| Message ID | 20230420160923.14127-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | ACPI: x86: Separate out the Microsoft _DSM function calls | expand |
Hi Mario,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 7124d7671af0facf115d70f9d1fadde0d768d325]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mario-Limonciello/ACPI-x86-Separate-out-the-Microsoft-_DSM-function-calls/20230421-001547
base: 7124d7671af0facf115d70f9d1fadde0d768d325
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230420160923.14127-1-mario.limonciello%40amd.com
patch subject: [PATCH] ACPI: x86: Separate out the Microsoft _DSM function calls
config: i386-randconfig-a002-20230424 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230424/202304242025.fz8SDA8d-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/e4ea0d2f15f2d0486bc3b4f59cbf9cea6c63fda1
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Mario-Limonciello/ACPI-x86-Separate-out-the-Microsoft-_DSM-function-calls/20230421-001547
git checkout e4ea0d2f15f2d0486bc3b4f59cbf9cea6c63fda1
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 olddefconfig
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/acpi/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304242025.fz8SDA8d-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c:552:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'lps0_s2idle_wake' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
bool lps0_s2idle_wake(void)
^
drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c:552:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
bool lps0_s2idle_wake(void)
^
static
1 warning generated.
vim +/lps0_s2idle_wake +552 drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
551
> 552 bool lps0_s2idle_wake(void)
553 {
554 if (!lps0_device_handle || sleep_no_lps0)
555 goto out;
556
557 /* avoid running on the first go through the s2idle loop */
558 if (lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft > 0) {
559 int target;
560
561 if (lps0_dsm_state == ACPI_LPS0_ENTRY ||
562 lps0_dsm_state == ACPI_LPS0_MS_EXIT)
563 target = ACPI_LPS0_MS_ENTRY;
564 else
565 target = ACPI_LPS0_MS_EXIT;
566 acpi_sleep_run_lps0_dsm(target,
567 lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft,
568 lps0_dsm_guid_microsoft);
569 }
570 out:
571 return acpi_s2idle_wake();
572 }
573
[Public] > -----Original Message----- > From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2023 10:14 > To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>; rafael@kernel.org; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; S-k, Shyam-sundar > <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>; Limonciello, Mario > <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>; Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>; linux- > acpi@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: x86: Separate out the Microsoft _DSM function calls > > Hi Mario, > > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: > > [auto build test WARNING on 7124d7671af0facf115d70f9d1fadde0d768d325] > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mario-Limonciello/ACPI- > x86-Separate-out-the-Microsoft-_DSM-function-calls/20230421-001547 > base: 7124d7671af0facf115d70f9d1fadde0d768d325 > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230420160923.14127-1- > mario.limonciello%40amd.com > patch subject: [PATCH] ACPI: x86: Separate out the Microsoft _DSM function > calls > config: i386-randconfig-s003 (https://download.01.org/0day- > ci/archive/20230424/202304242231.68KXGyif-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-8) 11.3.0 > reproduce: > # apt-get install sparse > # sparse version: v0.6.4-39-gce1a6720-dirty > # https://github.com/intel-lab- > lkp/linux/commit/e4ea0d2f15f2d0486bc3b4f59cbf9cea6c63fda1 > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Mario-Limonciello/ACPI-x86-Separate-out- > the-Microsoft-_DSM-function-calls/20230421-001547 > git checkout e4ea0d2f15f2d0486bc3b4f59cbf9cea6c63fda1 > # save the config file > mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config > make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' O=build_dir > ARCH=i386 olddefconfig > make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' O=build_dir > ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/acpi/ > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > | Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304242231.68KXGyif- > lkp@intel.com/ > > sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) > drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c:479:13: sparse: sparse: restricted suspend_state_t > degrades to integer > drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c:479:33: sparse: sparse: restricted suspend_state_t > degrades to integer > >> drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c:552:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'lps0_s2idle_wake' > was not declared. Should it be static? > Besides the problem caught by the robot I was looking at a BIOS debug log for Windows recently and noticed the events come in a different order. I re-reviewed the Microsoft spec and it makes it clear we've been doing it wrong in Linux too. On the way down it should be 3->7->5 On the way back up it should be: 6->8->4 I need to redo all of my testing with this new assumption before I'm confident on such a change. I'll include an assertion of confidence from that testing to help decide if this should actually wait for 6.5.
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c index e499c60c4579..1772d981c5e9 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ static int lps0_dsm_func_mask; static guid_t lps0_dsm_guid_microsoft; static int lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft; +static int lps0_dsm_state; /* Device constraint entry structure */ struct lpi_device_info { @@ -320,6 +321,44 @@ static void lpi_check_constraints(void) } } +static bool acpi_s2idle_vendor_amd(void) +{ + return boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD; +} + +static const char *acpi_sleep_dsm_state_to_str(unsigned int state) +{ + if (lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft || !acpi_s2idle_vendor_amd()) { + switch (state) { + case ACPI_LPS0_SCREEN_OFF: + return "screen off"; + case ACPI_LPS0_SCREEN_ON: + return "screen on"; + case ACPI_LPS0_ENTRY: + return "lps0 entry"; + case ACPI_LPS0_EXIT: + return "lps0 exit"; + case ACPI_LPS0_MS_ENTRY: + return "lps0 ms entry"; + case ACPI_LPS0_MS_EXIT: + return "lps0 ms exit"; + }; + } else { + switch (state) { + case ACPI_LPS0_SCREEN_ON_AMD: + return "screen on"; + case ACPI_LPS0_SCREEN_OFF_AMD: + return "screen off"; + case ACPI_LPS0_ENTRY_AMD: + return "lps0 entry"; + case ACPI_LPS0_EXIT_AMD: + return "lps0 exit"; + } + } + + return "unknown"; +} + static void acpi_sleep_run_lps0_dsm(unsigned int func, unsigned int func_mask, guid_t dsm_guid) { union acpi_object *out_obj; @@ -331,13 +370,13 @@ static void acpi_sleep_run_lps0_dsm(unsigned int func, unsigned int func_mask, g rev_id, func, NULL); ACPI_FREE(out_obj); - acpi_handle_debug(lps0_device_handle, "_DSM function %u evaluation %s\n", - func, out_obj ? "successful" : "failed"); -} - -static bool acpi_s2idle_vendor_amd(void) -{ - return boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD; + lps0_dsm_state = func; + if (pm_debug_messages_on) { + acpi_handle_info(lps0_device_handle, + "%s transitioned to state %s\n", + out_obj ? "Successfully" : "Failed to", + acpi_sleep_dsm_state_to_str(lps0_dsm_state)); + } } static int validate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const char *uuid, int rev, guid_t *dsm_guid) @@ -487,9 +526,6 @@ int acpi_s2idle_prepare_late(void) if (lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft > 0) { acpi_sleep_run_lps0_dsm(ACPI_LPS0_ENTRY, lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft, lps0_dsm_guid_microsoft); - /* modern standby entry */ - acpi_sleep_run_lps0_dsm(ACPI_LPS0_MS_ENTRY, - lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft, lps0_dsm_guid_microsoft); } list_for_each_entry(handler, &lps0_s2idle_devops_head, list_node) { @@ -513,6 +549,28 @@ void acpi_s2idle_check(void) } } +bool lps0_s2idle_wake(void) +{ + if (!lps0_device_handle || sleep_no_lps0) + goto out; + + /* avoid running on the first go through the s2idle loop */ + if (lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft > 0) { + int target; + + if (lps0_dsm_state == ACPI_LPS0_ENTRY || + lps0_dsm_state == ACPI_LPS0_MS_EXIT) + target = ACPI_LPS0_MS_ENTRY; + else + target = ACPI_LPS0_MS_EXIT; + acpi_sleep_run_lps0_dsm(target, + lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft, + lps0_dsm_guid_microsoft); + } +out: + return acpi_s2idle_wake(); +} + void acpi_s2idle_restore_early(void) { struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops *handler; @@ -524,11 +582,6 @@ void acpi_s2idle_restore_early(void) if (handler->restore) handler->restore(); - /* Modern standby exit */ - if (lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft > 0) - acpi_sleep_run_lps0_dsm(ACPI_LPS0_MS_EXIT, - lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft, lps0_dsm_guid_microsoft); - /* LPS0 exit */ if (lps0_dsm_func_mask > 0) acpi_sleep_run_lps0_dsm(acpi_s2idle_vendor_amd() ? @@ -555,7 +608,7 @@ static const struct platform_s2idle_ops acpi_s2idle_ops_lps0 = { .prepare = acpi_s2idle_prepare, .prepare_late = acpi_s2idle_prepare_late, .check = acpi_s2idle_check, - .wake = acpi_s2idle_wake, + .wake = lps0_s2idle_wake, .restore_early = acpi_s2idle_restore_early, .restore = acpi_s2idle_restore, .end = acpi_s2idle_end,
When utilizing the Microsoft _DSM there are six calls which correspond to the following states: 1) Idle (Screen on) 2) Idle (Screen off) 3) Low Power 4) Modern Standby Currently Linux compresses these and treats this as two states: 1) Awake 2) s2idle That is when the system has woken from s2idle from a pure ACPI event the _DSM state is still Modern Standby at this time, and so some firmware will not run other code that communicates with the EC. To fix this, track the active state in the s2idle code and ensure that "Modern Standby enter" is called after the ACPI SCI has been processed from `acpi_s2idle_wake` and every time that the system is woken up call "Modern Standby exit". Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> --- drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) base-commit: 7124d7671af0facf115d70f9d1fadde0d768d325