| Message ID | 29943059c80c8db0db437f9548f084a67326647b.1684856131.git.geert+renesas@glider.be |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | dt-bindings: backlight: pwm: Make power-supply not required | expand |
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/pwm-backlight.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/pwm-backlight.yaml index 5ec47a8c6568b60e..53569028899020d6 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/pwm-backlight.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/pwm-backlight.yaml @@ -68,7 +68,6 @@ dependencies: required: - compatible - pwms - - power-supply additionalProperties: false
make dtbs_check: arch/arm/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7742-iwg21d-q7.dtb: backlight: 'power-supply' is a required property From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/pwm-backlight.yaml As that backlight device node already has an "enable-gpios" property to control the power supplied to the backlight, it sounds a bit silly to have to add a "power-supply" property just to silence this warning. In addition, as of commit deaeeda2051fa280 ("backlight: pwm_bl: Don't rely on a disabled PWM emiting inactive state"), the Linux driver considers the power supply optional. Fix this by synchronizing the bindings with actual driver behavior by making the "power-supply" optional. Fixes: deaeeda2051fa280 ("backlight: pwm_bl: Don't rely on a disabled PWM emiting inactive state") Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> --- As commit deaeeda2051fa280 was only upstreamed in v6.3, I'm wondering if the backlight on the iWave Systems RainboW-G20D/G21D Qseven and RainboW-G22D-SODIMM boards worked before? I don't have the hardware. Thanks! --- .../devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/pwm-backlight.yaml | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)