diff mbox series

[wireless,v2] wifi: rtw88: sdio: Always use two consecutive bytes for word operations

Message ID 20230515195043.572375-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com
State New
Headers show
Series [wireless,v2] wifi: rtw88: sdio: Always use two consecutive bytes for word operations | expand

Commit Message

Martin Blumenstingl May 15, 2023, 7:50 p.m. UTC
The Allwinner sunxi-mmc controller cannot handle word (16 bit)
transfers. So and sdio_{read,write}w fails with messages like the
following example using an RTL8822BS (but the same problems were also
observed with RTL8822CS and RTL8723DS chips):
  rtw_8822bs mmc1:0001:1: Firmware version 27.2.0, H2C version 13
  sunxi-mmc 4021000.mmc: unaligned scatterlist: os f80 length 2
  sunxi-mmc 4021000.mmc: map DMA failed
  rtw_8822bs mmc1:0001:1: sdio read16 failed (0x10230): -22

Use two consecutive single byte accesses for word operations instead. It
turns out that upon closer inspection this is also what the vendor
driver does, even though it does have support for sdio_{read,write}w. So
we can conclude that the rtw88 chips do support word access but only on
SDIO controllers that also support it. Since there's no way to detect if
the controller supports word access or not the rtw88 sdio driver
switches to the easiest approach: avoiding word access.

Reported-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/527585e5-9cdd-66ed-c3af-6da162f4b720@lwfinger.net/
Reported-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com>
Link: https://github.com/LibreELEC/LibreELEC.tv/pull/7837#issue-1708469467
Fixes: 65371a3f14e7 ("wifi: rtw88: sdio: Add HCI implementation for SDIO based chipsets")
Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- Added Link to Rudi Heitbaum's issue report
- Added Ping-Ke's Reviewed-by (thank you!)
- Cc'ed linux-sunxi


 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/sdio.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

Comments

Kalle Valo May 17, 2023, 6:09 a.m. UTC | #1
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> wrote:

> The Allwinner sunxi-mmc controller cannot handle word (16 bit)
> transfers. So and sdio_{read,write}w fails with messages like the
> following example using an RTL8822BS (but the same problems were also
> observed with RTL8822CS and RTL8723DS chips):
>   rtw_8822bs mmc1:0001:1: Firmware version 27.2.0, H2C version 13
>   sunxi-mmc 4021000.mmc: unaligned scatterlist: os f80 length 2
>   sunxi-mmc 4021000.mmc: map DMA failed
>   rtw_8822bs mmc1:0001:1: sdio read16 failed (0x10230): -22
> 
> Use two consecutive single byte accesses for word operations instead. It
> turns out that upon closer inspection this is also what the vendor
> driver does, even though it does have support for sdio_{read,write}w. So
> we can conclude that the rtw88 chips do support word access but only on
> SDIO controllers that also support it. Since there's no way to detect if
> the controller supports word access or not the rtw88 sdio driver
> switches to the easiest approach: avoiding word access.
> 
> Reported-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/527585e5-9cdd-66ed-c3af-6da162f4b720@lwfinger.net/
> Reported-by: Rudi Heitbaum <rudi@heitbaum.com>
> Link: https://github.com/LibreELEC/LibreELEC.tv/pull/7837#issue-1708469467
> Fixes: 65371a3f14e7 ("wifi: rtw88: sdio: Add HCI implementation for SDIO based chipsets")
> Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>

Patch applied to wireless.git, thanks.

cb0ddaaa5db0 wifi: rtw88: sdio: Always use two consecutive bytes for word operations
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/sdio.c
index af0459a79899..06fce7c3adda 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/sdio.c
@@ -87,11 +87,6 @@  static void rtw_sdio_writew(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u16 val, u32 addr,
 	u8 buf[2];
 	int i;
 
-	if (rtw_sdio_use_memcpy_io(rtwdev, addr, 2)) {
-		sdio_writew(rtwsdio->sdio_func, val, addr, err_ret);
-		return;
-	}
-
 	*(__le16 *)buf = cpu_to_le16(val);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
@@ -125,9 +120,6 @@  static u16 rtw_sdio_readw(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u32 addr, int *err_ret)
 	u8 buf[2];
 	int i;
 
-	if (rtw_sdio_use_memcpy_io(rtwdev, addr, 2))
-		return sdio_readw(rtwsdio->sdio_func, addr, err_ret);
-
 	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
 		buf[i] = sdio_readb(rtwsdio->sdio_func, addr + i, err_ret);
 		if (*err_ret)