| Message ID | 20230608221050.217968-1-nfraprado@collabora.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Revert "ASoC: mediatek: mt8192-mt6359: Remove " Jack" from Headphone pin name" | expand |
Il 09/06/23 00:10, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto: > This reverts commit cbbc0ec6dea09c815f1d1ef0abaf3f2ec89ff11f. That > commit removed the " Jack" suffix with the reasoning that it is > automatically added to the name of the kcontrol created, which is true, > but this name is also used to look for the DAPM widget that will be > toggled when the jack status is updated. Since the widget is still > called "Headphone Jack" the jack can't link to the widget and the > following error is shown: > > mt8192_mt6359 sound: ASoC: DAPM unknown pin Headphone > > It is not possible to also rename the headphone DAPM widget because its > name is used by a switch kcontrol, "Headphone Jack Switch", both to link > to the headphone widget and to assemble its name. This switch's name is > referenced in the upstream UCM file, so renaming it would break > userspace. Since the original commit didn't bring any benefit, besides > sparing a few CPU cycles, simply revert it. > > Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> > That commit is made to bring consistency in naming across MediaTek (with other) sound card drivers.. I'm not sure whether the right solution would be to revert this one, or to make a small change in the UCM, counting that we'd be able to add more shared names around, finally reducing the config length by sharing actual configurations across various SoCs. Any opinion? Thanks, Angelo > --- > > sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-mt6359-rt1015-rt5682.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-mt6359-rt1015-rt5682.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-mt6359-rt1015-rt5682.c > index 4e0d5bf12b47..5e163e23a207 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-mt6359-rt1015-rt5682.c > +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-mt6359-rt1015-rt5682.c > @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ struct mt8192_mt6359_priv { > /* Headset jack detection DAPM pins */ > static struct snd_soc_jack_pin mt8192_jack_pins[] = { > { > - .pin = "Headphone", > + .pin = "Headphone Jack", > .mask = SND_JACK_HEADPHONE, > }, > {
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 06:10:48PM -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote: > This reverts commit cbbc0ec6dea09c815f1d1ef0abaf3f2ec89ff11f. That > commit removed the " Jack" suffix with the reasoning that it is > automatically added to the name of the kcontrol created, which is true, Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the subsystem, this makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches. Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are doing and make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're doing. There's no need to resubmit to fix this alone. Please include human readable descriptions of things like commits and issues being discussed in e-mail in your mails, this makes them much easier for humans to read especially when they have no internet access. I do frequently catch up on my mail on flights or while otherwise travelling so this is even more pressing for me than just being about making things a bit easier to read.
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 09:08:47AM -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 10:39:25AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the > > subsystem, this makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches. > > Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are doing and > > make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're doing. > > There's no need to resubmit to fix this alone. > just for my own reference in the future, what exactly should have been done > differently in this commit? Are the subject line and commit reference in the > message generated by 'git revert' no good? Or is this message from a bot that > can't handle revert commits? Yes, what git revert generates by default are no good and you should edit it to look like a normal commit message with a standard subject line and standard way of referencing other commits.
diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-mt6359-rt1015-rt5682.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-mt6359-rt1015-rt5682.c index 4e0d5bf12b47..5e163e23a207 100644 --- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-mt6359-rt1015-rt5682.c +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-mt6359-rt1015-rt5682.c @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ struct mt8192_mt6359_priv { /* Headset jack detection DAPM pins */ static struct snd_soc_jack_pin mt8192_jack_pins[] = { { - .pin = "Headphone", + .pin = "Headphone Jack", .mask = SND_JACK_HEADPHONE, }, {
This reverts commit cbbc0ec6dea09c815f1d1ef0abaf3f2ec89ff11f. That commit removed the " Jack" suffix with the reasoning that it is automatically added to the name of the kcontrol created, which is true, but this name is also used to look for the DAPM widget that will be toggled when the jack status is updated. Since the widget is still called "Headphone Jack" the jack can't link to the widget and the following error is shown: mt8192_mt6359 sound: ASoC: DAPM unknown pin Headphone It is not possible to also rename the headphone DAPM widget because its name is used by a switch kcontrol, "Headphone Jack Switch", both to link to the headphone widget and to assemble its name. This switch's name is referenced in the upstream UCM file, so renaming it would break userspace. Since the original commit didn't bring any benefit, besides sparing a few CPU cycles, simply revert it. Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> --- sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-mt6359-rt1015-rt5682.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)