Message ID | 20221223094259.87373-17-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | MediaTek clocks cleanups and improvements | expand |
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 5:43 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> wrote: > > Like done for MT8192, join the two to register them in one shot, as > there's no point in doing that separately from one another. > > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> > --- > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8186-topckgen.c | 15 ++------------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8186-topckgen.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8186-topckgen.c > index d05143891b69..63befb1f492d 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8186-topckgen.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8186-topckgen.c > @@ -669,9 +669,6 @@ static struct mtk_composite top_muxes[] = { > MUX(CLK_TOP_APLL_I2S4_MCK_SEL, "apll_i2s4_mck_sel", apll_mck_parents, 0x0320, 19, 1), > MUX(CLK_TOP_APLL_TDMOUT_MCK_SEL, "apll_tdmout_mck_sel", apll_mck_parents, > 0x0320, 20, 1), > -}; > - > -static const struct mtk_composite top_adj_divs[] = { > DIV_GATE(CLK_TOP_APLL12_CK_DIV0, "apll12_div0", "apll_i2s0_mck_sel", > 0x0320, 0, 0x0328, 8, 0), > DIV_GATE(CLK_TOP_APLL12_CK_DIV1, "apll12_div1", "apll_i2s1_mck_sel", > @@ -747,26 +744,19 @@ static int clk_mt8186_topck_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (r) > goto unregister_muxes; > > - r = mtk_clk_register_composites(top_adj_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_adj_divs), base, > - &mt8186_clk_lock, clk_data, &pdev->dev); > - if (r) > - goto unregister_composite_muxes; > - > r = clk_mt8186_reg_mfg_mux_notifier(&pdev->dev, > clk_data->hws[CLK_TOP_MFG]->clk); > if (r) > - goto unregister_composite_divs; > + goto unregister_composite_muxes; > > r = of_clk_add_hw_provider(node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, clk_data); > if (r) > - goto unregister_composite_divs; > + goto unregister_composite_muxes; > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, clk_data); > > return r; > > -unregister_composite_divs: > - mtk_clk_unregister_composites(top_adj_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_adj_divs), clk_data); > unregister_composite_muxes: > mtk_clk_unregister_composites(top_muxes, ARRAY_SIZE(top_muxes), clk_data); > unregister_muxes: > @@ -787,7 +777,6 @@ static int clk_mt8186_topck_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > of_clk_del_provider(node); > mtk_clk_unregister_composites(top_adj_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_adj_divs), clk_data); > - mtk_clk_unregister_composites(top_muxes, ARRAY_SIZE(top_muxes), clk_data); Wrong line? Not sure how this would've compiled. > mtk_clk_unregister_muxes(top_mtk_muxes, ARRAY_SIZE(top_mtk_muxes), clk_data); > mtk_clk_unregister_factors(top_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_divs), clk_data); > mtk_clk_unregister_fixed_clks(top_fixed_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(top_fixed_clks), clk_data); > -- > 2.39.0 >
diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8186-topckgen.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8186-topckgen.c index d05143891b69..63befb1f492d 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8186-topckgen.c +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8186-topckgen.c @@ -669,9 +669,6 @@ static struct mtk_composite top_muxes[] = { MUX(CLK_TOP_APLL_I2S4_MCK_SEL, "apll_i2s4_mck_sel", apll_mck_parents, 0x0320, 19, 1), MUX(CLK_TOP_APLL_TDMOUT_MCK_SEL, "apll_tdmout_mck_sel", apll_mck_parents, 0x0320, 20, 1), -}; - -static const struct mtk_composite top_adj_divs[] = { DIV_GATE(CLK_TOP_APLL12_CK_DIV0, "apll12_div0", "apll_i2s0_mck_sel", 0x0320, 0, 0x0328, 8, 0), DIV_GATE(CLK_TOP_APLL12_CK_DIV1, "apll12_div1", "apll_i2s1_mck_sel", @@ -747,26 +744,19 @@ static int clk_mt8186_topck_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (r) goto unregister_muxes; - r = mtk_clk_register_composites(top_adj_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_adj_divs), base, - &mt8186_clk_lock, clk_data, &pdev->dev); - if (r) - goto unregister_composite_muxes; - r = clk_mt8186_reg_mfg_mux_notifier(&pdev->dev, clk_data->hws[CLK_TOP_MFG]->clk); if (r) - goto unregister_composite_divs; + goto unregister_composite_muxes; r = of_clk_add_hw_provider(node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, clk_data); if (r) - goto unregister_composite_divs; + goto unregister_composite_muxes; platform_set_drvdata(pdev, clk_data); return r; -unregister_composite_divs: - mtk_clk_unregister_composites(top_adj_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_adj_divs), clk_data); unregister_composite_muxes: mtk_clk_unregister_composites(top_muxes, ARRAY_SIZE(top_muxes), clk_data); unregister_muxes: @@ -787,7 +777,6 @@ static int clk_mt8186_topck_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) of_clk_del_provider(node); mtk_clk_unregister_composites(top_adj_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_adj_divs), clk_data); - mtk_clk_unregister_composites(top_muxes, ARRAY_SIZE(top_muxes), clk_data); mtk_clk_unregister_muxes(top_mtk_muxes, ARRAY_SIZE(top_mtk_muxes), clk_data); mtk_clk_unregister_factors(top_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_divs), clk_data); mtk_clk_unregister_fixed_clks(top_fixed_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(top_fixed_clks), clk_data);
Like done for MT8192, join the two to register them in one shot, as there's no point in doing that separately from one another. Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> --- drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8186-topckgen.c | 15 ++------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)