| Message ID | 20221223233200.26089-4-quic_wcheng@quicinc.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Introduce QC USB SND audio offloading support | expand |
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 10:02:59AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 03:31:49PM -0800, Wesley Cheng wrote: > > + * struct q6usb_offload > > + * @dev - dev handle to usb be > "be"? What is that? Back end. This is a concept in DPCM which should be reasonably discoverable to people working on the audio portions of this code. > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +/* > > + * Copyright (c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved. > All of the code in this patch series is older than 2022 as I know it has > been in shipping devices for many years. Please use the proper > copyright year to make your lawyers happy... Are you *positive* about this. Based on some preparatory discussions the Qualcomm people had with Takashi and I it seemed like this was a new version of existing concepts. I'm sure they had something already but it's not obvious to me that they're just posting the same code. > > +static const struct snd_soc_dapm_route q6usb_dapm_routes[] = { > > + {"USB Playback", NULL, "USB_RX_BE"}, > > +}; > No terminating entry? How does this not break? Why do you need to > specify the size of the array, that feels like a design bug somewhere. It's how the interface works, the number of entries is passed in when adding routes.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 01:04:55PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 10:02:59AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 03:31:49PM -0800, Wesley Cheng wrote: > > > > + * struct q6usb_offload > > > + * @dev - dev handle to usb be > > > "be"? What is that? > > Back end. This is a concept in DPCM which should be reasonably > discoverable to people working on the audio portions of this code. Ok, then how is the reference counting logic handled here? USB devices can be removed from the system at any point in time... > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > > +/* > > > + * Copyright (c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved. > > > All of the code in this patch series is older than 2022 as I know it has > > been in shipping devices for many years. Please use the proper > > copyright year to make your lawyers happy... > > Are you *positive* about this. Based on some preparatory discussions > the Qualcomm people had with Takashi and I it seemed like this was a new > version of existing concepts. I'm sure they had something already but > it's not obvious to me that they're just posting the same code. I thought that this same code has been shipping in devices for a few years now in the last few Samsung phone models. Is this not the same code that is in those devices? If not, why not, what happened to that codebase that makes it not worthy of being submitted upstream? > > > +static const struct snd_soc_dapm_route q6usb_dapm_routes[] = { > > > + {"USB Playback", NULL, "USB_RX_BE"}, > > > +}; > > > No terminating entry? How does this not break? Why do you need to > > specify the size of the array, that feels like a design bug somewhere. > > It's how the interface works, the number of entries is passed in when > adding routes. Ah, you all might want to change that to make it simpler :) thanks, greg k-h
On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 14:45:13 +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 01:04:55PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 10:02:59AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 03:31:49PM -0800, Wesley Cheng wrote: > > > > > > + * struct q6usb_offload > > > > + * @dev - dev handle to usb be > > > > > "be"? What is that? > > > > Back end. This is a concept in DPCM which should be reasonably > > discoverable to people working on the audio portions of this code. > > Ok, then how is the reference counting logic handled here? USB devices > can be removed from the system at any point in time... The whole picture is fairly complex, and this patch is a part belonging to the ASoC machine driver -- that is, it's bound to the Qualcomm host, and there can be only one on a system. OTOH, USB audio devices are still managed by the existing USB audio driver as is, and they can be multiple and any devices. The basic idea here is a hijack of the USB data processing in USB audio driver with the offloading mechanism by this ASoC driver (only if the condition met). thanks, Takashi
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 03:02:31PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 01:04:55PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 10:02:59AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > > "be"? What is that? > > > Back end. This is a concept in DPCM which should be reasonably > > > discoverable to people working on the audio portions of this code. > > Ok, then how is the reference counting logic handled here? USB devices > > can be removed from the system at any point in time... > The whole picture is fairly complex, and this patch is a part > belonging to the ASoC machine driver -- that is, it's bound to the > Qualcomm host, and there can be only one on a system. > OTOH, USB audio devices are still managed by the existing USB audio > driver as is, and they can be multiple and any devices. The basic > idea here is a hijack of the USB data processing in USB audio driver > with the offloading mechanism by this ASoC driver (only if the > condition met). Right. I haven't even begun to look at the actual code here, just triaging my inbox, so I've got no thoughts on if things work or not.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 02:45:13PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 01:04:55PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 10:02:59AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > > > + * Copyright (c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved. > > > All of the code in this patch series is older than 2022 as I know it has > > > been in shipping devices for many years. Please use the proper > > > copyright year to make your lawyers happy... > > Are you *positive* about this. Based on some preparatory discussions > > the Qualcomm people had with Takashi and I it seemed like this was a new > > version of existing concepts. I'm sure they had something already but > > it's not obvious to me that they're just posting the same code. > I thought that this same code has been shipping in devices for a few > years now in the last few Samsung phone models. Is this not the same > code that is in those devices? > If not, why not, what happened to that codebase that makes it not worthy > of being submitted upstream? I don't specifically know anything about that code but I'd expect that for out of tree code breaking new ground like this there'd be a strong likelyhood that there'd be design level issues and that's what the pre submission discussions were all about - how to fit the concept into the kernel subsystems in a way that might be maintainable. There's also been the whole transition to their new DSP firmware going on. It's possible that what was shipped was implemented in the same way with the same code but I'd not assume that this is the case without actually comparing the two.
Hi Mark/Greg, On 12/27/2022 7:11 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 02:45:13PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 01:04:55PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 10:02:59AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > >>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved. > >>>> All of the code in this patch series is older than 2022 as I know it has >>>> been in shipping devices for many years. Please use the proper >>>> copyright year to make your lawyers happy... > >>> Are you *positive* about this. Based on some preparatory discussions >>> the Qualcomm people had with Takashi and I it seemed like this was a new >>> version of existing concepts. I'm sure they had something already but >>> it's not obvious to me that they're just posting the same code. > >> I thought that this same code has been shipping in devices for a few >> years now in the last few Samsung phone models. Is this not the same >> code that is in those devices? > >> If not, why not, what happened to that codebase that makes it not worthy >> of being submitted upstream? > > I don't specifically know anything about that code but I'd expect that > for out of tree code breaking new ground like this there'd be a strong > likelyhood that there'd be design level issues and that's what the pre > submission discussions were all about - how to fit the concept into the > kernel subsystems in a way that might be maintainable. There's also > been the whole transition to their new DSP firmware going on. It's > possible that what was shipped was implemented in the same way with the > same code but I'd not assume that this is the case without actually > comparing the two. It's correct that all the ASoC related patches are new, and didn't exist previously in QC products. It is due to the fact that Android has a different ALSA userspace concept which allowed for a lot of the Q6 audio front end (AFE) communication to be done from userspace, I believe. This is the reason that we had to introduce this new ASoC based design. I can't comment much more about the Android ALSA design, maybe @Patrick Lai can. Thanks Wesley Cheng
Hi Greg, On 12/24/2022 1:02 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 03:31:49PM -0800, Wesley Cheng wrote: >> Create a USB BE component that will register a new USB port to the ASoC USB >> framework. This will handle determination on if the requested audio >> profile is supported by the USB device currently selected. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com> >> --- >> include/sound/q6usboffload.h | 20 +++ >> sound/soc/qcom/Kconfig | 4 + >> sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/Makefile | 1 + >> sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6usb.c | 232 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 4 files changed, 257 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 include/sound/q6usboffload.h >> create mode 100644 sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6usb.c >> >> diff --git a/include/sound/q6usboffload.h b/include/sound/q6usboffload.h >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..e576808901d9 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/include/sound/q6usboffload.h >> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> + * >> + * linux/sound/q6usboffload.h -- QDSP6 USB offload >> + * >> + * Copyright (c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved. >> + */ >> + >> +/** >> + * struct q6usb_offload >> + * @dev - dev handle to usb be > > "be"? What is that? > >> + * @sid - streamID for iommu >> + * @intr_num - usb interrupter number >> + * @domain - allocated iommu domain >> + **/ >> +struct q6usb_offload { >> + struct device *dev; > > Do you properly reference count this? > >> + u32 sid; >> + u32 intr_num; >> + struct iommu_domain *domain; >> +}; > > What is the lifetime of this structure? Who owns it? Where is the lock > for accessing it? > Owner of this structure is the USB backend. If the USB backend is removed, then the qc_audio_offload driver would never receive the QMI request to enable the audio stream path from the audio dsp. (where this is referenced) It will exist as long as the USB BE device exists. One thing I will need to follow up on is if an ASoC backend device is removed while an audio playback is happening how it would handle it. >> diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/Kconfig b/sound/soc/qcom/Kconfig >> index 8c7398bc1ca8..d65c365116e5 100644 >> --- a/sound/soc/qcom/Kconfig >> +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/Kconfig >> @@ -111,6 +111,9 @@ config SND_SOC_QDSP6_APM >> config SND_SOC_QDSP6_PRM_LPASS_CLOCKS >> tristate >> >> +config SND_SOC_QDSP6_USB >> + tristate >> + >> config SND_SOC_QDSP6_PRM >> tristate >> select SND_SOC_QDSP6_PRM_LPASS_CLOCKS >> @@ -131,6 +134,7 @@ config SND_SOC_QDSP6 >> select SND_SOC_TOPOLOGY >> select SND_SOC_QDSP6_APM >> select SND_SOC_QDSP6_PRM >> + select SND_SOC_QDSP6_USB >> help >> To add support for MSM QDSP6 Soc Audio. >> This will enable sound soc platform specific >> diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/Makefile b/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/Makefile >> index 3963bf234664..c9457ee898d0 100644 >> --- a/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/Makefile >> +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/Makefile >> @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_QDSP6_APM_DAI) += q6apm-dai.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_QDSP6_APM_LPASS_DAI) += q6apm-lpass-dais.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_QDSP6_PRM) += q6prm.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_QDSP6_PRM_LPASS_CLOCKS) += q6prm-clocks.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_QDSP6_USB) += q6usb.o >> diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6usb.c b/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6usb.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..a9da6dec6c6f >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6usb.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,232 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >> +/* >> + * Copyright (c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved. > > All of the code in this patch series is older than 2022 as I know it has > been in shipping devices for many years. Please use the proper > copyright year to make your lawyers happy... > >> + */ >> + >> +#include <linux/err.h> >> +#include <linux/init.h> >> +#include <linux/module.h> >> +#include <linux/device.h> >> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> >> +#include <linux/slab.h> >> +#include <linux/iommu.h> >> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h> >> +#include <linux/dma-map-ops.h> >> + >> +#include <sound/pcm.h> >> +#include <sound/soc.h> >> +#include <sound/soc-usb.h> >> +#include <sound/pcm_params.h> >> +#include <sound/asound.h> >> +#include <sound/q6usboffload.h> >> + >> +#include "q6dsp-lpass-ports.h" >> +#include "q6afe.h" >> + >> +struct q6usb_port_data { >> + struct q6afe_usb_cfg usb_cfg; >> + struct snd_soc_usb *usb; >> + struct q6usb_offload priv; >> + int active_idx; >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct snd_soc_dapm_widget q6usb_dai_widgets[] = { >> + SND_SOC_DAPM_HP("USB_RX_BE", NULL), >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct snd_soc_dapm_route q6usb_dapm_routes[] = { >> + {"USB Playback", NULL, "USB_RX_BE"}, >> +}; > > No terminating entry? How does this not break? Why do you need to > specify the size of the array, that feels like a design bug somewhere. > > >> + >> +static int q6usb_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, >> + struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params, >> + struct snd_soc_dai *dai) >> +{ >> + return 0; >> +} >> +static const struct snd_soc_dai_ops q6usb_ops = { >> + .hw_params = q6usb_hw_params, >> +}; >> + >> +static struct snd_soc_dai_driver q6usb_be_dais[] = { >> + { >> + .playback = { >> + .stream_name = "USB BE RX", >> + .rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000 | SNDRV_PCM_RATE_11025 | >> + SNDRV_PCM_RATE_16000 | SNDRV_PCM_RATE_22050 | >> + SNDRV_PCM_RATE_32000 | SNDRV_PCM_RATE_44100 | >> + SNDRV_PCM_RATE_48000 | SNDRV_PCM_RATE_96000 | >> + SNDRV_PCM_RATE_192000, >> + .formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_BE | >> + SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U16_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U16_BE | >> + SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_BE | >> + SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U24_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U24_BE, >> + .channels_min = 1, >> + .channels_max = 2, >> + .rate_max = 192000, >> + .rate_min = 8000, >> + }, >> + .id = USB_RX, >> + .name = "USB_RX_BE", >> + .ops = &q6usb_ops, >> + }, >> +}; >> + >> +int q6usb_audio_ports_of_xlate_dai_name(struct snd_soc_component *component, >> + const struct of_phandle_args *args, >> + const char **dai_name) >> +{ >> + int id = args->args[0]; >> + int ret = -EINVAL; >> + int i; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(q6usb_be_dais); i++) { >> + if (q6usb_be_dais[i].id == id) { >> + *dai_name = q6usb_be_dais[i].name; >> + ret = 0; >> + break; >> + } >> + } >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static int q6usb_component_probe(struct snd_soc_component *component) >> +{ >> + struct q6usb_port_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(component->dev); >> + struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm = snd_soc_component_get_dapm(component); >> + >> + data->usb->component = component; >> + >> + snd_soc_dapm_disable_pin(dapm, "USB_RX_BE"); >> + snd_soc_dapm_sync(dapm); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static const struct snd_soc_component_driver q6usb_dai_component = { >> + .probe = q6usb_component_probe, >> + .name = "q6usb-dai-component", >> + .dapm_widgets = q6usb_dai_widgets, >> + .num_dapm_widgets = ARRAY_SIZE(q6usb_dai_widgets), >> + .dapm_routes = q6usb_dapm_routes, >> + .num_dapm_routes = ARRAY_SIZE(q6usb_dapm_routes), >> + .of_xlate_dai_name = q6usb_audio_ports_of_xlate_dai_name, >> +}; >> + >> +int q6usb_alsa_connection_cb(struct snd_soc_usb *usb, int card_idx, >> + int connected) >> +{ >> + struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm; >> + struct q6usb_port_data *data; >> + >> + if (!usb->component) >> + return 0; > > How can this happen? > > Why is this not an error? > If the ASoC platform card that this USB BE is a child of, is not yet registered then the component probe hasn't happened. However, that is independent of when the USB connect/disconnect events can happen. >> + >> + dapm = snd_soc_component_get_dapm(usb->component); >> + data = dev_get_drvdata(usb->component->dev); >> + >> + if (connected) { >> + snd_soc_dapm_enable_pin(dapm, "USB_RX_BE"); >> + /* We only track the latest USB headset plugged in */ >> + data->active_idx = card_idx; >> + } else { >> + snd_soc_dapm_disable_pin(dapm, "USB_RX_BE"); >> + } >> + snd_soc_dapm_sync(dapm); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int q6usb_dai_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node; >> + struct q6usb_port_data *data; >> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; >> + int ret; >> + >> + data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!data) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,usb-audio-stream-id", >> + &data->priv.sid); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to read sid.\n"); >> + return -ENODEV; >> + } >> + >> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,usb-audio-intr-num", >> + &data->priv.intr_num); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to read intr num.\n"); >> + return -ENODEV; >> + } >> + >> + data->priv.domain = iommu_domain_alloc(pdev->dev.bus); >> + if (!data->priv.domain) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to allocate iommu domain\n"); >> + return -ENODEV; >> + } >> + >> + /* attach to external processor iommu */ >> + ret = iommu_attach_device(data->priv.domain, &pdev->dev); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to attach device ret = %d\n", ret); >> + goto free_domain; >> + } >> + >> + data->usb = snd_soc_usb_add_port(dev, q6usb_alsa_connection_cb); >> + if (IS_ERR(data->usb)) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to add usb port\n"); >> + goto detach_device; >> + } >> + >> + data->priv.dev = dev; >> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, data); >> + devm_snd_soc_register_component(dev, &q6usb_dai_component, >> + q6usb_be_dais, ARRAY_SIZE(q6usb_be_dais)); > > Very odd indentation. Please do this properly everywhere. > > Got it...will fix everywhere >> + snd_soc_usb_set_priv_data(&data->priv); >> + >> + return 0; >> + >> +detach_device: >> + iommu_detach_device(data->priv.domain, &pdev->dev); >> +free_domain: >> + iommu_domain_free(data->priv.domain); >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static int q6usb_dai_dev_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + struct q6usb_port_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); >> + >> + iommu_detach_device(data->priv.domain, &pdev->dev); >> + iommu_domain_free(data->priv.domain); >> + >> + snd_soc_usb_remove_port(); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > > Is this really needed still? > Will remove this Thanks Wesley Cheng
> +int q6usb_alsa_connection_cb(struct snd_soc_usb *usb, int card_idx, > + int connected) > +{ > + struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm; > + struct q6usb_port_data *data; > + > + if (!usb->component) > + return 0; > + > + dapm = snd_soc_component_get_dapm(usb->component); > + data = dev_get_drvdata(usb->component->dev); > + > + if (connected) { > + snd_soc_dapm_enable_pin(dapm, "USB_RX_BE"); > + /* We only track the latest USB headset plugged in */ that answers to my earlier question on how to deal with multiple devices, but is this a desirable policy? This could lead to a lot of confusion. If there are restrictions to a single device, then it might be more interesting for userspace or the user to indicate which USB device gets to use USB offload and all others use legacy. > + data->active_idx = card_idx; > + } else { > + snd_soc_dapm_disable_pin(dapm, "USB_RX_BE"); > + } > + snd_soc_dapm_sync(dapm); > + > + return 0; > +}
On 1/5/23 19:05, Wesley Cheng wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > On 1/4/2023 3:41 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: >> >>> +int q6usb_alsa_connection_cb(struct snd_soc_usb *usb, int card_idx, >>> + int connected) >>> +{ >>> + struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm; >>> + struct q6usb_port_data *data; >>> + >>> + if (!usb->component) >>> + return 0; >>> + >>> + dapm = snd_soc_component_get_dapm(usb->component); >>> + data = dev_get_drvdata(usb->component->dev); >>> + >>> + if (connected) { >>> + snd_soc_dapm_enable_pin(dapm, "USB_RX_BE"); >>> + /* We only track the latest USB headset plugged in */ >> >> that answers to my earlier question on how to deal with multiple >> devices, but is this a desirable policy? This could lead to a lot of >> confusion. If there are restrictions to a single device, then it might >> be more interesting for userspace or the user to indicate which USB >> device gets to use USB offload and all others use legacy. >> > > Yeah, as mentioned its still pretty open ended. I think from the > feedback received from Mark/Takashi, this was a viable option for now. > Would you happen to have any insight/input on how the userspace can pass > down that selection to the ASoC framework? Maybe some kind of PCM IOCTL > call? I don't have a turn-key solution either :-) We'd need userspace to make one device as 'preferred' or 'optimized' and give it a priority somehow. It can't be a PCM IOCTL, it has to be at the device level. It's really a second-level optimization that can be parked for now, the bulk of the work is really the interaction between USB audio and ASoC stacks, we should probably focus on that BIG topic with a design that can be shared across implementations.
diff --git a/include/sound/q6usboffload.h b/include/sound/q6usboffload.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..e576808901d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/sound/q6usboffload.h @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + * + * linux/sound/q6usboffload.h -- QDSP6 USB offload + * + * Copyright (c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved. + */ + +/** + * struct q6usb_offload + * @dev - dev handle to usb be + * @sid - streamID for iommu + * @intr_num - usb interrupter number + * @domain - allocated iommu domain + **/ +struct q6usb_offload { + struct device *dev; + u32 sid; + u32 intr_num; + struct iommu_domain *domain; +}; diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/Kconfig b/sound/soc/qcom/Kconfig index 8c7398bc1ca8..d65c365116e5 100644 --- a/sound/soc/qcom/Kconfig +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/Kconfig @@ -111,6 +111,9 @@ config SND_SOC_QDSP6_APM config SND_SOC_QDSP6_PRM_LPASS_CLOCKS tristate +config SND_SOC_QDSP6_USB + tristate + config SND_SOC_QDSP6_PRM tristate select SND_SOC_QDSP6_PRM_LPASS_CLOCKS @@ -131,6 +134,7 @@ config SND_SOC_QDSP6 select SND_SOC_TOPOLOGY select SND_SOC_QDSP6_APM select SND_SOC_QDSP6_PRM + select SND_SOC_QDSP6_USB help To add support for MSM QDSP6 Soc Audio. This will enable sound soc platform specific diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/Makefile b/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/Makefile index 3963bf234664..c9457ee898d0 100644 --- a/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/Makefile +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/Makefile @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_QDSP6_APM_DAI) += q6apm-dai.o obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_QDSP6_APM_LPASS_DAI) += q6apm-lpass-dais.o obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_QDSP6_PRM) += q6prm.o obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_QDSP6_PRM_LPASS_CLOCKS) += q6prm-clocks.o +obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_QDSP6_USB) += q6usb.o diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6usb.c b/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6usb.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..a9da6dec6c6f --- /dev/null +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6usb.c @@ -0,0 +1,232 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright (c) 2022 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved. + */ + +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/iommu.h> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h> +#include <linux/dma-map-ops.h> + +#include <sound/pcm.h> +#include <sound/soc.h> +#include <sound/soc-usb.h> +#include <sound/pcm_params.h> +#include <sound/asound.h> +#include <sound/q6usboffload.h> + +#include "q6dsp-lpass-ports.h" +#include "q6afe.h" + +struct q6usb_port_data { + struct q6afe_usb_cfg usb_cfg; + struct snd_soc_usb *usb; + struct q6usb_offload priv; + int active_idx; +}; + +static const struct snd_soc_dapm_widget q6usb_dai_widgets[] = { + SND_SOC_DAPM_HP("USB_RX_BE", NULL), +}; + +static const struct snd_soc_dapm_route q6usb_dapm_routes[] = { + {"USB Playback", NULL, "USB_RX_BE"}, +}; + +static int q6usb_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, + struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params, + struct snd_soc_dai *dai) +{ + return 0; +} +static const struct snd_soc_dai_ops q6usb_ops = { + .hw_params = q6usb_hw_params, +}; + +static struct snd_soc_dai_driver q6usb_be_dais[] = { + { + .playback = { + .stream_name = "USB BE RX", + .rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000 | SNDRV_PCM_RATE_11025 | + SNDRV_PCM_RATE_16000 | SNDRV_PCM_RATE_22050 | + SNDRV_PCM_RATE_32000 | SNDRV_PCM_RATE_44100 | + SNDRV_PCM_RATE_48000 | SNDRV_PCM_RATE_96000 | + SNDRV_PCM_RATE_192000, + .formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_BE | + SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U16_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U16_BE | + SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_BE | + SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U24_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U24_BE, + .channels_min = 1, + .channels_max = 2, + .rate_max = 192000, + .rate_min = 8000, + }, + .id = USB_RX, + .name = "USB_RX_BE", + .ops = &q6usb_ops, + }, +}; + +int q6usb_audio_ports_of_xlate_dai_name(struct snd_soc_component *component, + const struct of_phandle_args *args, + const char **dai_name) +{ + int id = args->args[0]; + int ret = -EINVAL; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(q6usb_be_dais); i++) { + if (q6usb_be_dais[i].id == id) { + *dai_name = q6usb_be_dais[i].name; + ret = 0; + break; + } + } + + return ret; +} + +static int q6usb_component_probe(struct snd_soc_component *component) +{ + struct q6usb_port_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(component->dev); + struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm = snd_soc_component_get_dapm(component); + + data->usb->component = component; + + snd_soc_dapm_disable_pin(dapm, "USB_RX_BE"); + snd_soc_dapm_sync(dapm); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct snd_soc_component_driver q6usb_dai_component = { + .probe = q6usb_component_probe, + .name = "q6usb-dai-component", + .dapm_widgets = q6usb_dai_widgets, + .num_dapm_widgets = ARRAY_SIZE(q6usb_dai_widgets), + .dapm_routes = q6usb_dapm_routes, + .num_dapm_routes = ARRAY_SIZE(q6usb_dapm_routes), + .of_xlate_dai_name = q6usb_audio_ports_of_xlate_dai_name, +}; + +int q6usb_alsa_connection_cb(struct snd_soc_usb *usb, int card_idx, + int connected) +{ + struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm; + struct q6usb_port_data *data; + + if (!usb->component) + return 0; + + dapm = snd_soc_component_get_dapm(usb->component); + data = dev_get_drvdata(usb->component->dev); + + if (connected) { + snd_soc_dapm_enable_pin(dapm, "USB_RX_BE"); + /* We only track the latest USB headset plugged in */ + data->active_idx = card_idx; + } else { + snd_soc_dapm_disable_pin(dapm, "USB_RX_BE"); + } + snd_soc_dapm_sync(dapm); + + return 0; +} + +static int q6usb_dai_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node; + struct q6usb_port_data *data; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + int ret; + + data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!data) + return -ENOMEM; + + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,usb-audio-stream-id", + &data->priv.sid); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to read sid.\n"); + return -ENODEV; + } + + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,usb-audio-intr-num", + &data->priv.intr_num); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to read intr num.\n"); + return -ENODEV; + } + + data->priv.domain = iommu_domain_alloc(pdev->dev.bus); + if (!data->priv.domain) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to allocate iommu domain\n"); + return -ENODEV; + } + + /* attach to external processor iommu */ + ret = iommu_attach_device(data->priv.domain, &pdev->dev); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to attach device ret = %d\n", ret); + goto free_domain; + } + + data->usb = snd_soc_usb_add_port(dev, q6usb_alsa_connection_cb); + if (IS_ERR(data->usb)) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to add usb port\n"); + goto detach_device; + } + + data->priv.dev = dev; + dev_set_drvdata(dev, data); + devm_snd_soc_register_component(dev, &q6usb_dai_component, + q6usb_be_dais, ARRAY_SIZE(q6usb_be_dais)); + snd_soc_usb_set_priv_data(&data->priv); + + return 0; + +detach_device: + iommu_detach_device(data->priv.domain, &pdev->dev); +free_domain: + iommu_domain_free(data->priv.domain); + + return ret; +} + +static int q6usb_dai_dev_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct q6usb_port_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + + iommu_detach_device(data->priv.domain, &pdev->dev); + iommu_domain_free(data->priv.domain); + + snd_soc_usb_remove_port(); + + return 0; +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_OF +static const struct of_device_id q6usb_dai_device_id[] = { + { .compatible = "qcom,q6usb-dais" }, + {}, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, q6afe_dai_device_id); +#endif + +static struct platform_driver q6usb_dai_platform_driver = { + .driver = { + .name = "q6usb-dai", + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(q6usb_dai_device_id), + }, + .probe = q6usb_dai_dev_probe, + .remove = q6usb_dai_dev_remove, +}; +module_platform_driver(q6usb_dai_platform_driver); + +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Q6 USB backend dai driver"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Create a USB BE component that will register a new USB port to the ASoC USB framework. This will handle determination on if the requested audio profile is supported by the USB device currently selected. Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com> --- include/sound/q6usboffload.h | 20 +++ sound/soc/qcom/Kconfig | 4 + sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/Makefile | 1 + sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6usb.c | 232 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 257 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/sound/q6usboffload.h create mode 100644 sound/soc/qcom/qdsp6/q6usb.c