| Message ID | 20231007072818.58951-2-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v9,1/2] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events | expand |
Hi Shuai, On 07/10/2023 08:28, Shuai Xue wrote: > There are two major types of uncorrected recoverable (UCR) errors : Is UCR a well known x86 acronym? It's best to just spell this out each time, there is enough jargon in this area already. > > - Action Required (AR): The error is detected and the processor already > consumes the memory. OS requires to take action (for example, offline > failure page/kill failure thread) to recover this uncorrectable error. > > - Action Optional (AO): The error is detected out of processor execution > context. Some data in the memory are corrupted. But the data have not > been consumed. OS is optional to take action to recover this > uncorrectable error. As elsewhere, please don't think of errors as 'action required', this is how things get reported to user-space. Action-required for one thread may be action-optional for another that has the same page mapped - its really not a property of the error. It would be better to describe this as synchronous and asynchronous, or in-band and out-of-band. > The essential difference between AR and AO errors is that AR is a > synchronous event, while AO is an asynchronous event. The hardware will > signal a synchronous exception (Machine Check Exception on X86 and > Synchronous External Abort on Arm64) when an error is detected and the > memory access has been architecturally executed. > When APEI firmware first is enabled, a platform may describe one error > source for the handling of synchronous errors (e.g. MCE or SEA notification > ), or for handling asynchronous errors (e.g. SCI or External Interrupt > notification). In other words, we can distinguish synchronous errors by > APEI notification. For AR errors, kernel will kill current process > accessing the poisoned page by sending SIGBUS with BUS_MCEERR_AR. In > addition, for AO errors, kernel will notify the process who owns the > poisoned page by sending SIGBUS with BUS_MCEERR_AO in early kill mode. > However, the GHES driver always sets mf_flags to 0 so that all UCR errors > are handled as AO errors in memory failure. To make this easier to read: UCR and AR -> synchronous AO -> asynchronous > To this end, set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous > events. > Fixes: ba61ca4aab47 ("ACPI, APEI, GHES: Add hardware memory error recovery support")' Erm, this predates arm64 support, and what you have here doesn't change the behaviour on x86. You can blame 7f17b4a121d0d50 ("ACPI: APEI: Kick the memory_failure() queue for synchronous errors"), which should have covered this. > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c > index ef59d6ea16da..88178aa6222d 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c > @@ -101,6 +101,20 @@ static inline bool is_hest_type_generic_v2(struct ghes *ghes) > return ghes->generic->header.type == ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR_V2; > } > > +/* > + * A platform may describe one error source for the handling of synchronous > + * errors (e.g. MCE or SEA), or for handling asynchronous errors (e.g. SCI > + * or External Interrupt). On x86, the HEST notifications are always > + * asynchronous, so only SEA on ARM is delivered as a synchronous > + * notification. > + */ > +static inline bool is_hest_sync_notify(struct ghes *ghes) > +{ > + u8 notify_type = ghes->generic->notify.type; > + > + return notify_type == ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA; > +} and as you had in earlier versions, sometimes SDEI. SDEI can report by synchronous and asynchronous errors, I wouldn't too surprised if the hardware NMI can be used for the same. It would be good to chase up having a hint of this in the CPER records and pass that in here as a hint. Unfortunately, its not safe to assume either way for SDEI. Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Thanks, James
On 2023/12/1 01:39, James Morse wrote: > Hi Shuai, > > On 07/10/2023 08:28, Shuai Xue wrote: >> There are two major types of uncorrected recoverable (UCR) errors : > > Is UCR a well known x86 acronym? It's best to just spell this out each time, > there is enough jargon in this area already. Quite agreed, will replace the commit log with "uncorrected recoverable error". > >> >> - Action Required (AR): The error is detected and the processor already >> consumes the memory. OS requires to take action (for example, offline >> failure page/kill failure thread) to recover this uncorrectable error. >> >> - Action Optional (AO): The error is detected out of processor execution >> context. Some data in the memory are corrupted. But the data have not >> been consumed. OS is optional to take action to recover this >> uncorrectable error. > > As elsewhere, please don't think of errors as 'action required', this is how > things get reported to user-space. Action-required for one thread may be > action-optional for another that has the same page mapped - its really not a > property of the error. > It would be better to describe this as synchronous and asynchronous, or in-band > and out-of-band. Thank you for explanation. I will change to "synchronous and asynchronous". > > >> The essential difference between AR and AO errors is that AR is a >> synchronous event, while AO is an asynchronous event. The hardware will >> signal a synchronous exception (Machine Check Exception on X86 and >> Synchronous External Abort on Arm64) when an error is detected and the >> memory access has been architecturally executed. > >> When APEI firmware first is enabled, a platform may describe one error >> source for the handling of synchronous errors (e.g. MCE or SEA notification >> ), or for handling asynchronous errors (e.g. SCI or External Interrupt >> notification). In other words, we can distinguish synchronous errors by >> APEI notification. For AR errors, kernel will kill current process >> accessing the poisoned page by sending SIGBUS with BUS_MCEERR_AR. In >> addition, for AO errors, kernel will notify the process who owns the >> poisoned page by sending SIGBUS with BUS_MCEERR_AO in early kill mode. >> However, the GHES driver always sets mf_flags to 0 so that all UCR errors >> are handled as AO errors in memory failure. > > To make this easier to read: > UCR and AR -> synchronous > AO -> asynchronous > Will do that. > >> To this end, set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous >> events. > >> Fixes: ba61ca4aab47 ("ACPI, APEI, GHES: Add hardware memory error recovery support")' > > Erm, this predates arm64 support, and what you have here doesn't change the behaviour on x86. > > You can blame 7f17b4a121d0d50 ("ACPI: APEI: Kick the memory_failure() queue for > synchronous errors"), which should have covered this. Do you mean just drop the "Fixes" tags? > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c >> index ef59d6ea16da..88178aa6222d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c >> @@ -101,6 +101,20 @@ static inline bool is_hest_type_generic_v2(struct ghes *ghes) >> return ghes->generic->header.type == ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR_V2; >> } >> >> +/* >> + * A platform may describe one error source for the handling of synchronous >> + * errors (e.g. MCE or SEA), or for handling asynchronous errors (e.g. SCI >> + * or External Interrupt). On x86, the HEST notifications are always >> + * asynchronous, so only SEA on ARM is delivered as a synchronous >> + * notification. >> + */ >> +static inline bool is_hest_sync_notify(struct ghes *ghes) >> +{ >> + u8 notify_type = ghes->generic->notify.type; >> + >> + return notify_type == ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA; >> +} > > and as you had in earlier versions, sometimes SDEI. > SDEI can report by synchronous and asynchronous errors, I wouldn't too surprised if the > hardware NMI can be used for the same. It would be good to chase up having a hint of this > in the CPER records and pass that in here as a hint.> > Unfortunately, its not safe to assume either way for SDEI. For SDEI notification, only x0-x17 has preserved by firmware. As SDEI TRM[1] describes "the dispatcher can simulate an exception-like entry into the client, **with the client providing an additional asynchronous entry point similar to an interrupt entry point**". The client (kernel) lacks complete synchronous context, e.g. system register (ELR, ESR, etc). So I think SDEI notification should not be used for asynchronous error, can you help to confirm this? For NMI notification, as far as I know, AArch64 (aka arm64 in the Linux tree) does not provide architected NMIs. > > Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> > Thank you for valuable comments. Best Regards, Shuai [1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0054/latest/
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c index ef59d6ea16da..88178aa6222d 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c @@ -101,6 +101,20 @@ static inline bool is_hest_type_generic_v2(struct ghes *ghes) return ghes->generic->header.type == ACPI_HEST_TYPE_GENERIC_ERROR_V2; } +/* + * A platform may describe one error source for the handling of synchronous + * errors (e.g. MCE or SEA), or for handling asynchronous errors (e.g. SCI + * or External Interrupt). On x86, the HEST notifications are always + * asynchronous, so only SEA on ARM is delivered as a synchronous + * notification. + */ +static inline bool is_hest_sync_notify(struct ghes *ghes) +{ + u8 notify_type = ghes->generic->notify.type; + + return notify_type == ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA; +} + /* * This driver isn't really modular, however for the time being, * continuing to use module_param is the easiest way to remain @@ -475,7 +489,7 @@ static bool ghes_do_memory_failure(u64 physical_addr, int flags) } static bool ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, - int sev) + int sev, bool sync) { int flags = -1; int sec_sev = ghes_severity(gdata->error_severity); @@ -489,7 +503,7 @@ static bool ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, (gdata->flags & CPER_SEC_ERROR_THRESHOLD_EXCEEDED)) flags = MF_SOFT_OFFLINE; if (sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE && sec_sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE) - flags = 0; + flags = sync ? MF_ACTION_REQUIRED : 0; if (flags != -1) return ghes_do_memory_failure(mem_err->physical_addr, flags); @@ -497,9 +511,11 @@ static bool ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, return false; } -static bool ghes_handle_arm_hw_error(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int sev) +static bool ghes_handle_arm_hw_error(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, + int sev, bool sync) { struct cper_sec_proc_arm *err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata); + int flags = sync ? MF_ACTION_REQUIRED : 0; bool queued = false; int sec_sev, i; char *p; @@ -524,7 +540,7 @@ static bool ghes_handle_arm_hw_error(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int s * and don't filter out 'corrected' error here. */ if (is_cache && has_pa) { - queued = ghes_do_memory_failure(err_info->physical_fault_addr, 0); + queued = ghes_do_memory_failure(err_info->physical_fault_addr, flags); p += err_info->length; continue; } @@ -645,6 +661,7 @@ static bool ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes, const guid_t *fru_id = &guid_null; char *fru_text = ""; bool queued = false; + bool sync = is_hest_sync_notify(ghes); sev = ghes_severity(estatus->error_severity); apei_estatus_for_each_section(estatus, gdata) { @@ -662,13 +679,13 @@ static bool ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes, atomic_notifier_call_chain(&ghes_report_chain, sev, mem_err); arch_apei_report_mem_error(sev, mem_err); - queued = ghes_handle_memory_failure(gdata, sev); + queued = ghes_handle_memory_failure(gdata, sev, sync); } else if (guid_equal(sec_type, &CPER_SEC_PCIE)) { ghes_handle_aer(gdata); } else if (guid_equal(sec_type, &CPER_SEC_PROC_ARM)) { - queued = ghes_handle_arm_hw_error(gdata, sev); + queued = ghes_handle_arm_hw_error(gdata, sev, sync); } else { void *err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
There are two major types of uncorrected recoverable (UCR) errors : - Action Required (AR): The error is detected and the processor already consumes the memory. OS requires to take action (for example, offline failure page/kill failure thread) to recover this uncorrectable error. - Action Optional (AO): The error is detected out of processor execution context. Some data in the memory are corrupted. But the data have not been consumed. OS is optional to take action to recover this uncorrectable error. The essential difference between AR and AO errors is that AR is a synchronous event, while AO is an asynchronous event. The hardware will signal a synchronous exception (Machine Check Exception on X86 and Synchronous External Abort on Arm64) when an error is detected and the memory access has been architecturally executed. When APEI firmware first is enabled, a platform may describe one error source for the handling of synchronous errors (e.g. MCE or SEA notification ), or for handling asynchronous errors (e.g. SCI or External Interrupt notification). In other words, we can distinguish synchronous errors by APEI notification. For AR errors, kernel will kill current process accessing the poisoned page by sending SIGBUS with BUS_MCEERR_AR. In addition, for AO errors, kernel will notify the process who owns the poisoned page by sending SIGBUS with BUS_MCEERR_AO in early kill mode. However, the GHES driver always sets mf_flags to 0 so that all UCR errors are handled as AO errors in memory failure. To this end, set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events. Fixes: ba61ca4aab47 ("ACPI, APEI, GHES: Add hardware memory error recovery support")' Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> Tested-by: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> --- drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)