diff mbox series

[1/6] wifi: rtw89: fix potential wrong mapping for pkt-offload

Message ID 20230123065401.14174-2-pkshih@realtek.com
State New
Headers show
Series wifi: rtw89: prepare packets offload to support newer firmware | expand

Commit Message

Ping-Ke Shih Jan. 23, 2023, 6:53 a.m. UTC 
From: Chin-Yen Lee <timlee@realtek.com>

When driver fails to send H2C to firmware for pkt-offload, we should not
update the pkt_list of driver, and need to release allocated pkt index to
avoid wrong mapping between driver and firmware.

Signed-off-by: Chin-Yen Lee <timlee@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Kalle Valo Feb. 13, 2023, 5:17 p.m. UTC | #1 
Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote:

> From: Chin-Yen Lee <timlee@realtek.com>
> 
> When driver fails to send H2C to firmware for pkt-offload, we should not
> update the pkt_list of driver, and need to release allocated pkt index to
> avoid wrong mapping between driver and firmware.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chin-Yen Lee <timlee@realtek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>

6 patches applied to wireless-next.git, thanks.

b8e8ff842b1b wifi: rtw89: fix potential wrong mapping for pkt-offload
5c12bb66b79d wifi: rtw89: refine packet offload flow
5da5ba7e6ec4 wifi: rtw89: add use of pkt_list offload to debug entry
2e5a65f5952f wifi: rtw89: 8852b: reset IDMEM mode to default value
e5624482ba3e wifi: rtw89: 8852b: don't support LPS-PG mode after firmware 0.29.26.0
7410bd727584 wifi: rtw89: 8852b: try to use NORMAL_CE type firmware first
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
index 85c7172e931bf..210785149801b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
@@ -948,13 +948,13 @@  static int rtw89_fw_h2c_add_wow_fw_ofld(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 	if (!skb)
 		goto err;
 
-	list_add_tail(&info->list, &rtw_wow->pkt_list);
 	ret = rtw89_fw_h2c_add_pkt_offload(rtwdev, &info->id, skb);
 	kfree_skb(skb);
 
 	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+		goto err;
 
+	list_add_tail(&info->list, &rtw_wow->pkt_list);
 	*id = info->id;
 	return 0;
 
@@ -2133,6 +2133,7 @@  int rtw89_fw_h2c_add_pkt_offload(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u8 *id,
 	skb = rtw89_fw_h2c_alloc_skb_with_hdr(rtwdev, H2C_LEN_PKT_OFLD + skb_ofld->len);
 	if (!skb) {
 		rtw89_err(rtwdev, "failed to alloc skb for h2c pkt offload\n");
+		rtw89_core_release_bit_map(rtwdev->pkt_offload, alloc_id);
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 	skb_put(skb, H2C_LEN_PKT_OFLD);
@@ -2151,6 +2152,7 @@  int rtw89_fw_h2c_add_pkt_offload(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u8 *id,
 	ret = rtw89_h2c_tx(rtwdev, skb, false);
 	if (ret) {
 		rtw89_err(rtwdev, "failed to send h2c\n");
+		rtw89_core_release_bit_map(rtwdev->pkt_offload, alloc_id);
 		goto fail;
 	}
 
@@ -2684,13 +2686,14 @@  static int rtw89_append_probe_req_ie(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		list_add_tail(&info->list, &scan_info->pkt_list[band]);
 		ret = rtw89_fw_h2c_add_pkt_offload(rtwdev, &info->id, new);
 		if (ret) {
 			kfree_skb(new);
+			kfree(info);
 			goto out;
 		}
 
+		list_add_tail(&info->list, &scan_info->pkt_list[band]);
 		kfree_skb(new);
 	}
 out: