diff mbox series

[17/17] MAINTAINERS: Update UFS maintainer

Message ID 20230814215457.4075025-18-bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org
State New
Headers show
Series Enable UFS on DragonBoard845c | expand

Commit Message

Bhupesh Sharma Aug. 14, 2023, 9:54 p.m. UTC
Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid,
drop him from UFS Maintainer list.

Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively
on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as
the new UFS maintainer.

I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the
recent past.

Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Marek Vasut Aug. 14, 2023, 10:31 p.m. UTC | #1
On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid,
> drop him from UFS Maintainer list.
> 
> Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively
> on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as
> the new UFS maintainer.
> 
> I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the
> recent past.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>

I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them.
Bhupesh Sharma Aug. 15, 2023, 5:48 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 04:01, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org> wrote:
>
> On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> > Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid,
> > drop him from UFS Maintainer list.
> >
> > Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively
> > on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as
> > the new UFS maintainer.
> >
> > I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the
> > recent past.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
>
> I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them.

Ok, well I haven't seen any reply to my earlier UFS fix related emails
from TI, so I thought maybe no one is actively looking into this area.
But I would love to hear from TI on the same..

Anyways since I will be working on the Qualcomm UFS glue layer going
forward, I can propose to either be a UFS maintainer or a reviewer for
now to make sure that the subsystem patches are reviewed and tested .

Thanks,
Bhupesh
Marek Vasut Aug. 15, 2023, 8:46 p.m. UTC | #3
On 8/15/23 19:48, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 04:01, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>>> Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid,
>>> drop him from UFS Maintainer list.
>>>
>>> Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively
>>> on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as
>>> the new UFS maintainer.
>>>
>>> I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the
>>> recent past.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
>>
>> I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them.
> 
> Ok, well I haven't seen any reply to my earlier UFS fix related emails
> from TI, so I thought maybe no one is actively looking into this area.
> But I would love to hear from TI on the same..

This is why I CCed Vignesh and Nishanth , coordinate with them.

> Anyways since I will be working on the Qualcomm UFS glue layer going
> forward, I can propose to either be a UFS maintainer or a reviewer for
> now to make sure that the subsystem patches are reviewed and tested .
Neha Malcom Francis Aug. 17, 2023, 4:56 a.m. UTC | #4
Hi Bhupesh, Marek

On 16/08/23 02:16, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 8/15/23 19:48, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 04:01, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>>>> Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid,
>>>> drop him from UFS Maintainer list.
>>>>
>>>> Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively
>>>> on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as
>>>> the new UFS maintainer.
>>>>
>>>> I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the
>>>> recent past.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them.
>>
>> Ok, well I haven't seen any reply to my earlier UFS fix related emails
>> from TI, so I thought maybe no one is actively looking into this area.
>> But I would love to hear from TI on the same..
> 
> This is why I CCed Vignesh and Nishanth , coordinate with them.
> 
>> Anyways since I will be working on the Qualcomm UFS glue layer going
>> forward, I can propose to either be a UFS maintainer or a reviewer for
>> now to make sure that the subsystem patches are reviewed and tested .
> 
> 

I'd like to propose myself as a UFS maintainer along with Bhupesh, can help with 
reviewing and testing starting with these patches. If all seems okay, I can send 
a MAINTAINERS patch adding both Bhupesh and me.
Bhupesh Sharma Aug. 17, 2023, 10:10 a.m. UTC | #5
Hi Neha,

On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 10:26, Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bhupesh, Marek
>
> On 16/08/23 02:16, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On 8/15/23 19:48, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> >> On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 04:01, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> >>>> Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid,
> >>>> drop him from UFS Maintainer list.
> >>>>
> >>>> Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively
> >>>> on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as
> >>>> the new UFS maintainer.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the
> >>>> recent past.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
> >>>
> >>> I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them.
> >>
> >> Ok, well I haven't seen any reply to my earlier UFS fix related emails
> >> from TI, so I thought maybe no one is actively looking into this area.
> >> But I would love to hear from TI on the same..
> >
> > This is why I CCed Vignesh and Nishanth , coordinate with them.
> >
> >> Anyways since I will be working on the Qualcomm UFS glue layer going
> >> forward, I can propose to either be a UFS maintainer or a reviewer for
> >> now to make sure that the subsystem patches are reviewed and tested .
> >
> >
>
> I'd like to propose myself as a UFS maintainer along with Bhupesh, can help with
> reviewing and testing starting with these patches. If all seems okay, I can send
> a MAINTAINERS patch adding both Bhupesh and me.

Thanks for stepping in. The above proposal looks good to me - I can
help to-maintain this u-boot framework and work closely with you for
testing / reviewing patches related to  this area.

Many thanks to Nishanth as well for his prompt response when I ping'ed
him regarding this :)

Thanks,
Bhupesh
Nishanth Menon Aug. 17, 2023, 11:33 a.m. UTC | #6
On 15:40-20230817, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> Hi Neha,
> 
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 10:26, Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bhupesh, Marek
> >
> > On 16/08/23 02:16, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On 8/15/23 19:48, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 04:01, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> > >>>> Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid,
> > >>>> drop him from UFS Maintainer list.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively
> > >>>> on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as
> > >>>> the new UFS maintainer.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the
> > >>>> recent past.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
> > >>>
> > >>> I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them.
> > >>
> > >> Ok, well I haven't seen any reply to my earlier UFS fix related emails
> > >> from TI, so I thought maybe no one is actively looking into this area.
> > >> But I would love to hear from TI on the same..
> > >
> > > This is why I CCed Vignesh and Nishanth , coordinate with them.
> > >
> > >> Anyways since I will be working on the Qualcomm UFS glue layer going
> > >> forward, I can propose to either be a UFS maintainer or a reviewer for
> > >> now to make sure that the subsystem patches are reviewed and tested .
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I'd like to propose myself as a UFS maintainer along with Bhupesh, can help with
> > reviewing and testing starting with these patches. If all seems okay, I can send
> > a MAINTAINERS patch adding both Bhupesh and me.
> 
> Thanks for stepping in. The above proposal looks good to me - I can
> help to-maintain this u-boot framework and work closely with you for
> testing / reviewing patches related to  this area.
> 
> Many thanks to Nishanth as well for his prompt response when I ping'ed
> him regarding this :)

Thank you folks for volunteering and keeping our community vibrant.
Bhupesh Sharma Aug. 17, 2023, 12:11 p.m. UTC | #7
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 17:04, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
>
> On 15:40-20230817, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> > Hi Neha,
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 10:26, Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Bhupesh, Marek
> > >
> > > On 16/08/23 02:16, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > On 8/15/23 19:48, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> > > >> On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 04:01, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> > > >>>> Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid,
> > > >>>> drop him from UFS Maintainer list.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively
> > > >>>> on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as
> > > >>>> the new UFS maintainer.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the
> > > >>>> recent past.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them.
> > > >>
> > > >> Ok, well I haven't seen any reply to my earlier UFS fix related emails
> > > >> from TI, so I thought maybe no one is actively looking into this area.
> > > >> But I would love to hear from TI on the same..
> > > >
> > > > This is why I CCed Vignesh and Nishanth , coordinate with them.
> > > >
> > > >> Anyways since I will be working on the Qualcomm UFS glue layer going
> > > >> forward, I can propose to either be a UFS maintainer or a reviewer for
> > > >> now to make sure that the subsystem patches are reviewed and tested .
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'd like to propose myself as a UFS maintainer along with Bhupesh, can help with
> > > reviewing and testing starting with these patches. If all seems okay, I can send
> > > a MAINTAINERS patch adding both Bhupesh and me.
> >
> > Thanks for stepping in. The above proposal looks good to me - I can
> > help to-maintain this u-boot framework and work closely with you for
> > testing / reviewing patches related to  this area.
> >
> > Many thanks to Nishanth as well for his prompt response when I ping'ed
> > him regarding this :)
>
> Thank you folks for volunteering and keeping our community vibrant.

Sure, I will send a v2 to reflect the same shortly.

Thanks,
Bhupesh
Neha Malcom Francis Aug. 17, 2023, 12:12 p.m. UTC | #8
Hi all,

On 17/08/23 17:03, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 15:40-20230817, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>> Hi Neha,
>>
>> On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 10:26, Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Bhupesh, Marek
>>>
>>> On 16/08/23 02:16, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> On 8/15/23 19:48, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 04:01, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>>>>>>> Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid,
>>>>>>> drop him from UFS Maintainer list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively
>>>>>>> on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as
>>>>>>> the new UFS maintainer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the
>>>>>>> recent past.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, well I haven't seen any reply to my earlier UFS fix related emails
>>>>> from TI, so I thought maybe no one is actively looking into this area.
>>>>> But I would love to hear from TI on the same..
>>>>
>>>> This is why I CCed Vignesh and Nishanth , coordinate with them.
>>>>
>>>>> Anyways since I will be working on the Qualcomm UFS glue layer going
>>>>> forward, I can propose to either be a UFS maintainer or a reviewer for
>>>>> now to make sure that the subsystem patches are reviewed and tested .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'd like to propose myself as a UFS maintainer along with Bhupesh, can help with
>>> reviewing and testing starting with these patches. If all seems okay, I can send
>>> a MAINTAINERS patch adding both Bhupesh and me.
>>
>> Thanks for stepping in. The above proposal looks good to me - I can
>> help to-maintain this u-boot framework and work closely with you for
>> testing / reviewing patches related to  this area.
>>
>> Many thanks to Nishanth as well for his prompt response when I ping'ed
>> him regarding this :)
> 
> Thank you folks for volunteering and keeping our community vibrant.
> 

Have posted a patch to update the same here:
https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20230817120914.144240-1-n-francis@ti.com/
Bhupesh Sharma Aug. 17, 2023, 12:13 p.m. UTC | #9
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 17:42, Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On 17/08/23 17:03, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 15:40-20230817, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> >> Hi Neha,
> >>
> >> On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 10:26, Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Bhupesh, Marek
> >>>
> >>> On 16/08/23 02:16, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>> On 8/15/23 19:48, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 04:01, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> >>>>>>> Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid,
> >>>>>>> drop him from UFS Maintainer list.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively
> >>>>>>> on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as
> >>>>>>> the new UFS maintainer.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the
> >>>>>>> recent past.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ok, well I haven't seen any reply to my earlier UFS fix related emails
> >>>>> from TI, so I thought maybe no one is actively looking into this area.
> >>>>> But I would love to hear from TI on the same..
> >>>>
> >>>> This is why I CCed Vignesh and Nishanth , coordinate with them.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Anyways since I will be working on the Qualcomm UFS glue layer going
> >>>>> forward, I can propose to either be a UFS maintainer or a reviewer for
> >>>>> now to make sure that the subsystem patches are reviewed and tested .
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to propose myself as a UFS maintainer along with Bhupesh, can help with
> >>> reviewing and testing starting with these patches. If all seems okay, I can send
> >>> a MAINTAINERS patch adding both Bhupesh and me.
> >>
> >> Thanks for stepping in. The above proposal looks good to me - I can
> >> help to-maintain this u-boot framework and work closely with you for
> >> testing / reviewing patches related to  this area.
> >>
> >> Many thanks to Nishanth as well for his prompt response when I ping'ed
> >> him regarding this :)
> >
> > Thank you folks for volunteering and keeping our community vibrant.
> >
>
> Have posted a patch to update the same here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20230817120914.144240-1-n-francis@ti.com/

Many thanks Neha - I will then drop this from my v2.

Thanks,
Bhupesh
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 2db052961b..3b2acb5167 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -1584,7 +1584,7 @@  T:	git https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-ubi.git
 F:	drivers/mtd/ubi/
 
 UFS
-M:	Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>
+M:	Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
 S:	Maintained
 F:	drivers/ufs/