Message ID | 20231031120307.1600689-3-quic_mdalam@quicinc.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Add QPIC SPI NAND driver support | expand |
On 31/10/2023 13:03, Md Sadre Alam wrote: > Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com> > Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <quic_srichara@quicinc.com> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi > index 5f83ee42a719..b44acb1fac74 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi > @@ -336,6 +336,11 @@ sdhc_1: mmc@7804000 { > status = "disabled"; > }; > > + bch: qpic_ecc { > + compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-ecc"; NAK. There are so many wrong things with it... Let's start with missing checkpatch. Then with unndeeded label. Then with not allowed underscores in node names. Finally: > + status = "ok"; Drop. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 10/31/2023 8:53 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 31.10.2023 13:03, Md Sadre Alam wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com> >> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <quic_srichara@quicinc.com> >> --- > Hello, > > you're missing: > > - dt-bindings (make dtbs_check is unhappy) > - a commit message > - Co-developed-by for Sricharan > > status should read "okay" instead, but in this case it's unnecessary > as you're defining the node and lack of the status property also means > that device is enabled > > however > > this ECC engine seems to be a part of the NAND controller, so it's > unlikely that the DT maintainers will agree for it to have a separate > node > Will drop this patch as this was NAK-ed QPIC controller has the ecc pipelined so will keep the ecc support inlined in both raw nand and serial nand driver. Regards Alam.
On 10/31/2023 10:42 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 31/10/2023 13:03, Md Sadre Alam wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com> >> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <quic_srichara@quicinc.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi >> index 5f83ee42a719..b44acb1fac74 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi >> @@ -336,6 +336,11 @@ sdhc_1: mmc@7804000 { >> status = "disabled"; >> }; >> >> + bch: qpic_ecc { >> + compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-ecc"; > > NAK. There are so many wrong things with it... Let's start with missing > checkpatch. Then with unndeeded label. Then with not allowed underscores > in node names. > Finally: >> + status = "ok"; > > Drop. > Ok > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi index 5f83ee42a719..b44acb1fac74 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi @@ -336,6 +336,11 @@ sdhc_1: mmc@7804000 { status = "disabled"; }; + bch: qpic_ecc { + compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-ecc"; + status = "ok"; + } + blsp_dma: dma-controller@7884000 { compatible = "qcom,bam-v1.7.0"; reg = <0x07884000 0x2b000>;