diff mbox series

[v1,1/2] scsi: ufs: core: Add advanced RPMB support where UFSHCI 4.0 does not support EHS length in UTRD

Message ID 20230809181847.102123-2-beanhuo@iokpp.de
State New
Headers show
Series Changes for UFS advanced RPMB | expand

Commit Message

Bean Huo Aug. 9, 2023, 6:18 p.m. UTC 
From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>

According to UFSHCI 4.0 specification:

5.2 Host Controller Capabilities Registers
5.2.1 Offset 00h: CAP – Controller Capabilities:

" EHS Length in UTRD Supported (EHSLUTRDS): Indicates whether the host
controller supports EHS Length field in UTRD.
0 – Host controller takes EHS length from CMD UPIU, and SW driver use EHS Length field in CMD UPIU.
1 – HW controller takes EHS length from UTRD, and SW driver use EHS Length field in UTRD.
NOTE Recommend Host controllers move to taking EHS length from UTRD, and in UFS-5, it will be
mandatory."

So, when UFSHCI 4.0 doesn't support EHS Length field in UTRD, we could use EHS Length field in CMD
UPIU. This patch aims to remove the limitation that advanced RPMB only works when EHS length is
supported in UTRD.

Fixes: 6ff265fc5ef6 ("scsi: ufs: core: bsg: Add advanced RPMB support in ufs_bsg")
Signed-off-by: jonghwi.rha <jonghwi.rha@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
---
 drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c |  3 +--
 drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c  | 10 +++++++++-
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
index 34e423924e06..374e5aae4e7e 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
@@ -76,8 +76,7 @@  static int ufs_bsg_exec_advanced_rpmb_req(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct bsg_job *j
 	int ret;
 	int data_len;
 
-	if (hba->ufs_version < ufshci_version(4, 0) || !hba->dev_info.b_advanced_rpmb_en ||
-	    !(hba->capabilities & MASK_EHSLUTRD_SUPPORTED))
+	if (hba->ufs_version < ufshci_version(4, 0) || !hba->dev_info.b_advanced_rpmb_en)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (rpmb_request->ehs_req.length != 2 || rpmb_request->ehs_req.ehs_type != 1)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
index 8b5ee1a7d454..7f965ac18ee8 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
@@ -7240,7 +7240,15 @@  int ufshcd_advanced_rpmb_req_handler(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct utp_upiu_req *r
 	/* Advanced RPMB starts from UFS 4.0, so its command type is UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE */
 	lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE;
 
-	ufshcd_prepare_req_desc_hdr(lrbp, &upiu_flags, dir, 2);
+	/*
+	 * According to UFSHCI 4.0 specification page 24, if EHSLUTRDS is 0, host controller takes
+	 * EHS length from CMD UPIU, and SW driver use EHS Length field in CMD UPIU. if it is 1,
+	 * HW controller takes EHS length from UTRD.
+	 */
+	if (hba->capabilities & MASK_EHSLUTRD_SUPPORTED)
+		ufshcd_prepare_req_desc_hdr(lrbp, &upiu_flags, dir, 2);
+	else
+		ufshcd_prepare_req_desc_hdr(lrbp, &upiu_flags, dir, 0);
 
 	/* update the task tag and LUN in the request upiu */
 	req_upiu->header.flags = upiu_flags;