Message ID | 20230411001132.1239225-1-bvanassche@acm.org |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | scsi: ufs: Increase the START STOP UNIT timeout from 1 s to 10 s | expand |
On 12/04/23 19:34, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 4/11/23 11:31, Adrian Hunter wrote: >> It would be better not to assume current stable trees are the only >> consumers of fixes. Presumably adding the extra Fixes tag does no >> harm. > > Hi Adrian, > > The convention is to add a reference to the most recent patch that got fixed in the patch description. Anyone who backports fixes is assumed to follow the chain of patches transitively that is created by Fixes: tags. Wouldn't that only work if commit dcd5b7637c6d had a Fixes tag too.
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c index 03c47f9a2750..8363a1667feb 100644 --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c @@ -9181,7 +9181,8 @@ static int ufshcd_execute_start_stop(struct scsi_device *sdev, }; return scsi_execute_cmd(sdev, cdb, REQ_OP_DRV_IN, /*buffer=*/NULL, - /*bufflen=*/0, /*timeout=*/HZ, /*retries=*/0, &args); + /*bufflen=*/0, /*timeout=*/10 * HZ, /*retries=*/0, + &args); } /**
One UFS vendor asked to increase the UFS timeout from 1 s to 3 s. Another UFS vendor asked to increase the UFS timeout from 1 s to 10 s. Hence this patch that increases the UFS timeout to 10 s. This patch can cause the total timeout to exceed 20 s, the Android shutdown timeout. This is fine since the loop around ufshcd_execute_start_stop() exists to deal with unit attentions and because unit attentions are reported quickly. Fixes: dcd5b7637c6d ("scsi: ufs: Reduce the START STOP UNIT timeout") Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> --- drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)