc_runtime_activate(fe, stream); mutex_unlock(&fe->card->pcm_mutex); @@ -215,7 +216,6 @@ static int soc_compr_free_fe(struct snd_compr_stream *cstream) mutex_lock_nested(&fe->card->pcm_mutex, fe->card->pcm_subclass); snd_soc_runtime_deactivate(fe, stream); - mutex_unlock(&fe->card->pcm_mutex); fe->dpcm[stream].runtime_update = SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_FE; @@ -234,6 +234,8 @@ static int soc_compr_free_fe(struct snd_compr_stream *cstream) dpcm_be_disconnect(fe, stream); + mutex_unlock(&fe->card->pcm_mutex); + fe->dpcm[stream].runtime = NULL; snd_soc_link_compr_shutdown(cstream, 0); @@ -409,8 +411,9 @@ static int soc_compr_set_params_fe(struct snd_compr_stream *cstream, ret = snd_soc_link_compr_set_params(cstream); if (ret < 0) goto out; - + mutex_lock_nested(&fe->card->pcm_mutex, fe->card->pcm_subclass); dpcm_dapm_stream_event(fe, stream, SND_SOC_DAPM_STREAM_START); + mutex_unlock(&fe->card->pcm_mutex); fe->dpcm[stream].state = SND_SOC_DPCM_STATE_PREPARE; out: