@@ -165,7 +165,10 @@ static int rtd_pinctrl_set_one_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pcdev,
return 0;
if (!mux->functions) {
- dev_err(pcdev->dev, "No functions available for pin %s\n", mux->name);
+ if (!mux->name)
+ dev_err(pcdev->dev, "NULL pin has no functions\n");
+ else
+ dev_err(pcdev->dev, "No functions available for pin %s\n", mux->name);
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
@@ -177,6 +180,11 @@ static int rtd_pinctrl_set_one_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pcdev,
return ret;
}
+ if (!mux->name) {
+ dev_err(pcdev->dev, "NULL pin provided for function %s\n", func_name);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
dev_err(pcdev->dev, "No function %s available for pin %s\n", func_name, mux->name);
return -EINVAL;
Just inspecting the code doesn't convince me that this is a real issue, but the tools complain that it is so I will just handle it. Cc: Tzuyi Chang <tychang@realtek.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309270234.aJGlDE0P-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> --- drivers/pinctrl/realtek/pinctrl-rtd.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)