| Message ID | 1459777611-22592-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On 04/04/16 14:55, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Hi Sudeep, > > On 04/04/16 14:46, Sudeep Holla wrote: [...] >> @@ -1270,12 +1279,7 @@ static int init_hyp_mode(void) >> free_boot_hyp_pgd(); >> #endif >> >> - cpu_notifier_register_begin(); >> - >> - err = __register_cpu_notifier(&hyp_init_cpu_nb); >> - >> - cpu_notifier_register_done(); >> - >> + err = register_cpu_notifier(&hyp_init_cpu_nb); > > We went from something like this to the cpu_notifier_register_begin/end > with 8146875de ("arm, kvm: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration"). > > What makes it more acceptable now? > Correct, but in the initial code even init_hyp_mode was protected under cpu_notifier_register_begin, but IIUC recent re-org eliminated the need for that and the above code exactly resembles what register_cpu_notifier does. If that's not the case then we need to move cpu_notifier_register_begin further up and retain __register_cpu_notifier I mainly changed it to keep it consistent with unregister call. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c index 6accd66d26f0..42b3a1f83271 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c @@ -1101,10 +1101,17 @@ static void __init hyp_cpu_pm_init(void) { cpu_pm_register_notifier(&hyp_init_cpu_pm_nb); } +static void __init hyp_cpu_pm_exit(void) +{ + cpu_pm_unregister_notifier(&hyp_init_cpu_pm_nb); +} #else static inline void hyp_cpu_pm_init(void) { } +static inline void hyp_cpu_pm_exit(void) +{ +} #endif static void teardown_common_resources(void) @@ -1166,6 +1173,8 @@ static void teardown_hyp_mode(void) free_hyp_pgds(); for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) free_page(per_cpu(kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page, cpu)); + unregister_cpu_notifier(&hyp_init_cpu_nb); + hyp_cpu_pm_exit(); } static int init_vhe_mode(void) @@ -1270,12 +1279,7 @@ static int init_hyp_mode(void) free_boot_hyp_pgd(); #endif - cpu_notifier_register_begin(); - - err = __register_cpu_notifier(&hyp_init_cpu_nb); - - cpu_notifier_register_done(); - + err = register_cpu_notifier(&hyp_init_cpu_nb); if (err) { kvm_err("Cannot register HYP init CPU notifier (%d)\n", err); goto out_err;
Commit 1e947bad0b63 ("arm64: KVM: Skip HYP setup when already running in HYP") re-organized the hyp init code and ended up leaving the CPU hotplug and PM notifier even if hyp mode initialization fails. Since KVM is not yet supported with ACPI, the above mentioned commit breaks CPU hotplug in ACPI boot. This patch fixes teardown_hyp_mode to properly unregister both CPU hotplug and PM notifiers in the teardown path. Fixes: 1e947bad0b63 ("arm64: KVM: Skip HYP setup when already running in HYP") Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> --- arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 16 ++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 1.9.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel