Message ID | 20230906190224.583577-4-jim.cromie@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | None | expand |
Hi Jim On 9/6/2023 12:02 PM, Jim Cromie wrote: > By at least strong convention, a print-buffer's trailing newline says > "message complete, send it". The exception (no TNL, followed by a call > to pr_cont) proves the general rule. > > Most DRM.debug calls already comport with this: 207 DRM_DEV_DEBUG, > 1288 drm_dbg. Clean up the remainders, in maintainer sized chunks. May I know what 207, 1288 mean here? Is it the number of callers already having \n? If so, this might be a big confusing as its subjective to the code-base you are referring to. So I will just stop with "Most DRM.debug calls already comport with this". > > No functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fb.c | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > The change itself LGTM, hence Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fb.c index e3f61c39df69..88bb5fa23bb1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fb.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fb.c @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ int msm_framebuffer_prepare(struct drm_framebuffer *fb, for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { ret = msm_gem_get_and_pin_iova(fb->obj[i], aspace, &msm_fb->iova[i]); - drm_dbg_state(fb->dev, "FB[%u]: iova[%d]: %08llx (%d)", + drm_dbg_state(fb->dev, "FB[%u]: iova[%d]: %08llx (%d)\n", fb->base.id, i, msm_fb->iova[i], ret); if (ret) return ret; @@ -176,9 +176,9 @@ static struct drm_framebuffer *msm_framebuffer_init(struct drm_device *dev, const struct msm_format *format; int ret, i, n; - drm_dbg_state(dev, "create framebuffer: mode_cmd=%p (%dx%d@%4.4s)", - mode_cmd, mode_cmd->width, mode_cmd->height, - (char *)&mode_cmd->pixel_format); + drm_dbg_state(dev, "create framebuffer: mode_cmd=%p (%dx%d@%4.4s)\n", + mode_cmd, mode_cmd->width, mode_cmd->height, + (char *)&mode_cmd->pixel_format); n = info->num_planes; format = kms->funcs->get_format(kms, mode_cmd->pixel_format, @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static struct drm_framebuffer *msm_framebuffer_init(struct drm_device *dev, refcount_set(&msm_fb->dirtyfb, 1); - drm_dbg_state(dev, "create: FB ID: %d (%p)", fb->base.id, fb); + drm_dbg_state(dev, "create: FB ID: %d (%p)\n", fb->base.id, fb); return fb;
By at least strong convention, a print-buffer's trailing newline says "message complete, send it". The exception (no TNL, followed by a call to pr_cont) proves the general rule. Most DRM.debug calls already comport with this: 207 DRM_DEV_DEBUG, 1288 drm_dbg. Clean up the remainders, in maintainer sized chunks. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_fb.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)