| Message ID | 20230814215457.4075025-18-bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Enable UFS on DragonBoard845c | expand |
On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid, > drop him from UFS Maintainer list. > > Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively > on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as > the new UFS maintainer. > > I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the > recent past. > > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org> I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them.
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 04:01, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org> wrote: > > On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > > Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid, > > drop him from UFS Maintainer list. > > > > Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively > > on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as > > the new UFS maintainer. > > > > I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the > > recent past. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org> > > I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them. Ok, well I haven't seen any reply to my earlier UFS fix related emails from TI, so I thought maybe no one is actively looking into this area. But I would love to hear from TI on the same.. Anyways since I will be working on the Qualcomm UFS glue layer going forward, I can propose to either be a UFS maintainer or a reviewer for now to make sure that the subsystem patches are reviewed and tested . Thanks, Bhupesh
On 8/15/23 19:48, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 04:01, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org> wrote: >> >> On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: >>> Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid, >>> drop him from UFS Maintainer list. >>> >>> Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively >>> on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as >>> the new UFS maintainer. >>> >>> I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the >>> recent past. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org> >> >> I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them. > > Ok, well I haven't seen any reply to my earlier UFS fix related emails > from TI, so I thought maybe no one is actively looking into this area. > But I would love to hear from TI on the same.. This is why I CCed Vignesh and Nishanth , coordinate with them. > Anyways since I will be working on the Qualcomm UFS glue layer going > forward, I can propose to either be a UFS maintainer or a reviewer for > now to make sure that the subsystem patches are reviewed and tested .
Hi Bhupesh, Marek On 16/08/23 02:16, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 8/15/23 19:48, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: >> On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 04:01, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: >>>> Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid, >>>> drop him from UFS Maintainer list. >>>> >>>> Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively >>>> on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as >>>> the new UFS maintainer. >>>> >>>> I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the >>>> recent past. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org> >>> >>> I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them. >> >> Ok, well I haven't seen any reply to my earlier UFS fix related emails >> from TI, so I thought maybe no one is actively looking into this area. >> But I would love to hear from TI on the same.. > > This is why I CCed Vignesh and Nishanth , coordinate with them. > >> Anyways since I will be working on the Qualcomm UFS glue layer going >> forward, I can propose to either be a UFS maintainer or a reviewer for >> now to make sure that the subsystem patches are reviewed and tested . > > I'd like to propose myself as a UFS maintainer along with Bhupesh, can help with reviewing and testing starting with these patches. If all seems okay, I can send a MAINTAINERS patch adding both Bhupesh and me.
Hi Neha, On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 10:26, Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com> wrote: > > Hi Bhupesh, Marek > > On 16/08/23 02:16, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On 8/15/23 19:48, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > >> On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 04:01, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > >>>> Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid, > >>>> drop him from UFS Maintainer list. > >>>> > >>>> Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively > >>>> on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as > >>>> the new UFS maintainer. > >>>> > >>>> I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the > >>>> recent past. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org> > >>> > >>> I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them. > >> > >> Ok, well I haven't seen any reply to my earlier UFS fix related emails > >> from TI, so I thought maybe no one is actively looking into this area. > >> But I would love to hear from TI on the same.. > > > > This is why I CCed Vignesh and Nishanth , coordinate with them. > > > >> Anyways since I will be working on the Qualcomm UFS glue layer going > >> forward, I can propose to either be a UFS maintainer or a reviewer for > >> now to make sure that the subsystem patches are reviewed and tested . > > > > > > I'd like to propose myself as a UFS maintainer along with Bhupesh, can help with > reviewing and testing starting with these patches. If all seems okay, I can send > a MAINTAINERS patch adding both Bhupesh and me. Thanks for stepping in. The above proposal looks good to me - I can help to-maintain this u-boot framework and work closely with you for testing / reviewing patches related to this area. Many thanks to Nishanth as well for his prompt response when I ping'ed him regarding this :) Thanks, Bhupesh
On 15:40-20230817, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > Hi Neha, > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 10:26, Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Bhupesh, Marek > > > > On 16/08/23 02:16, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > On 8/15/23 19:48, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > > >> On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 04:01, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > > >>>> Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid, > > >>>> drop him from UFS Maintainer list. > > >>>> > > >>>> Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively > > >>>> on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as > > >>>> the new UFS maintainer. > > >>>> > > >>>> I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the > > >>>> recent past. > > >>>> > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org> > > >>> > > >>> I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them. > > >> > > >> Ok, well I haven't seen any reply to my earlier UFS fix related emails > > >> from TI, so I thought maybe no one is actively looking into this area. > > >> But I would love to hear from TI on the same.. > > > > > > This is why I CCed Vignesh and Nishanth , coordinate with them. > > > > > >> Anyways since I will be working on the Qualcomm UFS glue layer going > > >> forward, I can propose to either be a UFS maintainer or a reviewer for > > >> now to make sure that the subsystem patches are reviewed and tested . > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to propose myself as a UFS maintainer along with Bhupesh, can help with > > reviewing and testing starting with these patches. If all seems okay, I can send > > a MAINTAINERS patch adding both Bhupesh and me. > > Thanks for stepping in. The above proposal looks good to me - I can > help to-maintain this u-boot framework and work closely with you for > testing / reviewing patches related to this area. > > Many thanks to Nishanth as well for his prompt response when I ping'ed > him regarding this :) Thank you folks for volunteering and keeping our community vibrant.
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 17:04, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote: > > On 15:40-20230817, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > > Hi Neha, > > > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 10:26, Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Bhupesh, Marek > > > > > > On 16/08/23 02:16, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > On 8/15/23 19:48, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 04:01, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > > > >>>> Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid, > > > >>>> drop him from UFS Maintainer list. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively > > > >>>> on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as > > > >>>> the new UFS maintainer. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the > > > >>>> recent past. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org> > > > >>> > > > >>> I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them. > > > >> > > > >> Ok, well I haven't seen any reply to my earlier UFS fix related emails > > > >> from TI, so I thought maybe no one is actively looking into this area. > > > >> But I would love to hear from TI on the same.. > > > > > > > > This is why I CCed Vignesh and Nishanth , coordinate with them. > > > > > > > >> Anyways since I will be working on the Qualcomm UFS glue layer going > > > >> forward, I can propose to either be a UFS maintainer or a reviewer for > > > >> now to make sure that the subsystem patches are reviewed and tested . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to propose myself as a UFS maintainer along with Bhupesh, can help with > > > reviewing and testing starting with these patches. If all seems okay, I can send > > > a MAINTAINERS patch adding both Bhupesh and me. > > > > Thanks for stepping in. The above proposal looks good to me - I can > > help to-maintain this u-boot framework and work closely with you for > > testing / reviewing patches related to this area. > > > > Many thanks to Nishanth as well for his prompt response when I ping'ed > > him regarding this :) > > Thank you folks for volunteering and keeping our community vibrant. Sure, I will send a v2 to reflect the same shortly. Thanks, Bhupesh
Hi all, On 17/08/23 17:03, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 15:40-20230817, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: >> Hi Neha, >> >> On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 10:26, Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Bhupesh, Marek >>> >>> On 16/08/23 02:16, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>> On 8/15/23 19:48, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 04:01, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: >>>>>>> Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid, >>>>>>> drop him from UFS Maintainer list. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively >>>>>>> on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as >>>>>>> the new UFS maintainer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the >>>>>>> recent past. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org> >>>>>> >>>>>> I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them. >>>>> >>>>> Ok, well I haven't seen any reply to my earlier UFS fix related emails >>>>> from TI, so I thought maybe no one is actively looking into this area. >>>>> But I would love to hear from TI on the same.. >>>> >>>> This is why I CCed Vignesh and Nishanth , coordinate with them. >>>> >>>>> Anyways since I will be working on the Qualcomm UFS glue layer going >>>>> forward, I can propose to either be a UFS maintainer or a reviewer for >>>>> now to make sure that the subsystem patches are reviewed and tested . >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I'd like to propose myself as a UFS maintainer along with Bhupesh, can help with >>> reviewing and testing starting with these patches. If all seems okay, I can send >>> a MAINTAINERS patch adding both Bhupesh and me. >> >> Thanks for stepping in. The above proposal looks good to me - I can >> help to-maintain this u-boot framework and work closely with you for >> testing / reviewing patches related to this area. >> >> Many thanks to Nishanth as well for his prompt response when I ping'ed >> him regarding this :) > > Thank you folks for volunteering and keeping our community vibrant. > Have posted a patch to update the same here: https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20230817120914.144240-1-n-francis@ti.com/
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 17:42, Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > On 17/08/23 17:03, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > On 15:40-20230817, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > >> Hi Neha, > >> > >> On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 10:26, Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Bhupesh, Marek > >>> > >>> On 16/08/23 02:16, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>>> On 8/15/23 19:48, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 04:01, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > >>>>>>> Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid, > >>>>>>> drop him from UFS Maintainer list. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively > >>>>>>> on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as > >>>>>>> the new UFS maintainer. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the > >>>>>>> recent past. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them. > >>>>> > >>>>> Ok, well I haven't seen any reply to my earlier UFS fix related emails > >>>>> from TI, so I thought maybe no one is actively looking into this area. > >>>>> But I would love to hear from TI on the same.. > >>>> > >>>> This is why I CCed Vignesh and Nishanth , coordinate with them. > >>>> > >>>>> Anyways since I will be working on the Qualcomm UFS glue layer going > >>>>> forward, I can propose to either be a UFS maintainer or a reviewer for > >>>>> now to make sure that the subsystem patches are reviewed and tested . > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> I'd like to propose myself as a UFS maintainer along with Bhupesh, can help with > >>> reviewing and testing starting with these patches. If all seems okay, I can send > >>> a MAINTAINERS patch adding both Bhupesh and me. > >> > >> Thanks for stepping in. The above proposal looks good to me - I can > >> help to-maintain this u-boot framework and work closely with you for > >> testing / reviewing patches related to this area. > >> > >> Many thanks to Nishanth as well for his prompt response when I ping'ed > >> him regarding this :) > > > > Thank you folks for volunteering and keeping our community vibrant. > > > > Have posted a patch to update the same here: > https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20230817120914.144240-1-n-francis@ti.com/ Many thanks Neha - I will then drop this from my v2. Thanks, Bhupesh
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 2db052961b..3b2acb5167 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -1584,7 +1584,7 @@ T: git https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-ubi.git F: drivers/mtd/ubi/ UFS -M: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com> +M: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org> S: Maintained F: drivers/ufs/
Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid, drop him from UFS Maintainer list. Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as the new UFS maintainer. I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the recent past. Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org> --- MAINTAINERS | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)