Message ID | 20230418122403.3178462-14-yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | PCI: rcar-gen4: Add R-Car Gen4 PCIe support | expand |
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 09:23:54PM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > One of PCIe controllers have an unexpected register value on Which PCI controller? > the dbi+0x97b register. So, add a new capability flag "EDMA_UNROLL" > which would force the unrolled eDMA mapping for the problematic > device, as suggested by Serge Semin. > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> Should this patch have a Suggested-by tag? > --- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 8 +++++++- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 5 +++-- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > index 2413cd39310c..feb6ab9d4944 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > @@ -920,8 +920,14 @@ static int dw_pcie_edma_find_chip(struct dw_pcie *pci) > * Indirect eDMA CSRs access has been completely removed since v5.40a > * thus no space is now reserved for the eDMA channels viewport and > * former DMA CTRL register is no longer fixed to FFs. > + * > + * Note some devices for unknown reason may have zeros in the eDMA CTRL Again, it is good to mention what controllers are exhibiting this behavior. - Mani > + * register even though the HW-manual explicitly states there must FFs > + * if the unrolled mapping is enabled. For such cases the low-level > + * drivers are supposed to manually activate the unrolled mapping to > + * bypass the auto-detection procedure. > */ > - if (dw_pcie_ver_is_ge(pci, 540A)) > + if (dw_pcie_ver_is_ge(pci, 540A) || dw_pcie_cap_is(pci, EDMA_UNROLL)) > val = 0xFFFFFFFF; > else > val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_DMA_VIEWPORT_BASE + PCIE_DMA_CTRL); > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > index 8c08159ea08e..c4bdfed7b2e2 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > @@ -54,8 +54,9 @@ > > /* DWC PCIe controller capabilities */ > #define DW_PCIE_CAP_REQ_RES 0 > -#define DW_PCIE_CAP_IATU_UNROLL 1 > -#define DW_PCIE_CAP_CDM_CHECK 2 > +#define DW_PCIE_CAP_EDMA_UNROLL 1 > +#define DW_PCIE_CAP_IATU_UNROLL 2 > +#define DW_PCIE_CAP_CDM_CHECK 3 > > #define dw_pcie_cap_is(_pci, _cap) \ > test_bit(DW_PCIE_CAP_ ## _cap, &(_pci)->caps) > -- > 2.25.1 >
Hi Manivannan, > From: Manivannan Sadhasivam, Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2023 10:57 PM > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 09:23:54PM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > > One of PCIe controllers have an unexpected register value on > > Which PCI controller? Renesas R-Car S4-8. So, I'll revise the description like below: Renesas R-Car S4-8 PCIe controller has ... > > the dbi+0x97b register. So, add a new capability flag "EDMA_UNROLL" > > which would force the unrolled eDMA mapping for the problematic > > device, as suggested by Serge Semin. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> > > Should this patch have a Suggested-by tag? You're correct. I'll add the following: Suggested-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 8 +++++++- > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 5 +++-- > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > > index 2413cd39310c..feb6ab9d4944 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > > @@ -920,8 +920,14 @@ static int dw_pcie_edma_find_chip(struct dw_pcie *pci) > > * Indirect eDMA CSRs access has been completely removed since v5.40a > > * thus no space is now reserved for the eDMA channels viewport and > > * former DMA CTRL register is no longer fixed to FFs. > > + * > > + * Note some devices for unknown reason may have zeros in the eDMA CTRL > > Again, it is good to mention what controllers are exhibiting this behavior. I got it. I'll revise the comment like below: Note Renesas R-Car S4-8 PCIe controller for unknown reason may have ... Best regards, Yoshihiro Shimoda > - Mani > > > + * register even though the HW-manual explicitly states there must FFs > > + * if the unrolled mapping is enabled. For such cases the low-level > > + * drivers are supposed to manually activate the unrolled mapping to > > + * bypass the auto-detection procedure. > > */ > > - if (dw_pcie_ver_is_ge(pci, 540A)) > > + if (dw_pcie_ver_is_ge(pci, 540A) || dw_pcie_cap_is(pci, EDMA_UNROLL)) > > val = 0xFFFFFFFF; > > else > > val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_DMA_VIEWPORT_BASE + PCIE_DMA_CTRL); > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > > index 8c08159ea08e..c4bdfed7b2e2 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > > @@ -54,8 +54,9 @@ > > > > /* DWC PCIe controller capabilities */ > > #define DW_PCIE_CAP_REQ_RES 0 > > -#define DW_PCIE_CAP_IATU_UNROLL 1 > > -#define DW_PCIE_CAP_CDM_CHECK 2 > > +#define DW_PCIE_CAP_EDMA_UNROLL 1 > > +#define DW_PCIE_CAP_IATU_UNROLL 2 > > +#define DW_PCIE_CAP_CDM_CHECK 3 > > > > #define dw_pcie_cap_is(_pci, _cap) \ > > test_bit(DW_PCIE_CAP_ ## _cap, &(_pci)->caps) > > -- > > 2.25.1 > > > > -- > மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c index 2413cd39310c..feb6ab9d4944 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c @@ -920,8 +920,14 @@ static int dw_pcie_edma_find_chip(struct dw_pcie *pci) * Indirect eDMA CSRs access has been completely removed since v5.40a * thus no space is now reserved for the eDMA channels viewport and * former DMA CTRL register is no longer fixed to FFs. + * + * Note some devices for unknown reason may have zeros in the eDMA CTRL + * register even though the HW-manual explicitly states there must FFs + * if the unrolled mapping is enabled. For such cases the low-level + * drivers are supposed to manually activate the unrolled mapping to + * bypass the auto-detection procedure. */ - if (dw_pcie_ver_is_ge(pci, 540A)) + if (dw_pcie_ver_is_ge(pci, 540A) || dw_pcie_cap_is(pci, EDMA_UNROLL)) val = 0xFFFFFFFF; else val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_DMA_VIEWPORT_BASE + PCIE_DMA_CTRL); diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h index 8c08159ea08e..c4bdfed7b2e2 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h @@ -54,8 +54,9 @@ /* DWC PCIe controller capabilities */ #define DW_PCIE_CAP_REQ_RES 0 -#define DW_PCIE_CAP_IATU_UNROLL 1 -#define DW_PCIE_CAP_CDM_CHECK 2 +#define DW_PCIE_CAP_EDMA_UNROLL 1 +#define DW_PCIE_CAP_IATU_UNROLL 2 +#define DW_PCIE_CAP_CDM_CHECK 3 #define dw_pcie_cap_is(_pci, _cap) \ test_bit(DW_PCIE_CAP_ ## _cap, &(_pci)->caps)
One of PCIe controllers have an unexpected register value on the dbi+0x97b register. So, add a new capability flag "EDMA_UNROLL" which would force the unrolled eDMA mapping for the problematic device, as suggested by Serge Semin. Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> --- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 8 +++++++- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)