diff mbox

[PULL,11/59] KVM: arm/arm64: Fix MMIO emulation data handling

Message ID 1464080993-10884-12-git-send-email-christoffer.dall@linaro.org
State Accepted
Commit 83091db981e105d97562d3ed3ffe676e21927e3a
Headers show

Commit Message

Christoffer Dall May 24, 2016, 9:09 a.m. UTC 
When the kernel was handling a guest MMIO read access internally, we
need to copy the emulation result into the run->mmio structure in order
for the kvm_handle_mmio_return() function to pick it up and inject the
	result back into the guest.

Currently the only user of kvm_io_bus for ARM is the VGIC, which did
this copying itself, so this was not causing issues so far.

But with the upcoming new vgic implementation we need this done
properly.

Update the kvm_handle_mmio_return description and cleanup the code to
only perform a single copying when needed.

Code and commit message inspired by Andre Przywara.

Reported-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>

---
 arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c | 14 +++++++-------
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c |  7 -------
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

-- 
2.1.2.330.g565301e.dirty


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c
index 0f6600f..0158e9e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c
@@ -87,11 +87,10 @@  static unsigned long mmio_read_buf(char *buf, unsigned int len)
 
 /**
  * kvm_handle_mmio_return -- Handle MMIO loads after user space emulation
+ *			     or in-kernel IO emulation
+ *
  * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
  * @run:  The VCPU run struct containing the mmio data
- *
- * This should only be called after returning from userspace for MMIO load
- * emulation.
  */
 int kvm_handle_mmio_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 {
@@ -206,18 +205,19 @@  int io_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
 	run->mmio.is_write	= is_write;
 	run->mmio.phys_addr	= fault_ipa;
 	run->mmio.len		= len;
-	if (is_write)
-		memcpy(run->mmio.data, data_buf, len);
 
 	if (!ret) {
 		/* We handled the access successfully in the kernel. */
+		if (!is_write)
+			memcpy(run->mmio.data, data_buf, len);
 		vcpu->stat.mmio_exit_kernel++;
 		kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu, run);
 		return 1;
-	} else {
-		vcpu->stat.mmio_exit_user++;
 	}
 
+	if (is_write)
+		memcpy(run->mmio.data, data_buf, len);
+	vcpu->stat.mmio_exit_user++;
 	run->exit_reason	= KVM_EXIT_MMIO;
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
index f76bb64..c3bfbb9 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
@@ -819,7 +819,6 @@  static int vgic_handle_mmio_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic;
 	struct vgic_io_device *iodev = container_of(this,
 						    struct vgic_io_device, dev);
-	struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
 	const struct vgic_io_range *range;
 	struct kvm_exit_mmio mmio;
 	bool updated_state;
@@ -848,12 +847,6 @@  static int vgic_handle_mmio_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		updated_state = false;
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&dist->lock);
-	run->mmio.is_write	= is_write;
-	run->mmio.len		= len;
-	run->mmio.phys_addr	= addr;
-	memcpy(run->mmio.data, val, len);
-
-	kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu, run);
 
 	if (updated_state)
 		vgic_kick_vcpus(vcpu->kvm);